Yet more X Factor drama. All press time with Johnny Robinson has now been cancelled. He is SO going back in.
web • 11/9/11 10:44 AM
This from Anna pointer editor of star.
web • 11/9/11 10:44 AM
This from Anna pointer editor of star.
Johnny Robinson press interviews cancelled
1 of 3
He would obviously be the fairest one to return.
However, I wouldnt say it means he is going back into the show.
Its just as likely that he , like most contestants, doesnt have the media training to cope with the inevitable questioning and fallout of yesterday, his interviews would be about frankie, not him, so it makes sense even without the huge jump to 'hes going back'
However, I wouldnt say it means he is going back into the show.
Its just as likely that he , like most contestants, doesnt have the media training to cope with the inevitable questioning and fallout of yesterday, his interviews would be about frankie, not him, so it makes sense even without the huge jump to 'hes going back'
Means little, I expect they have been cancelled them because he's no doubt only going to be asked about Frankie constantly.
or the PRs are all busy with the Frankie situation.
or the PRs are all busy with the Frankie situation.
Originally Posted by spkx:
“Means little, I expect they have been cancelled them because he's no doubt only going to be asked about Frankie constantly.”
“Means little, I expect they have been cancelled them because he's no doubt only going to be asked about Frankie constantly.”
But Johnny didn't have anything to do with the Frankie situation, so it would have no point questioning him about something hew knew nothing about, seeing as he left the house on Monday.
They took money for a vote which was advertised as deciding a bottom three from which two would be eliminated.
Originally Posted by slowdown:
“But Johnny didn't have anything to do with the Frankie situation, so it would have no point questioning him about something hew knew nothing about, seeing as he left the house on Monday.”
“But Johnny didn't have anything to do with the Frankie situation, so it would have no point questioning him about something hew knew nothing about, seeing as he left the house on Monday.”
That's not quite how the press work, not to mention the alleged drug use was during the weekend.
Originally Posted by Alicey:
“Are The Risk still getting interviewed?”
“Are The Risk still getting interviewed?”
Just in X Factor's The Risk join Alexandra Burke and Joe McElderry for the Cheshire Oaks Designer Outlet tree lighting ceremony
Entertainment News • 11/9/11 10:40 AM
Lmao
Originally Posted by Blue Aardvark:
“They took money for a vote which was advertised as deciding a bottom three from which two would be eliminated.”
“They took money for a vote which was advertised as deciding a bottom three from which two would be eliminated.”
Actually they took money for a vote for the public to save their favourite from the bottom 3. The Risk got the least amount of public votes and so were eliminated straight away. However, Johnny was eliminated based on the Judges decision, I bet he didn't come 2nd last in the voting as well.
That would be utter madness!! Just supposing they bring him back, he will have less time to rehearse, he could be in the bottom 2 on Sunday and then leave again.
Not only is it rediculous, it would look embarassing for Johnny and the show!
Not only is it rediculous, it would look embarassing for Johnny and the show!
Originally Posted by spkx:
“Means little, I expect they have been cancelled them because he's no doubt only going to be asked about Frankie constantly.
or the PRs are all busy with the Frankie situation.”
“Means little, I expect they have been cancelled them because he's no doubt only going to be asked about Frankie constantly.
or the PRs are all busy with the Frankie situation.”
All interviews have been cancelled as there all recording the "Wishing On A Star" video.
I don't know why anyone should be surprised if Johnny were to be brought back. He would be the fairest choice for a start. The Risk got the least votes and for all we know Johnny may have polled more than Kitty.
It doesn't tend to follow that the contestant in the bottom two (or three in this case) one week is there the next, unless they're particularly unpopular or particularly bad which Johnny is neither.
Originally Posted by NightFalls:
“That would be utter madness!! Just supposing they bring him back, he will have less time to rehearse, he could be in the bottom 2 on Sunday and then leave again.
Not only is it rediculous, it would look embarassing for Johnny and the show!”
“That would be utter madness!! Just supposing they bring him back, he will have less time to rehearse, he could be in the bottom 2 on Sunday and then leave again.
Not only is it rediculous, it would look embarassing for Johnny and the show!”
It doesn't tend to follow that the contestant in the bottom two (or three in this case) one week is there the next, unless they're particularly unpopular or particularly bad which Johnny is neither.
How is this the fairest decision? He clearly hasn't got enough support to win the show, so he'd be back out of it straight away. How about we vote for one to go back in out of the bunch the JUDGES (not us, remember) dropped in the first live show. At least that wouldn't be a foregone conclusion.
Originally Posted by Motorbiking:
“I don't know why anyone should be surprised if Johnny were to be brought back. He would be the fairest choice for a start. The Risk got the least votes and for all we know Johnny may have polled more than Kitty.
It doesn't tend to follow that the contestant in the bottom two (or three in this case) one week is there the next, unless they're particularly unpopular or particularly bad which Johnny is neither.”
“I don't know why anyone should be surprised if Johnny were to be brought back. He would be the fairest choice for a start. The Risk got the least votes and for all we know Johnny may have polled more than Kitty.
It doesn't tend to follow that the contestant in the bottom two (or three in this case) one week is there the next, unless they're particularly unpopular or particularly bad which Johnny is neither.”
You have a very warped understanding of the word "FAIR"
Originally Posted by Smerph:
“How is this the fairest decision? He clearly hasn't got enough support to win the show, so he'd be back out of it straight away. How about we vote for one to go back in out of the bunch the JUDGES (not us, remember) dropped in the first live show. At least that wouldn't be a foregone conclusion.”
“How is this the fairest decision? He clearly hasn't got enough support to win the show, so he'd be back out of it straight away. How about we vote for one to go back in out of the bunch the JUDGES (not us, remember) dropped in the first live show. At least that wouldn't be a foregone conclusion.”
I think the one that would be voted through would be a foregone conclusion (Amelia) but whoever it was would only last a couple of weeks as other contestants have already picked up support.
Originally Posted by Smerph:
“How is this the fairest decision? He clearly hasn't got enough support to win the show, so he'd be back out of it straight away. How about we vote for one to go back in out of the bunch the JUDGES (not us, remember) dropped in the first live show. At least that wouldn't be a foregone conclusion.”
“How is this the fairest decision? He clearly hasn't got enough support to win the show, so he'd be back out of it straight away. How about we vote for one to go back in out of the bunch the JUDGES (not us, remember) dropped in the first live show. At least that wouldn't be a foregone conclusion.”
On the basis you could say get rid of everyone else (incl Misha and Little Mix) except Janet, Craig and Marcus as everyone else has been bottom 2 so cannot win.
In previous years acts have been last in the voting one week and top the next - not saying Johnny will win it but one week in the bottom 3 is hardly curtains.
Originally Posted by Smerph:
“How is this the fairest decision? He clearly hasn't got enough support to win the show, so he'd be back out of it straight away. How about we vote for one to go back in out of the bunch the JUDGES (not us, remember) dropped in the first live show. At least that wouldn't be a foregone conclusion.”
“How is this the fairest decision? He clearly hasn't got enough support to win the show, so he'd be back out of it straight away. How about we vote for one to go back in out of the bunch the JUDGES (not us, remember) dropped in the first live show. At least that wouldn't be a foregone conclusion.”
That would be fairer. Although the public didn't vote Johnny out, they didn't give him enough votes to keep him safe. No-one knows if he got more or less votes than Kitty and when he was in the bottom 2 even his mentor voted him out.
Why would he want to lose or his dignity to risk being chucked of at the first opportunity.
Originally Posted by bouncer11:
“You have a very warped understanding of the word "FAIR"”
“You have a very warped understanding of the word "FAIR"”
Really?
What do you propose to be the fairest solution...
Originally Posted by MARTYM8:
“On the basis you could say get rid of everyone else (incl Misha and Little Mix) except Janet, Craig and Marcus as everyone else has been bottom 2 so cannot win.
In previous years acts have been last in the voting one week and top the next - not saying Johnny will win it but one week in the bottom 3 is hardly curtains.”
“On the basis you could say get rid of everyone else (incl Misha and Little Mix) except Janet, Craig and Marcus as everyone else has been bottom 2 so cannot win.
In previous years acts have been last in the voting one week and top the next - not saying Johnny will win it but one week in the bottom 3 is hardly curtains.”
Little mix have never been bottom two.
Originally Posted by RealityReal31:
“Really? What do you propose to be the fairest solution...”
“Really?
What do you propose to be the fairest solution...”
To be honest, I'm not sure. But whatever decsion they make will be unfair for some of them.
Originally Posted by bouncer11:
“To be honest, I'm not sure. But whatever decsion they make will be unfair for some of them.”
“To be honest, I'm not sure. But whatever decsion they make will be unfair for some of them.”
That's true, but surely Johnny would be the fairest. It is arguable that he wouldn't even have been in the bottom if wasn't for the double elimination (In Week 7, Alexandra was third from the bottom and went on to win it). Plus he actually worked his way through the past 5 weeks to get that far.
One of the original 4 (Amelia, James etc.) would just get to skip all those performances and live shows, and suddenly be in the top 7. Hardly fair...
1 of 3
