• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Stu and Michelle split up!
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
anna123
03-10-2004
i believe that cannonball was there
Informer
03-10-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“Having watched them being interviewed at that "award" ceremony, both of them responding like drugged up zombies, I would conclude that these two cardboard cut out idiots deserve each other totally.

She, we all know, is a greedy, soulless wannabe with no talent and no redeeming features - quite ugly and plastic looking, with an astounding inability to say anything of any interest now that she's got the 15 minutes of fame she's been craving all her twisted life.

He, though, is even worse than he was in the house, if that's possible. He was dressed like Noel Edmunds Junior and had all the charisma of a shop dummy, mumbling something about "love". I've said in the past that he's a good looking guy, but somehow deeply unattractive - he comes over as a total and complete prat.

There you go - two people who would have done anything for a bit of fame, yet once the camera gets stuck in their face they show that they have absolutely nothing to offer. Two of the emptiest , most worthless shells ever to parade themselves on televison.

This car crash TV couple should stick together - it will save two other innocent single people having their lives blighted by ever pairing up with either of them.

Just think, there's a man out there free of a psycho bunny boiler slapper, and there's some intelligent girl out there who doesn't have that limp blanket trailing around after her like a 9 year old.

These two people, whoever they are, are the real winners of BB5.”

So you think they shouldn't split up there hater?
CLL Dodge
03-10-2004
Gosh, some people hate being wrong, don't they.
bystander
03-10-2004
BB couples who formed a relationship in the house have a history of being successful.

Lee and Sophie and Paul and Helen come to mind. Even Tom and Claire were reasonably successful, even though they've split up now but they don't really count because they didn't start their relationship during their time in the house.
john-john
03-10-2004
Originally Posted by Informer:
“So you think they shouldn't split up there hater?”

That's right hater, I think they should definitely not split up.

I think that's what my post said.
john-john
03-10-2004
Originally Posted by BBDodge:
“Gosh, some people hate being wrong, don't they.”

I would imagine it would be an awful feeling, but then I really wouldn't know.
Informer
03-10-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“That's right hater, I think they should definitely not split up.

I think that's what my post said.”

No, your post was the usual mix of superlatives and ranting with hardly any relevance to the original question.

Do you do debate?
chrisdebag
04-10-2004
michelle and stuart are in love and will continue to be for a long time

well done chicken
monkey04
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by Cannonball:
“, noticed Nadia (looking absolutely stunning incidentally)”

As I haven't had a dig for a while

I find it very hard to imagine Nadia looking stunning, without the age long friend of alcohol (about 15 pints of beer should do)

As they say "Beer - helping ugly people have sex since 1694", I would still have a lot to learn without the help of beer.

Back on topic however - I really hope that Michelle and Stu don't split up. Not because I like either of them, no just so it will get them out of the papers quicker. Unfortunately I think a woman as ruthless as Michelle appears to be, will split up with him to get more money from selling her story.
john-john
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by Informer:
“No, your post was the usual mix of superlatives and ranting with hardly any relevance to the original question.

Do you do debate?”

"Debate" is rather a grand term when referring to the pros and cons of the continuing existence of some worthless wannabes, doncha think?

Informer, you really want to chill out a bit.
collymoresdog
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“michelle and stuart are in love and will continue to be for a long time

well done chicken”


Michelle and Stuart are feeding of each others fame nutrients and will continue to until OK Mag punts them out.
john-john
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“michelle and stuart are in love and will continue to be for a long time

well done chicken”


Aw Chris, bless. Michelle and Stuart really do make your life worth living, don't they?
batgirl
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by collymoresdog:
“Michelle and Stuart are feeding of each others fame nutrients and will continue to until OK Mag punts them out.”

May I say, that's a lovely way of putting it. I hope you don't mind, but I'm planning to use the phrase "fame nutrients" at the earliest available opportunity.
batgirl
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by collymoresdog:
“Michelle and Stuart are feeding of each others fame nutrients and will continue to until OK Mag punts them out.”

I quite like "until OK Mag punts them out" as well btw, but it might be harder to weave into the kind of conversations I usually have.
collymoresdog
04-10-2004
Is it wrong to suggest that Michelle and Stu are whoring themselves to fame?

No.
chrisdebag
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“Aw Chris, bless. Michelle and Stuart really do make your life worth living, don't they?”

michelle makes my time worth living she definately made my summer a great one

not long until the panto
batgirl
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by collymoresdog:
“Is it wrong to suggest that Michelle and Stu are whoring themselves to fame?

No.”

Of course it's not. I was simply appreciating the flair with which you executed your suggestion. (there really ought to be a 'I'm not being sarky' smilie)
Trashcan
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by collymoresdog:
“Is it wrong to suggest that Michelle and Stu are whoring themselves to fame?

No.”

You can suggest you have a purpose on this forum if you like.. doesn't make it true..
cougar 662
04-10-2004
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“michelle makes my time worth living she definately made my summer a great one

not long until the panto”


I have every confidence in Michelle's forthcoming panto season...she will play the rear end of the pantomine horse with style and panache I'm sure
john-john
05-10-2004
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“michelle makes my time worth living she definately made my summer a great one
”

Oh, God love you.
monkey04
05-10-2004
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“michelle makes my time worth living she definately made my summer a great one

not long until the panto”

Glad to hear it, you must be easily pleased
cougar 662
19-10-2004
It's official, it will happen soon, Michelle and Stuart are splitting up.
chrisdebag
20-10-2004
no they are very happy together good luck to them both
batgirl
20-10-2004
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“no they are very happy together good luck to them both”

chris, you're missing the point. When they split up, she'll be a free agent, down in the dumps a bit maybe, needing a little bit of attention and, dare I say it, unconditional, puppy-like devotion... See where I'm going with this? You don't want that Stuart hanging about. I bet he doesn't treat her right. Not like you would...
john-john
20-10-2004
Originally Posted by batgirl:
“chris, you're missing the point. When they split up, she'll be a free agent, down in the dumps a bit maybe, needing a little bit of attention and, dare I say it, unconditional, puppy-like devotion... See where I'm going with this? You don't want that Stuart hanging about. I bet he doesn't treat her right. Not like you would...”

I think chris and meme would make a lovely couple.
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map