Originally Posted by CaroUK:
“He has his moments in the way he behaves - but his business instincts are very good!
Most of the others seem threatened by him and don't like him because of that.... and they shoot themselves in the foot by not listening to his advice/ suggestions.
If only Hannah had listened to him about the prices of their bouquets insted of the gormless Gbemi, they would have wiped the floor with the other team - they only needed to sell a couple of bouquets at the higher prices and that £12 difference would have been overturned.
Mind you Hannah paid the price of not bringing her pals back in with her..... instead of bringing the weakest candidates who did the least on the task - she brought in two of the four strongest contenders (the others are Harry H and Hayley). If she had done any homework on the main programme - she would have known that where the PM brings back the wrong candidates - they leave themselves vulnerable to firing. LS doesn't like being set up to fire a good candidate!
Had she brought Lewis and Gbemi back - I'm pretty sure Gbemi would have gone as two boys have gone already, although Lewis is so poor that he might just have gone anyway. Let's hope the others have learned from that!
Harry is very obviously trying to rein back his behaviour as his card is marked with LS. The others have made the mistake of thinking that this means he will go if he is taken back to the boardroom.....that won't happen unless he really IS responsible for any future losses!”
Hannah had more logic than that - but it was the wrong logic. Zara
had made what seemed the most obvious tactical mistake .Actually the big strategic error was pricing which Zara and called right - but Hannah was responsible for that one, so couldn't go there, even if she recognised it. Hannah also repeatedly went back to the theme of wanting team players who would work in her team. Harry was disruptive, and Zara didn't follow instructions, so, in that sense, they were the ones to pick .She had been complimented on running the team well, and probably did enough to survive against weaker opposition in the boardroom, so from her viewpoint the non team players were the ones to take in.
The problem is where she arrived at fitted the teamwork logic, but didn't ask who had made the smart business calls, or showed some abilities, or contributed most of the profits or who was articulate enough to beat her easily in a boardroom argument..
To be fair though, she did spot that Harry had past form which might have gone against him and she may not have seen enough of some people like Lewis in ineffective action to argue against him - even if liking him wasn't an issue. She might have wondered if she ahd enough ammunition on anyone else even if she had identified who looked weaker and more likely to be fired.