• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Stu and Michelle split up!
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
FullMoon
20-10-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“I think chris and meme would make a lovely couple. ”

memedabag.

It's clearly meant to be
batgirl
20-10-2004
Originally Posted by FullMoon:
“memedabag.

It's clearly meant to be ”

I think Moomin-chops is a bit of a feminist deep down (no, don't laugh, I really think so), so she'd probably either keep her name or go for something like Moomin Bass-DeBag. It has a certain ring to it IMO.
misslizzie
20-10-2004
As I am still watching my BB5 tapes (sad, I know), I noticed that one of the purple drawings of housemates they had at each end of the ads was of a moomin saying 'Way-eye Chicken'.

Was this your artwork, J-J?? It was an astonishing likeness to MissHell.
collymoresdog
20-10-2004
Stu & Michelle are possibly the best celebrity couple since Little & Large.
mart533
20-10-2004
Originally Posted by collymoresdog:
“Stu & Michelle are possibly the best celebrity couple since Little & Large.”

and hinge and bracket.
cougar 662
22-12-2004
Just bringing this thread back as it will be used a lot in 2005...especially when the big announcement of the breakup is made in the national press.

tomorrow
22-12-2004
What a poor excuse for a thread imo.

Why? What's the point?
kaz1
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“Just bringing this thread back as it will be used a lot in 2005...especially when the big announcement of the breakup is made in the national press.

”


When in 2005? Or is this just your usual they will split up eventually thread that you post every couple of weeks. They've just had an article in Star mag declaring their love again and discussing their xmas plans but I suppose you think that's just fake aswell then. At the end of the day they are just like any other couple they could last for ages or split up soon. The only people that really know are them. Just let them enjoy their relationship while it lasts. Which will hopefully be a long time.
anna123
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by kaz1:
“When in 2005? Or is this just your usual they will split up eventually thread that you post every couple of weeks. They've just had an article in Star mag declaring their love again and discussing their xmas plans but I suppose you think that's just fake aswell then. At the end of the day they are just like any other couple they could last for ages or split up soon. The only people that really know are them. Just let them enjoy their relationship while it lasts. Which will hopefully be a long time.”

i agree kazzy
cougar 662
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by kaz1:
“When in 2005? Or is this just your usual they will split up eventually thread that you post every couple of weeks. They've just had an article in Star mag declaring their love again and discussing their xmas plans but I suppose you think that's just fake aswell then. At the end of the day they are just like any other couple they could last for ages or split up soon. The only people that really know are them. Just let them enjoy their relationship while it lasts. Which will hopefully be a long time.”


You seem to know an awful lot after just 13 posts, don't you know that your opinions won't be taken seriously until after at least 100?
kaz1
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“You seem to know an awful lot after just 13 posts, don't you know that your opinions won't be taken seriously until after at least 100? ”


We all have to start somewhere and just because I haven't posted a lot doesn't mean that I haven't been following your delightful posts.
anna123
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“You seem to know an awful lot after just 13 posts, don't you know that your opinions won't be taken seriously until after at least 100? ”

oh please! Since when? It doesnt matter wether you post 10 times or 1000!
cougar 662
23-12-2004
Kaz, its nothing personal against anybody, its just that i remember vividly Michelle's manipulative and at times pathological pursuit of her own interests in the house and can't understand why so many people have chosen to just brush all this under the carpet.

What unfortunately never happened in BB6 was Michelle not getting her own way (apart from the wedding task which should have told people all they needed to know about the 'real' michelle).

I still maintain the basis for real love is not the way in which she got her claws into Stuart. We have seen since in things like the X Factor how the media misrepresents and distorts the real situation. My belief is still that the relationship is money based and that any future income is largely dependent on them continuing to appear publicly as a 'couple'.
anna123
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“Kaz, its nothing personal against anybody, its just that i remember vividly Michelle's manipulative and at times pathological pursuit of her own interests in the house and can't understand why so many people have chosen to just brush all this under the carpet. ”


Thats your opinion but werent all the housemates out for themselves? IMO she was the most honest of them all! What makes you think she was manipulative?


[/quote]What unfortunately never happened in BB6 was Michelle not getting her own way (apart from the wedding task which should have told people all they needed to know about the 'real' michelle).
I still maintain the basis for real love is not the way in which she got her claws into Stuart. We have seen since in things like the X Factor how the media misrepresents and distorts the real situation. My belief is still that the relationship is money based and that any future income is largely dependent on them continuing to appear publicly as a 'couple'. [/quote]



but you've been saying that months and michelle and stu are still together! You'd be saying the same thing if there were married with kids! I dont think its fair to say its not real love coz you werent actually there and you dont know what was going through stus head in the bb house or what michelle and stu ar elike as a couple out of the house. And i dont think hes stupid enough to date a girl for a few months that he apparently doesnt have real feelings for! As for them only being together for the moeny well i dont agree however i wouldnt blame them for milkin all the fame out of bb that they can i mean all the houseamtes are doing that so why shouldnt they? If they get paid just to pose for a camera and do a couple of interviews then why not?
kaz1
23-12-2004
Well said Anna. Cougar you are entitled to your opinion and I respect that but it doesn't mean that I have to agree with it. I obviously saw a completely different side to Michelle than you did. I do believe they are genuine but whether they last or not well that's down to them.
john-john
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“Kaz, its nothing personal against anybody, its just that i remember vividly Michelle's manipulative and at times pathological pursuit of her own interests in the house and can't understand why so many people have chosen to just brush all this under the carpet.
”

Very true - at one point she had the whole nation talking about her obsessive, jealous, bunny-boiling behaviour.

The high points:

Throwing herself at Victor on Day 2
Throwing herself at Stu-pid on Day 3
Getting booted out after 2 weeks and having a face like a smacked arse about it (saved by the bedsit twist of course)
Being jealous all the time
Singing Pie Jesu
Being a bitch about bread making
Being a bitch generally
Throwing a flip flop when Ahmed saw right through her
Being a bunny boiler
Being more of a bunny boiler
Turning up at Stu-pids eviction night dressed like a 16 year old tart...



Oh, the list is endless...
kaz1
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“Very true - at one point she had the whole nation talking about her obsessive, jealous, bunny-boiling behaviour.

The high points:

Throwing herself at Victor on Day 2
Throwing herself at Stu-pid on Day 3
Getting booted out after 2 weeks and having a face like a smacked arse about it (saved by the bedsit twist of course)
Being jealous all the time
Singing Pie Jesu
Being a bitch about bread making
Being a bitch generally
Throwing a flip flop when Ahmed saw right through her
Being a bunny boiler
Being more of a bunny boiler
Turning up at Stu-pids eviction night dressed like a 16 year old tart...



Oh, the list is endless... ”


I wondered how long it would be before john john made a comment.

Like I said to cougar everyone is entitled to their opinion I just don't happen agree with it. I liked Michelle in the house I found her very entertaining and honest unlike a lot of the others. We all see different qualities in different people. I don't think she threw herself at anyone, she knew what she wanted and wasn't afraid to go for it. If Stuart hadn't been interested he could of told her where to go but he didn't, he didn't want to. He might only be 20 but you don't go onto BB if you're shy and retiring and lack confidence. Stuart is a lot more confident than people give him credit for and knew exactly what he was doing with Michelle, that's why they are still together now. No amount of money can make you stay or live with someone that you don't want to be with. Just imagine the amount of money he would of made had he dumped Michelle when he first left the house. The tabloids would have bee falling over themselve to offer it to him. He could have made just as much money on his own.

Oh and as for Ahmed if I had been in that house with him he would of had more than a flip flop thrown at him and I wouldn't have missed!
TwinklyAngel
23-12-2004
[quote=john-john]VeryTurning up at Stu-pids eviction night dressed like a 16 year old tart...

Sorry how did michelle look like a tart at stuarts eviction?
Trashcan
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“Very true - at one point she had the whole nation talking about her obsessive, jealous, bunny-boiling behaviour.

The high points:

Throwing herself at Victor on Day 2
Throwing herself at Stu-pid on Day 3
Getting booted out after 2 weeks and having a face like a smacked arse about it (saved by the bedsit twist of course)
Being jealous all the time
Singing Pie Jesu
Being a bitch about bread making
Being a bitch generally
Throwing a flip flop when Ahmed saw right through her
Being a bunny boiler
Being more of a bunny boiler
Turning up at Stu-pids eviction night dressed like a 16 year old tart...



Oh, the list is endless... ”

And this is why she should've won dear boy..
cougar 662
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by Trashcan:
“And this is why she should've won dear boy..”


Oh of course she should have won Trash, she should have romped away with the title really....... but oh hang on..... I think maybe youve overlooked one small detail.

She received the highest amount of votes ever in BB history from viewers wanting her OUT of the house.... hmm looks like youre not exactly in the majority.... but then Michelle fans have always been a strange hybrid....a bit like the geeky trainspotters of the reality tv world...a subculture almost.
Trashcan
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“Oh of course she should have won Trash, she should have romped away with the title really....... but oh hang on..... I think maybe youve overlooked one small detail.

She received the highest amount of votes ever in BB history from viewers wanting her OUT of the house.... hmm looks like youre not exactly in the majority.... but then Michelle fans have always been a strange hybrid....a bit like the geeky trainspotters of the reality tv world...a subculture almost. ”

Calling me a geek?

It was the same freakazoids that voted her out that voted for the pride of Scotland Cameron to win. that's the kind of f****d up world we live in
kaz1
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“Oh of course she should have won Trash, she should have romped away with the title really....... but oh hang on..... I think maybe youve overlooked one small detail.

She received the highest amount of votes ever in BB history from viewers wanting her OUT of the house.... hmm looks like youre not exactly in the majority.... but then Michelle fans have always been a strange hybrid....a bit like the geeky trainspotters of the reality tv world...a subculture almost. ”


I'm certainly not a geek. I'm just a normal hardworking mother of two who just happens to like Michelle as well as a lot of the other housemates. Nothing strange about that. Our opinions on her just differ and that's fine.
anna123
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by cougar 662:
“Oh of course she should have won Trash, she should have romped away with the title really....... but oh hang on..... I think maybe youve overlooked one small detail.

She received the highest amount of votes ever in BB history from viewers wanting her OUT of the house.... hmm looks like youre not exactly in the majority.... but then Michelle fans have always been a strange hybrid....a bit like the geeky trainspotters of the reality tv world...a subculture almost. ”

Jeez do you have to always result in slaggin off people on here just coz you dont agre with them?
I like michelle but i didnt actually vote for her to stay on the week she was evicted coz i was pritty much resigned to the fact she was going not because i thought she deserved to but becasue of the the "hate campaigns" going on on the outside. Anyways if you hate her so much why do you insist on going on about her months after the show has finished? I didnt like ahmed jason or becki but i dont go on and on about them all day long coz i wouldnt wanna waste my breath! I prefer to talk about people that i did actually like!
Surely calling people geeks that you have never even met is a bit extreme?!
john-john
23-12-2004
Originally Posted by tomorrow:
“What a poor excuse for a thread imo.

Why? What's the point?”

Oh dear, time for your Christmas Prozac I think...
cougar 662
23-12-2004
So anyway has everyone done their Christmas shopping?
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map