• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
What kind of name is Little MIx?
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
slowdown
31-10-2011
It all got big LOLZ in my house on Saturday night. What a rubbish, rubbish name for a band. Rhythmix sucked, and this is even worse.

..I also don't get how people actually like this horribly manufactured group? They can't sing, they aren't very attractive, they have nothing interesting to say - what's the appeal?
tawe
31-10-2011
Little Minx Sounds better
Monster101
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by slowdown:
“It all got big LOLZ in my house on Saturday night. What a rubbish, rubbish name for a band. Rhythmix sucked, and this is even worse.

..I also don't get how people actually like this horribly manufactured group? They can't sing, they aren't very attractive, they have nothing interesting to say - what's the appeal?”

poppycock poppycock poppycock!!!!
they are great. little mix for the finale !!
slowdown
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Monster101:
“poppycock poppycock poppycock!!!!
they are great. little mix for the finale !!”

Stuffing Mix would have been better.
actually
31-10-2011
"10p mix up" makes more sence
Mick_Swagger
31-10-2011
They can't sing? I think they're decent singers, and since when have Boy and Girl bands ever been about great vocals?

they aren't very attractive - I think thats part of the appeal, they look like 'normal' girls and dont come across as slutty or bitchy and i certainly wouldnt say they were unattractive.

they have nothing interesting to say - Has any X Factor contestant ever?
Kapellmeister
31-10-2011
It's an appalling name, that's what kind of name it is.
jjbir
31-10-2011
What kind of a name is detinys child, girls aloud etc? It don't matter if they produce songs people want to hear the name is irrelevant.
slowdown
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by jjbir:
“What kind of a name is detinys child, girls aloud etc? It don't matter if they produce songs people want to hear the name is irrelevant.”

I think a band name is a really important part of the 'branding'.

I also don't think they a producing songs people want to hear. I think they are murdering songs and stealing a valuable two minutes from everyone's lives each week, and not even making those two minutes sound or look pretty.

..and 'the tears' on Saturday night - if she's so self-conscious then she'd go and do something about her size and look. She's like an oversized, talentless ragdoll.
Ilikesprouts
31-10-2011
Edible

I am thinking Dolly Mixtures
staceyxxx23
31-10-2011
They should've gone for Pic N' Mix
slowdown
31-10-2011
Shi* mix?
mandylou1
31-10-2011
Suppose it's a little bit better than Pick 'n Mix (which what they have been doing with all of the groups this year )
Kapellmeister
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by slowdown:
“ I think they are murdering songs and stealing a valuable two minutes from everyone's lives each week, and not even making those two minutes sound or look pretty.”

ModernPrimate
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by jjbir:
“What kind of a name is detinys child, girls aloud etc? It don't matter if they produce songs people want to hear the name is irrelevant.”

I know what you're saying, but Little Mix really is stupid, a stupid stupid stuuuuupid name. Nu-vibe for example was a pretty good name. The Risk... well it's a poor name also, but not as much as Little Mix.

How about...: Wonder Mix, Girl Mix, Melody Mix, Mystic Mix.

Anything would have been better. Little Mix sounds like they're a little band doing little things.
M_apple5
31-10-2011
someone's a bit jealous...
mancghirl
31-10-2011
Lidl Mix.
slowdown
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by M_apple5:
“someone's a bit jealous...”

?!

I so hope this post is being ironic!
ModernPrimate
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by slowdown:
“?!

I so hope this post is being ironic!”

You are anthropomorphizing a post.
M_apple5
31-10-2011
yup. because janet completely underwhelmed and underperformed when little mix shone!
mrcynical
31-10-2011
The name is irrelevant. It's not like they have a future in music.
my name is joe
31-10-2011
its a crap name but they said that about the Beatles

this forum likes comparisons so there's a good un for you
Kromm
31-10-2011
Rythmix was a pretty bad name too.

Honestly, if they HAD to have "Mix" in the name, to be consistent with the first name, and also to indicate, I guess, that they were a "mix" of solo contestants, then I would have simply called them...

"The Mix".
BinCat
01-11-2011
Myxomatosis would be more appropriate
NightFalls
01-11-2011
Originally Posted by slowdown:
“It all got big LOLZ in my house on Saturday night. What a rubbish, rubbish name for a band. Rhythmix sucked, and this is even worse.

..I also don't get how people actually like this horribly manufactured group? They can't sing, they aren't very attractive, they have nothing interesting to say - what's the appeal?”

It's a far better name then the rediculous 'Pussycat dolls'. Who on earth thought that one up should have had a rethink!

What is so funny about the group name 'Little Mix' anyway, i have a sense of humour but didn't find it humourous!?
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map