• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
If they bring back anyone it should be
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
erront55
09-11-2011
No one.
CloudyE
09-11-2011
Johnny should be returned, I heard a rumour that it will be The Risk though in the Daily Mail but how tru that it anyone can guess.

If it is true, the show WILL be down the pan, people will finally see it for a contrived load of tosh.
JamesehASR
09-11-2011
Bring back a piece of shit on a string.
hilduffluva
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by casa_nova:
“Either give one of the four eliminated in the first week a chance to return to the show. Public vote 1 back in = Amelia returning.

Or Gary picks someone from boys judges house = Lascal Woods to enter the competition.

Unfortunately 'The Risk can't come back' neither can Johnny as makes a mockery of whole show as others can say they were not bottom 2 week they got eliminated and will open a whole can of worms.”

wont happen...purely because he got booted off at Boot Camp!
exodus2u
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by lady*tara:
“It should be James,he wasnt voted out,and its 1 of garry's acts that have gone,so it should be 1 of garry's acts brought back.”

How could they bring anyone back but someone from the Boys category?
galena
09-11-2011
Or maybe they might bring back Jade? Have there been any more sightings of Kelly and the X Factor bus in Fife
RecordPlayer
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by casa_nova:
“Either give one of the four eliminated in the first week a chance to return to the show. Public vote 1 back in = Amelia returning.

Or Gary picks someone from boys judges house = Lascal Woods to enter the competition.


Unfortunately 'The Risk can't come back' neither can Johnny as makes a mockery of whole show as others can say they were not bottom 2 week they got eliminated and will open a whole can of worms.”

Why should it be someone from Gary's group? He made the wrong decision by choosing Frankie in the first place, therefore he's forfeited his right.

It should really be Johnny - he was the last to be eliminated.

Last to leave - first to return.
Parneb
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by ModernPrimate:
“Johnny, yes... definitely he would be the one to bring back. Like I said, if they want the show to be some way credible they shouldn't do it, but if they do bring back anyone it should be Johnny.

I wonder if there's any chance they'd bring Jedward back as a wildcard into the show. They would have no chance of winning, unlike Johnny, so it wouldn't really be unfair on the other contestants. ”

I agree with bringing back Johnny, but NOT those mega annoying twins....YUK!
bouncer11
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by RecordPlayer:
“Why should it be someone from Gary's group? He made the wrong decision by choosing Frankie in the first place, therefore he's forfeited his right.

It should really be Johnny - he was the last to be eliminated.

Last to leave - first to return.”

Frankie has left the show but not via the public vote.
Johnny left as he was in the bottom 3 and for all we know, he may have got less votes than Kitty.
So if someone does return it should be someone from Garys Boys. and as you seem to thing the rule is "last to leave - first to return" Then the last boy to leave was James.
RecordPlayer
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by bouncer11:
“Frankie has left the show but not via the public vote.
Johnny left as he was in the bottom 3 and for all we know, he may have got less votes than Kitty.
So if someone does return it should be someone from Garys Boys. and as you seem to thing the rule is "last to leave - first to return" Then the last boy to leave was James.”

As an act in last weeks show!

Johnny may well have got less votes than Kitty which doesn't change anything because he left. Anyway it was between those two, Johnny and KItty.
Had Kitty left than she would have returned. It's only fair doing it that way.

What's the point of bringing in someone new?
bouncer11
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by RecordPlayer:
“As an act in last weeks show!

Johnny may well have got less votes than Kitty which doesn't change anything because he left. Anyway it was between those two, Johnny and KItty.
Had Kitty left than she would have returned. It's only fair doing it that way.

What's the point of bringing in someone new?”

I'm not sure what your understanding of the word "Fair" is

Although the public didn't vote Johnny out, they didn't vote enough to keep him safe and in the end every judge, including his mentor,voted him off.
RecordPlayer
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by bouncer11:
“I'm not sure what your understanding of the word "Fair" is

Although the public didn't vote Johnny out, they didn't vote enough to keep him safe
and in the end every judge, including his mentor,voted him off.”

That's because one act HAS to be eliminated each week...

Johnny had more votes than the other contestants that were eliminated before him in previous weeks.

Johnny was the latest - of course it's fair to bring him back and I'm not particularly a Johnny fan either.
bouncer11
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by RecordPlayer:
“That's because one act HAS to be eliminated each week...

Johnny had more votes than the other contestants that were eliminated before him in previous weeks.

Johnny was the latest - of course it's fair to bring him back and I'm not particularly a Johnny fan either.”

Well with your understanding of the word "Fair" I hope you never get called up for jury service.
RecordPlayer
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by bouncer11:
“Well with your understanding of the word "Fair" I hope you never get called up for jury service.”

M'Lord, are you comparing XFactor to a Court case?
bouncer11
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by RecordPlayer:
“M'Lord, are you comparing XFactor to a Court case? ”

No, M'Lord is questioning your understanding of the word "Fair"
But as were going to go around in cirles on this one, let's just agree to disagree
fish_mitten
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by RealityReal31:
“Agreed. Plus I doubt anyone would be annoyed with him coming back, he was so gracious in his defeat. Admittedly they could bring back one of the eliminated acts (Amelia, Jonjo, James or 2 Shoes) but that would be completely unfair as they would have skipped all the performances to get to the final 7. (Plus I can't see them doing that, as it would undermine the Judges' decision if they won).”



...hardly a reason to bring him back ...louis voted him off so he clearly feels he doesn't have the potential of mad kitty
RecordPlayer
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by bouncer11:
“No, M'Lord is questioning your understanding of the word "Fair"
But as were going to go around in cirles on this one, let's just agree to disagree ”

Agreed

It'll be interesting to see who they will bring back.
bouncer11
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by RecordPlayer:
“Agreed

It'll be interesting to see who they will bring back.”

Well I've just seen the "McDonald Brothers" and the "Conway Sisters" entering the Xfactor offices. So I'm thinking there going to have a sing off on the weekend
storking
09-11-2011
If they really want to make the competition serious and based on talent (stage 1 complete with frankie gone ) then they shouldn't bring Johnny back. He'd continue doing laughable routines that make him look like a joke rather than a talented singer.

I think they should carry on without bringing anyone back but after all the twists we've had this series.. it's highly likely they'll find a way to bring someone back.
saabsaab
09-11-2011
Pop idol.
melvin_m_melvin
09-11-2011
Bring Back Sophie
jeopardy1965
09-11-2011
I think James has to be brought back. It's the only fair thing to all concerned - Gary and the voters in particular.
jackbell
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by jeopardy1965:
“I think James has to be brought back. It's the only fair thing to all concerned - Gary and the voters in particular.”

Quite the opposite of fair you mean.

No-one should be brought back.
benami311
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by bouncer11:
“Well with your understanding of the word "Fair" I hope you never get called up for jury service.”

Right, because it's fairer to bring someone in who was deemed "not good enough" by the judges for the live shows and give them a free pass to the Top 7. Your understanding of the word "fair" is lacking more than anyone else's on this thread, perhaps because of some preference for James to begin with. With that attitude, I hope you're not called for Jury service because you would twist the circumstances to fit your own preference.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map