• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
Bring back Johnny & it gets even more unfair
MysteriousOz
09-11-2011
Why cant they just leave as it is and make a Plan B

Johnny is going to get a wave of sympathy votes and survive possibly to the final ( although they wouldnt let him win)

This happened on Big Brother one year in Australia, slightly different one contestant Bree was booted out but it was revealed the next day that she wasnt the lowest so she went back in and another guy who should have left did. She went from average popularity to finish 2nd overall!!

If I was any of the other acts id be pretty annoyed that their chance at the final has decreased

Maybe just accept that they tried to change things it didnt work now take a week off the public voting ( even if it does cost alot, serves them right)

The 6 acts left deserve an even playing field
Malbren
09-11-2011
But if they'd stuck to one eviction johnny may not even have been in the bottom two, prob have been The Risk & Kitty...so it is fair to bring him back imo.
ForGodsSake
09-11-2011
BRING JOHNNY BACK !
He was the most entertaining one on there!
actually
09-11-2011
so it was fair to bring ashford back .. who we know was in the bottom 2 ?


bringing back johnny is the fair option .. james micheal should not be allowed to have 5 weeks off the competition then to return ..

if johnny came back he would not have missed a show ....
Green Goddess
09-11-2011
If I were Johnny I would refuse, his own mentor booted him off, how could you want to come back after that show of no confidence from your own mentor.
troy4783
09-11-2011
please dont bring him back it would not be fair in the other acts he would defo finish like top 3 if he came back
Andybear
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by Malbren:
“But if they'd stuck to one eviction johnny may not even have been in the bottom two, prob have been The Risk & Kitty...so it is fair to bring him back imo.”

We don't know this though - Johnny may have had less votes than Kitty so he might have been in the bottom two anyway. Regardless of this, he still was in the bottom three, ie, several other contestants had more votes than him. (I can't remember how many were left in after the double elimination, hence saying "several"!) So my guess is that he isn't as popular as people on here make him out to be.
Malbren
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by Andybear:
“We don't know this though - Johnny may have had less votes than Kitty so he might have been in the bottom two anyway. Regardless of this, he still was in the bottom three, ie, several other contestants had more votes than him. (I can't remember how many were left in after the double elimination, hence saying "several"!) So my guess is that he isn't as popular as people on here make him out to be.”

It seems from posts on various threads etc that it was the case, obv its not confirmed but people saying sorces say etc.....so it would be the fairest decision.

Misha B was once in bottom 2 early weeks and hasnt been since, its possible people thought Johnny would be safe going off how bad frankie, janet were etc and saved their votes, doesnt mean they woulnt now realise he needs our votes and goes from strength to strength.
Andybear
09-11-2011
I have to be honest and say I'm biased as I don't see what all the fuss is about Johnny. I don't find him in the slightest bit entertaining; I just find him creepy.
DanClegg
09-11-2011
I don't think it's really that unfair if they bring Johnny back. We know the Risk were bottom this week so if this had been any other week, Johnny would probably have been fine (although, definitely gone if in a sing-off). In terms of fairness, all they need to do is refund anyone who voted for Frankie - otherwise, it's not a vote to evict so nobody would have spent money for Johnny to be in the bottom.

To make it interesting and arguably fairer though, I think Johnny should be assigned to Gary if he does return. Gary has been going on about Louis ruining Johnny for weeks so would be interesting to see what he did with him and in fairness to Gary, he also had three acts so should still have three acts.
benami311
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by Andybear:
“I have to be honest and say I'm biased as I don't see what all the fuss is about Johnny. I don't find him in the slightest bit entertaining; I just find him creepy.”

I agree with you, but also am of the opinion that if they were to bring back a previous contestant to rejoin the Top 6, then he would be the fairest option. Then I would just have to suffer through his performance(s) until his (hopefully) upcoming elimination.
Generalissimo
09-11-2011
Don't think it's unfair just completely pointless, both the public and the judges have already decided that he's not good enough to win the competition so all they would be doing is bringing back a loser, further damaging what is left of the credibility of the show, what if he was to come back and on Sunday both he and Kitty were in the bottom 2 (highly likely), then we would have the same vote off as last week, what a complete waste of time.

If anyone was to be brought back ( Which I don't think they should), then it should be someone who hasn't had the chance to be judged by the public.
Andybear
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by benami311:
“I agree with you, but also am of the opinion that if they were to bring back a previous contestant to rejoin the Top 6, then he would be the fairest option. Then I would just have to suffer through his performance(s) until his (hopefully) upcoming elimination.”

Fair point, though I wouldn't suffer through his performance - I'd go and make a cup of coffee or something when he was on!
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map