• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Please!! No More Crotch Clutching Routines
<<
<
11 of 13
>>
>
fancynancy
02-11-2011
[quote=Jan2555*GG*;54192252]
Originally Posted by fancynancy:
“
Well we cant possibly know can we.....but I am entitled to my opinon and my feelings (which actually were not that offended) until he called me a prude and small minded...the man needs to learn some tact and manners.......I am not into bad boys....he came into Strictly with a reputation....I know absolutely nothing about football so I gave him the benefit of the doubt and felt that he had been unfairly branded as a sulky prima donna from the evidence of his first 2 or 3 weeks...On Saturday his reaction to Craigs score of 4 and comments made by the public (which is their right) showed me that my first impression was wrong......he is a spoiled sulky little boy.”

Of course you're entitled to your feelings - he's got up your nose. Fair enough.

But there does seem to be a suggestion - not necessarily your post - that SCD viewers nationwide are clutching their pearls in a fit of moral outrage.

All I can say is
Jan2555*GG*
02-11-2011
[quote=fancynancy;54192490]
Originally Posted by Jan2555*GG*:
“
Of course you're entitled to your feelings - he's got up your nose. Fair enough.

But there does seem to be a suggestion - not necessarily your post - that SCD viewers nationwide are clutching their pearls in a fit of moral outrage.

All I can say is ”

I think thats fair...yes he has got up my nose....I feel cross not outraged.
fancynancy
02-11-2011
[quote=Jan2555*GG*;54192926]
Originally Posted by fancynancy:
“
I think thats fair...yes he has got up my nose....I feel cross not outraged.”

Thought as much - you're too reasonable to think otherwise, really.
Ignazio
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by fancynancy:
“
Of course you're entitled to your feelings - he's got up your nose. Fair enough.

But there does seem to be a suggestion - not necessarily your post - that SCD viewers nationwide are clutching their pearls in a fit of moral outrage.

All I can say is ”

Not all those who consider Robbie's actions to be inappropriate wear pearls - nor are they all 'Angry from Tunbridge Wells DM readers.'

This Guardian reader owns no pearls to clutch - nor do I feel outrage (a little nauseous perhaps) - but I did find the crotch clutching overly suggestive.

I'd like to suggest to him that next time he feels the urge to check that his manhood is still in place and intact, he does it in private.
TerryM22
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Austenfan:
“I that's the case then shouldn't they get rid of all the revealing outfits and all the sexy dances as well!!”

Long flowing Ginger Rogers dresses would be an improvement for the show.
-Sid-
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“Not all those who consider Robbie's actions to be inappropriate wear pearls - nor are they all 'Angry from Tunbridge Wells DM readers.'

This Guardian reader owns no pearls to clutch - nor do I feel outrage (a little nauseous perhaps) - but I did find the crotch clutching overly suggestive.

I'd like to suggest to him that next time he feels the urge to check that his manhood is still in place and intact, he does it in private.”

You didn't mind when I did it

On a serious note, I'm with you on this one Ignazio. It was a bit vulgar (as Nancy would put it!) and I don't want to see it again.

x
Ignazio
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by TerryM22:
“I'm glad you agree with, and are in harmony Ann Widdecombe who raised the issue of youngsters watching Strictly in her column in the Daily Express today.”

My opinion of the Daily Express is similar to my view of the Daily Mail and similar to what I think of Widdy.

In fact last year I found the sight of her crotch in those yellow bloomers just as yuk inducing as I did Robbie's crotch clutching antics.
Austenfan
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by TerryM22:
“Long flowing Ginger Rogers dresses would be an improvement for the show.”

Love it, big big fan of Fred and Ginger!!
Ignazio
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“You didn't mind when I did it

On a serious note, I'm with you on this one Ignazio. It was a bit vulgar (as Nancy would put it!) and I don't want to see it again.

x”

You're incorrigible.

Had a crap day - thanks for making me smile.

xxx
TerryM22
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“My opinion of the Daily Express is similar to my view of the Daily Mail and similar to what I think of Widdy.

In fact last year I found the sight of her crotch in those yellow bloomers just as yuk inducing as I did Robbie's crotch clutching antics.”

As you will remember, Ann's yellow tights top's was an accidental exposure.
fancynancy
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“Not all those who consider Robbie's actions to be inappropriate wear pearls - nor are they all 'Angry from Tunbridge Wells DM readers.'

This Guardian reader owns no pearls to clutch - nor do I feel outrage (a little nauseous perhaps) - but I did find the crotch clutching overly suggestive.

I'd like to suggest to him that next time he feels the urge to check that his manhood is still in place and intact, he does it in private.”

My post alluded to the notion - expressed in another post - that SCD viewers nationwide were experiencing mass disapprobation which would result in Mr Savage feeling the full weight of their wrath expressed in next weeks' voting figures. All of which is quite a long way from suggesting that any viewer discomfited to either a greater or lesser degree by Robbie's gyrations (and, lest we forget, by Ola's choreography) are pearl wearers.

Quite apart from anything else, I'm sure you're aware that pearls are deeply unfashionable at present and hence you would not be seen dead wearing them. Ever.
peeve
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by fancynancy:
“My post alluded to the notion - expressed in another post - that SCD viewers nationwide were experiencing mass disapprobation which would result in Mr Savage feeling the full weight of their wrath expressed in next weeks' voting figures. All of which is quite a long way from suggesting that any viewer discomfited to either a greater or lesser degree by Robbie's gyrations (and, lest we forget, by Ola's choreography) are pearl wearers.

Quite apart from anything else, I'm sure you're aware that pearls are deeply unfashionable at present and hence you would not be seen dead wearing them. Ever. ”

Damn! Just bought a really pretty pink pearl bracelet and have been looking for a matching necklace. Does this mean I'll have to start reading the Daily Mail?
Ignazio
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by peeve:
“Damn! Just bought a really pretty pink pearl bracelet and have been looking for a matching necklace. Does this mean I'll have to start reading the Daily Mail? ”

Get thee to the limerick lthread.
fancynancy
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by peeve:
“Damn! Just bought a really pretty pink pearl bracelet and have been looking for a matching necklace. Does this mean I'll have to start reading the Daily Mail? ”

You'll need a matching twinset.
Ignazio
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“You're incorrigible.

Had a crap day - thanks for making me smile.

xxx”

Too late to edit - but would your hand cover it?

xxx
Waites Girl
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Austenfan:
“I thought we lived in a democratic country where people can say how they feel and defend themselves, guess I was wrong. There are small minded people on here, who have made such a fuss about a harmless dance routine where he tried to imitate Michael Jackson.

Nobody seems concerned that Harry pretended to kill Aliona by breaking her neck!!!! Oh no that's fine, imitaing violence is ok obviously, but a few thrusts and everyone is up in arms.

Absolutley ridiculous!!!!

I haven't voted for Robbie but will be now from Saturday. I won't be condeming him, just because of

a. one dance
b. because he voices his opinion on the matter.

And to the poeple who criticise his replies to all the bad comments he has had this week, the man never portrayed himself to be a saint for god's sake.

Think there are a few people on here that need to get a grip, there are a lot's of worse things in the world than a few bad imitations to a Michael Jackson song.”

Oh dear, now YOU'RE calling those of us who were offended, small minded, Austenfan. Why is it that some people apparently have to call anyone who doesn't agree with them small minded ??
Doghouse Riley
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Waites Girl:
“Oh dear, now YOU'RE calling those of us who were offended, small minded, Austenfan. Why is it that some people apparently have to call anyone who doesn't agree with them small minded ??”

Sorry Waites Girl, but you obviously don't understand how this message board works, although after a mere thirty-odd posts, you should be getting the hang of it.

If you post something, that another considers a criticism of a person or programme on TV, they may take that very personally indeed, if they have a contrary opinion to you.

This can lead to personal remarks being made to you for having an opposing view to them.

If you then respond, not necessarily vociferously, you can be then accused of a "rant," or receive a reply (this is my favourite as it always makes me smile) with an indignant response that begins with an "I merely" or an "I just"
Or as in the example of Robbie Savage's considered by many "inappropriate gesture," with being offered what I call a "feast or famine" choice, something like "I s'pose you'll only be happy if all the women stop wearing attractive dresses and wear sacks."


It has ever been thus.
Ignazio
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Austenfan:
“I thought we lived in a democratic country where people can say how they feel and defend themselves, guess I was wrong. There are small minded people on here, who have made such a fuss about a harmless dance routine where he tried to imitate Michael Jackson.

Nobody seems concerned that Harry pretended to kill Aliona by breaking her neck!!!! Oh no that's fine, imitaing violence is ok obviously, but a few thrusts and everyone is up in arms.

Absolutley ridiculous!!!!

I haven't voted for Robbie but will be now from Saturday. I won't be condeming him, just because of

a. one dance
b. because he voices his opinion on the matter.

And to the poeple who criticise his replies to all the bad comments he has had this week, the man never portrayed himself to be a saint for god's sake.

Think there are a few people on here that need to get a grip, there are a lot's of worse things in the world than a few bad imitations to a Michael Jackson song.”

[LIST][*]I too thought I live in a democratic country where I can express my views without being considered small minded; guess I was wrong.[*]Robbie can voice his opinion on the matter - I reserve the right to disagree.[*]Has anyone suggested Robbie portrays himself as a saint? [/LIST]
oulandy
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“Sorry Waites Girl, but you obviously don't understand how this message board works, although after a mere thirty-odd posts, you should be getting the hang of it.

If you post something, that another considers a criticism of a person or programme on TV, they may take that very personally indeed, if they have a contrary opinion to you.

This can lead to personal remarks being made to you for having an opposing view to them.

If you then respond, not necessarily vociferously, you can be then accused of a "rant," or receive a reply (this is my favourite as it always makes me smile) with an indignant response that begins with an "I merely" or an "I just"
Or as in the example of Robbie Savage's considered by many "inappropriate gesture," with being offered what I call a "feast or famine" choice, something like "I s'pose you'll only be happy if all the women stop wearing attractive dresses and wear sacks."


It has ever been thus.”

Very funny. And how true.
Doghouse Riley
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by oulandy:
“Very funny. And how true.”

Thank you for recognising attempted humour that I didn't feel the necessity of adding smilies. (I refuse to use them).
Austenfan
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Waites Girl:
“Oh dear, now YOU'RE calling those of us who were offended, small minded, Austenfan. Why is it that some people apparently have to call anyone who doesn't agree with them small minded ??”

Sorry Waitesgirl I can see your point but I still don't get it!!!
I cannot understand why the fuss to be honest!!

There were other things on that Halloween show I would have thought were more inappropriate than Robbie's dance.
oulandy
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“Thank you for recognising attempted humour that I didn't feel the necessity of adding smilies. (I refuse to use them).”

I'm going to take umbrage and fly into a rage. Grrr...
Doghouse Riley
02-11-2011
Originally Posted by oulandy:
“I'm going to take umbrage and fly into a rage. Grrr...”

Be my guest, you wouldn't be the first.

There's a few on this message board that take TV, people on it and other people's opinions far too seriously, but they do make me smile.
emjon01
03-11-2011
Originally Posted by Austenfan:
“Sorry Waitesgirl I can see your point but I still don't get it!!!
I cannot understand why the fuss to be honest!!”

Because Robbie was previously termed the bad boy of football - was there this amount of uproar when that nice young man from Countryfile simulated sex with his partner on the floor in their salsa last year??

Quote:
“There were other things on that Halloween show I would have thought were more inappropriate than Robbie's dance.”

I agree re the depictions of killings - besides the whole show was inapropriate to the festivals of Samhain and All Hallows Eve
Sandra Bee
03-11-2011
Robbie and Ola are on 'Daybreak' this morning. It will be interesting to see if the crotch grabbing is mentioned.

I can't think of any other reason they are on the show.
<<
<
11 of 13
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map