DS Forums

 
 

Is Michael Jackson the best entertainer ever.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18-02-2012, 09:42
mushymanrob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,755
Pandy65 made the most sensible post in this thread. Music and everything to do with it is definitley very highly subjective. We all have different tastes - no ones is better than the other.

]
only to a point.... the only thing thats subjective is whether or not someone likes it, whether a particular artist/track speaks to you. but facts arent subjective, the truth of the evolution of pop music isnt subjective, and the people who influenced and steered it isnt subjective.

To Be Best Entertainer Ever:

1 To be attractive
2 Fantastic Dancer
3 Outstanding Voice
4 Charismatic
5 Groundbreaking
6 Funny
7 No 1 Showbusiness person in the 80's the most competitive decade in showbiz history.

Michael Jackson ticks all those boxes.
lol... only to a fan!

and thats the point, i poste when this thread was ressurected that fans think he is, everyone else knows hes not.


I was a kid during the 80's and i lived thru it EVERYBODY waited for the next MJ single and video, brillant as Madonna and Prince were this was not quite the same case, but looking back i think Madonna was trieding to get the Jackson effect.
UTTER RUBBISH.... sorry but with respect that did not happen. the only people who were waiting for jacksons next release were his fans.

you demonstrate on this thread everything wrong with jackson fans, your view is one of a fan and you try to impose that on the world of music generally. music fans watched out for any big artist, and after 'off the wall' jackson was one of those. but the big hyped up publicity stunt that was the vid for thriller turned many off as the quality of his material declined. ironically his fan base grew, so he gathered a large and devoted fanbase who worship him, but music fans started to desert him.
mushymanrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 18-02-2012, 09:46
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,035
I was a kid during the 80's and i lived thru it EVERYBODY waited for the next MJ single and video, brillant as Madonna and Prince were this was not quite the same case, but looking back i think Madonna was trieding to get the Jackson effect.
no, as i mentioned before prince was in another league compared to MJ as he was considerably more talented and worked considerably harder, investing his money into his world class studio to make more music and rehearse and put on live shows, instead of blowing it on a zoo and fairground

madonna does follow a similar path as she similarly requires other people to create her music, and her image and videos rather than musical talent plays a larger part in her fame, and she similarly mimes on stage. she has however been far more successful than MJ with her music career, with far more hit albums and singles, and still hitting the charts year on year and selling out shows
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 09:58
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,035
MJ danced too hard to do an entire show live. I'd like to see King Elvis do the same routines and sing live for an entire concert. Of course he couldn't, but of course you are now somehow going to tell me that Elvis was a better dancer.

MJ sold the most records in the 80's, more than all those artists you mentioned.

Yes he messed his face up later on but at one point he wasn't bad looking. Elvis was also a good looking guy in his youth but when he got older he became fat and washed up.


Neither Elvis or MJ did anything original if you want to be rigid in your definition. Elvis took the music of many black artists and put some of his own spin on it. He therefore brought to the mainstream world something that they had not seen before but it existed previously.

MJ took a lot of the dances he saw being done on the streets and some inspiration from James Brown, put some of his own spin on it and introduced it to the mainstream world. Again for the most part it was something the majority of the world had not seem before but it existed previously.


Finally, I think people place too much emphasis on pop and rock n roll genres. There are other genres and IMO all genres should be as important as others. The Beatles and Elvis did not have the same defining impact on those genres.
i presume you aren't too familiar with MJ's live work. he did not dance energetically very often during his live shows. he certainly was not so energetic on stage that he should not have been able to sing live. prince was 10 times more energetic on stage, with far more energetic dancing, and far longer shows, and he never shouted or sounded out of breathe as he trained and rehearsed properly to be able to do so

simply put, if a singer can't sing live during their shows, they shouldn't be on stage

as for the dancing, it wasn't MJ who put his spin on things, it was the choreographers. you know when you watch music videos, the artists don't usually make up the dance routines? they don't usually direct the videos? they often don't write the songs or play any instruments on them. when you see an MJ video, you see and hear the work of dozens of people. likewise during a concert or movie

regarding other genres, you probably aren't aware that prince has released a number of jazz albums, and music in a variety of styles, or that the influence of artists like elvis and the bealtes, and even prince flows throughout a number of genres from jazz to classical, blues, hip hop, dance, and i mean those styles in the purest sense, not pop-dance. miles davis performed a lot of princes work during his later live shows, in fact the final piece of music that miles davis played live in concert was a prince composition. and miles davis was the greatest jazz musician of all time. frank sinatra and even the elvis covered the beatles, who are perhaps the most covered band in history

on the other hand, MJ's influence on music was not considerable at all , certainly not amongst other genres. as covered before, the artists who claim MJ's influence are amongst a list of some of the worst acts to hit the charts in recent years, the current batch of autotune mimimg pop puppets who rely on publicity and videos and promotion to counteract a major lack of talent
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 10:06
oblivian
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orpington
Posts: 3,857
i presume you aren't too familiar with MJ's live work. he did not dance energetically very often during his live shows. he certainly was not so energetic on stage that he should not have been able to sing live. prince was 10 times more energetic on stage, with far more energetic dancing, and far longer shows, and he never shouted or sounded out of breathe as he trained and rehearsed properly to be able to do so

simply put, if a singer can't sing live during their shows, they shouldn't be on stage

as for the dancing, it wasn't MJ who put his spin on things, it was the choreographers. you know when you watch music videos, the artists don't usually make up the dance routines? they don't usually direct the videos? they often don't write the songs or play any instruments on them. when you see an MJ video, you see and hear the work of dozens of people. likewise during a concert or movie

regarding other genres, you probably aren't aware that prince has released a number of jazz albums, and music in a variety of styles, or that the influence of artists like elvis and the bealtes, and even prince flows throughout a number of genres from jazz to classical, blues, hip hop, dance, and i mean those styles in the purest sense, not pop-dance. miles davis performed a lot of princes work during his later live shows, in fact the final piece of music that miles davis played live in concert was a prince composition. and miles davis was the greatest jazz musician of all time. frank sinatra and even the elvis covered the beatles, who are perhaps the most covered band in history

on the other hand, MJ's influence on music was not considerable at all , certainly not amongst other genres. as covered before, the artists who claim MJ's influence are amongst a list of some of the worst acts to hit the charts in recent years, the current batch of autotune mimimg pop puppets who rely on publicity and videos and promotion to counteract a major lack of talent
Thats quite enough of that, a balanced, reasonable and generally well thought out reply like that has no business being on this thread!!
oblivian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 10:09
Pandy65
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 762
I have to agree that you cant change the history of pop. Bill Haley started it and i actually like him more than Elvis, although I do like a lot of Elvis stuff. Elvis was the man who ran with the idea and created popular music. He was extremely charismatic and used his films to get that across. The Beatles did the same, taking a new sound and steering pop in a new direction. Whilst MJ made films, he was not able to steer pop in a new direction, as pop had already discovered that different genres could exist side by side. In that respect no one can lay claim to what Haley, Presley and the Beatles achieved.
Pandy65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 10:16
Anika Hanson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14,219
i presume you aren't too familiar with MJ's live work. he did not dance energetically very often during his live shows. he certainly was not so energetic on stage that he should not have been able to sing live. prince was 10 times more energetic on stage, with far more energetic dancing, and far longer shows, and he never shouted or sounded out of breathe as he trained and rehearsed properly to be able to do so

simply put, if a singer can't sing live during their shows, they shouldn't be on stage

as for the dancing, it wasn't MJ who put his spin on things, it was the choreographers. you know when you watch music videos, the artists don't usually make up the dance routines? they don't usually direct the videos? they often don't write the songs or play any instruments on them. when you see an MJ video, you see and hear the work of dozens of people. likewise during a concert or movie

regarding other genres, you probably aren't aware that prince has released a number of jazz albums, and music in a variety of styles, or that the influence of artists like elvis and the bealtes, and even prince flows throughout a number of genres from jazz to classical, blues, hip hop, dance, and i mean those styles in the purest sense, not pop-dance. miles davis performed a lot of princes work during his later live shows, in fact the final piece of music that miles davis played live in concert was a prince composition. and miles davis was the greatest jazz musician of all time. frank sinatra and even the elvis covered the beatles, who are perhaps the most covered band in history

on the other hand, MJ's influence on music was not considerable at all , certainly not amongst other genres. as covered before, the artists who claim MJ's influence are amongst a list of some of the worst acts to hit the charts in recent years, the current batch of autotune mimimg pop puppets who rely on publicity and videos and promotion to counteract a major lack of talent
I've seen a lot of MJ's concert DVD's and he did a fair amount of dancing in those. He also attempted to sing live in the majority of the songs, although he didn't sound too great on those with a lot of dance routines.

MJ was credited with producing and choreographing some of his music videos. For example he is credited with writing the screen play and producing and chereographing the thriller video, which is probably one of his most iconic videos. He is also well known for co-writting most of his material. So to say he is talentless and had little input in his career is quite unfair.

Also when I spoke of other genres I was not implying that MJ had influenced them all, I was rather referring to be all and end all attitude that some people take when discussing the impact of the Beatles and Elvis.
Anika Hanson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 10:39
Pandy65
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 762
Elvis and the Beatles werent the be all and end all. But they did do what no one has done since. There are loads of excellent entertainers out there. Abba were great, so were the Rolling Stones, Alice Cooper, the Eurythmics, Tina Turner, Madonna, Prince, Sting, the list of greats is long and MJ earnt his place amongst them, i appreciate that, but was he the best? Not to me, no.
Pandy65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 13:57
mushymanrob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,755
Elvis and the Beatles werent the be all and end all. But they did do what no one has done since. There are loads of excellent entertainers out there. Abba were great, so were the Rolling Stones, Alice Cooper, the Eurythmics, Tina Turner, Madonna, Prince, Sting, the list of greats is long and MJ earnt his place amongst them, i appreciate that, but was he the best? Not to me, no.
exactly, jackson fans appear to swallow the hype that he was responsible for nearly everything in pop, but in reality he was just another big star at one time.
mushymanrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 20:56
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,035
I've seen a lot of MJ's concert DVD's and he did a fair amount of dancing in those. He also attempted to sing live in the majority of the songs, although he didn't sound too great on those with a lot of dance routines.

MJ was credited with producing and choreographing some of his music videos. For example he is credited with writing the screen play and producing and chereographing the thriller video, which is probably one of his most iconic videos. He is also well known for co-writting most of his material. So to say he is talentless and had little input in his career is quite unfair.

Also when I spoke of other genres I was not implying that MJ had influenced them all, I was rather referring to be all and end all attitude that some people take when discussing the impact of the Beatles and Elvis.
the thriller dance routine is the exact same dance routine used in the shake your tailfeather sequence in the blues brothers movie that was directed by the same guy who directed the thriller video who was the same guy who directed the american werewolf in london movie that was also copied in the thriller video

so that iconic video you refer to is a perfect example of MJ not being groundbreaking in the slightest and just copying stuff

or take the beat it or bad videos that copy west side story. the entire dance routines involving multiple dancers doing the same moves is taken from movies going back 60 years before thriller
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 21:45
Annieca
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,161
the thriller dance routine is the exact same dance routine used in the shake your tailfeather sequence in the blues brothers movie that was directed by the same guy who directed the thriller video who was the same guy who directed the american werewolf in london movie that was also copied in the thriller video

so that iconic video you refer to is a perfect example of MJ not being groundbreaking in the slightest and just copying stuff

or take the beat it or bad videos that copy west side story. the entire dance routines involving multiple dancers doing the same moves is taken from movies going back 60 years before thriller
Well can you proof it!
Annieca is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2012, 22:13
Pandy65
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 762
Well can you proof it!
be careful wht u wish for....
Pandy65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 01:22
ericos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Royston Vasey
Posts: 1,748
Micheal was a very good dancer but after his Off the wall album his music was not a patch on his early stuff. And if it wasn't for the brilliant video for Thriller the single wouldn't be so well thought of.
This echoes my thoughts entirely
ericos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 08:11
mushymanrob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,755
Micheal was a very good dancer but after his Off the wall album his music was not a patch on his early stuff. And if it wasn't for the brilliant video for Thriller the single wouldn't be so well thought of.
i dispute the thriller video was 'brilliant', the most brilliant thing about it was the way it was promoted. as 'unique' has pointed out above, the vid itself was a complete plagiarisation of john landis's earlier work.

so hats off the the promoters, who somehow have elevated this publicity stunt into the annals of music, claiming its position as 'the most popular', when in reality there are hundereds of lesser known vids that DID cut new ground.
mushymanrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 08:13
mushymanrob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,755
Well can you proof it!
easy...go look up the things hes cited.
mushymanrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 10:54
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,035
Well can you proof it!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080455/

blues brothers movie 1980

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdbrIrFxas0

shake your tailfeather routine from that movie, which you can buy on dvd, bluray or vhs, even betamax from amazon or play or hmv etc

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082010/

an american werewolf in london from 1981. also directed by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFLQS12z8K4

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088263/

thriller, 1983 by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG6oy46qKE4


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055614/

west side story 1961

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8R9GiLImSw

that's just a small part of the video. look familiar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRdxUFDoQe0

beat it video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsUXAEzaC3Q



now, this is a clip from 1936

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qRxdIFszAk

this is from 1932

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC5Mx...eature=related

so that clip is 51 years older than the thriller video. that's the same number of years MJ was alive

now these things may be new to you, but this is just common knowledge to many people. people who grew up seeing these things on tv or in cinemas, or hearing the music on radio knew there was nothing new or exciting about his music or videos as it had all been done before

as i've mentioned before a few times, the reason MJ fans think this stuff is so exciting, and why they bang on and on about it is simply because they don't know enough about music, they haven't experienced enough, and once they come across MJ they are reluctant to delve deeper and find out what motivated and influenced his music

on the other hand, fans of other artists are usually the opposite and will delve deep to discover the influences of the artists they like in order to get a better understanding of their work, and to discover and enjoy more music and movies and books etc. that's what real fans of music normally do, instead of simply blindly worshipping the artist and looking no further, and that's why MJ fans get a verbal hammering on forums when they start spouting nonsense as it just makes them look like uneducated unknowledgeable idiots. it's one thing to enjoy the work, but it's another to make the assumption it's the greatest without checking out the competition fully, as that's when you discover he was far from original or great
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 11:07
Yorkie47
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,443
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080455/

blues brothers movie 1980

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdbrIrFxas0

shake your tailfeather routine from that movie, which you can buy on dvd, bluray or vhs, even betamax from amazon or play or hmv etc

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082010/

an american werewolf in london from 1981. also directed by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFLQS12z8K4

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088263/

thriller, 1983 by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG6oy46qKE4


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055614/

west side story 1961

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8R9GiLImSw

that's just a small part of the video. look familiar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRdxUFDoQe0

beat it video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsUXAEzaC3Q



now, this is a clip from 1936

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qRxdIFszAk

this is from 1932

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC5Mx...eature=related

so that clip is 51 years older than the thriller video. that's the same number of years MJ was alive

now these things may be new to you, but this is just common knowledge to many people. people who grew up seeing these things on tv or in cinemas, or hearing the music on radio knew there was nothing new or exciting about his music or videos as it had all been done before

as i've mentioned before a few times, the reason MJ fans think this stuff is so exciting, and why they bang on and on about it is simply because they don't know enough about music, they haven't experienced enough, and once they come across MJ they are reluctant to delve deeper and find out what motivated and influenced his music

on the other hand, fans of other artists are usually the opposite and will delve deep to discover the influences of the artists they like in order to get a better understanding of their work, and to discover and enjoy more music and movies and books etc. that's what real fans of music normally do, instead of simply blindly worshipping the artist and looking no further, and that's why MJ fans get a verbal hammering on forums when they start spouting nonsense as it just makes them look like uneducated unknowledgeable idiots. it's one thing to enjoy the work, but it's another to make the assumption it's the greatest without checking out the competition fully, as that's when you discover he was far from original or great
How brilliantly researched and thank you for pointing out such musical treats.

No doubt MJ was a great dancer but the greatest dancer ever? One look at the work of the brilliant Fred Astaire will tell you otherwise.

You make total sense with your post. However, most MJ fans won't look at these clips. It proves though that nothing is really totally new. Music and dance evolves through time and everyone is influenced in some way by what has gone before.

Great post.
Yorkie47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 11:08
Anika Hanson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14,219
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080455/

blues brothers movie 1980

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdbrIrFxas0

shake your tailfeather routine from that movie, which you can buy on dvd, bluray or vhs, even betamax from amazon or play or hmv etc

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082010/

an american werewolf in london from 1981. also directed by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFLQS12z8K4

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088263/

thriller, 1983 by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG6oy46qKE4


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055614/

west side story 1961

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8R9GiLImSw

that's just a small part of the video. look familiar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRdxUFDoQe0

beat it video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsUXAEzaC3Q



now, this is a clip from 1936

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qRxdIFszAk

this is from 1932

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC5Mx...eature=related

so that clip is 51 years older than the thriller video. that's the same number of years MJ was alive

now these things may be new to you, but this is just common knowledge to many people. people who grew up seeing these things on tv or in cinemas, or hearing the music on radio knew there was nothing new or exciting about his music or videos as it had all been done before

as i've mentioned before a few times, the reason MJ fans think this stuff is so exciting, and why they bang on and on about it is simply because they don't know enough about music, they haven't experienced enough, and once they come across MJ they are reluctant to delve deeper and find out what motivated and influenced his music

on the other hand, fans of other artists are usually the opposite and will delve deep to discover the influences of the artists they like in order to get a better understanding of their work, and to discover and enjoy more music and movies and books etc. that's what real fans of music normally do, instead of simply blindly worshipping the artist and looking no further, and that's why MJ fans get a verbal hammering on forums when they start spouting nonsense as it just makes them look like uneducated unknowledgeable idiots. it's one thing to enjoy the work, but it's another to make the assumption it's the greatest without checking out the competition fully, as that's when you discover he was far from original or great
Not really. There is no crime in not knowing something, we can't know everything. The point is, what do you do when you are presented with new information? You should read it and then see if it changes the opinions and beliefs you already hold. If it doesn't you are aware of the new data and can then defend your opinion by saying why you believe that the new data is not relevant.

I haven't watched your links yet as I am quite busy this weekend. I'm not an obsessive MJ fan but thanks for posting them, I will watch them and see what I think afterwards.
Anika Hanson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 11:11
JoLuc
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,699
simple question simple answer. no.
JoLuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 11:27
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,035
Not really. There is no crime in not knowing something, we can't know everything. The point is, what do you do when you are presented with new information? You should read it and then see if it changes the opinions and beliefs you already hold. If it doesn't you are aware of the new data and can then defend your opinion by saying why you believe that the new data is not relevant.

I haven't watched your links yet as I am quite busy this weekend. I'm not an obsessive MJ fan but thanks for posting them, I will watch them and see what I think afterwards.
there is no crime in not knowing anything. that's not the point, which is that MJ fans will argue the toss about things they simply don't know about and don't understand and refuse to delve deeper and find out the truth. sometimes this goes to ridiculous lenghts such as one person trying to say he wasn't a drug addict, but not because he didn't know or believe he wasn't a drug addict, but because of semantics and a particular choice of wording they didn't like. so when you are trying to have a mature and adult conversation with someone like that, you just can't take them seriously

MJ was at the top of his game 30 years ago, so his fans have had several decades to experience other music in relation to his, but still today some won't have done that

btw the clips are just short 5 min sequences, you can just flick through them to see instantly the strong influences
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 14:41
Annieca
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,161
I don't think MJ ever presented himself as a songwriter or innovator(but other souces say he was interested in songwriting and had input in videos etc) his interest was primary in the entertainment aspect of showbusiness, in how members of public enjoyed the act and let them lose their own troubles for a while, that is why i say he may be best entertainer ever?
Annieca is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 16:17
Illeism
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Adele's Quick-Change/House.
Posts: 633
I don't think MJ ever presented himself as a songwriter or innovator(but other souces say he was interested in songwriting and had input in videos etc) his interest was primary in the entertainment aspect of showbusiness, in how members of public enjoyed the act and let them lose their own troubles for a while, that is why i say he may be best entertainer ever?
Honey, if that's all you were looking for, that's fine. Some MJ fans, however, made him out to be this unmatched talent, bigger and better than everyone else. In terms of entertainment in how you referenced it, that would be completely subjective and free of any fact, as it is how much enjoyment you take from something.

But I would point out that if you were to base being an entertainer on enjoyment of the act and not caring about troubles, I would argue that there are many people in different industries who did/do that better than he did; Marilyn, Frank, Madonna (mostly due to how they get/got people talking - and much more than MJ too).
Illeism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 23:24
Annieca
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,161
Honey, if that's all you were looking for, that's fine. Some MJ fans, however, made him out to be this unmatched talent, bigger and better than everyone else. In terms of entertainment in how you referenced it, that would be completely subjective and free of any fact, as it is how much enjoyment you take from something.

But I would point out that if you were to base being an entertainer on enjoyment of the act and not caring about troubles, I would argue that there are many people in different industries who did/do that better than he did; Marilyn, Frank, Madonna (mostly due to how they get/got people talking - and much more than MJ too).
But i don't think Michael regarded himself as having 'troubles' like these other artists, he simply liked entertaining if others had issues that was up to them.
Annieca is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2012, 23:36
Illeism
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Adele's Quick-Change/House.
Posts: 633
But i don't think Michael regarded himself as having 'troubles' like these other artists, he simply liked entertaining if others had issues that was up to them.
I was actually referencing your comment about the audience losing thoughts of their troubles in the entertainment, not that he had them (but by God he did).
Illeism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2012, 09:20
mushymanrob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,755
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080455/

blues brothers movie 1980

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdbrIrFxas0

shake your tailfeather routine from that movie, which you can buy on dvd, bluray or vhs, even betamax from amazon or play or hmv etc

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082010/

an american werewolf in london from 1981. also directed by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFLQS12z8K4

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088263/

thriller, 1983 by john landis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG6oy46qKE4


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055614/

west side story 1961

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8R9GiLImSw

that's just a small part of the video. look familiar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRdxUFDoQe0

beat it video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsUXAEzaC3Q



now, this is a clip from 1936

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qRxdIFszAk

this is from 1932

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC5Mx...eature=related

so that clip is 51 years older than the thriller video. that's the same number of years MJ was alive

now these things may be new to you, but this is just common knowledge to many people. people who grew up seeing these things on tv or in cinemas, or hearing the music on radio knew there was nothing new or exciting about his music or videos as it had all been done before

as i've mentioned before a few times, the reason MJ fans think this stuff is so exciting, and why they bang on and on about it is simply because they don't know enough about music, they haven't experienced enough, and once they come across MJ they are reluctant to delve deeper and find out what motivated and influenced his music

on the other hand, fans of other artists are usually the opposite and will delve deep to discover the influences of the artists they like in order to get a better understanding of their work, and to discover and enjoy more music and movies and books etc. that's what real fans of music normally do, instead of simply blindly worshipping the artist and looking no further, and that's why MJ fans get a verbal hammering on forums when they start spouting nonsense as it just makes them look like uneducated unknowledgeable idiots. it's one thing to enjoy the work, but it's another to make the assumption it's the greatest without checking out the competition fully, as that's when you discover he was far from original or great
well... i cant see how any reasonable person could argue against those facts. and highlights exactly why the thriller vid was hyped beyond belief to be something it wasnt.

it may have sold the most, but all that proves is that alot of people dont have a very deep understanding of the evolution of music and the music vid.
mushymanrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2012, 09:22
mushymanrob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,755
there is no crime in not knowing anything. that's not the point, which is that MJ fans will argue the toss about things they simply don't know about and don't understand and refuse to delve deeper and find out the truth.
exactly...
mushymanrob is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:58.