• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
Good job X Factor!
ShadowRider213
09-11-2011
They've axed three contestants in a single week. Meaning that only six acts remain for the show dated 12 November, with the final slated for 4 December. That means the Christmas number one won't be clinched by an X Factor winner!
Unless:
-up to two acts are reinstated
-the winner somehow gets three weeks on top
rbdcay
09-11-2011
Well this is news...no wait let me see is there a thing called a search button on here?
bouncer11
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by ShadowRider213:
“They've axed three contestants in a single week. Meaning that only six acts remain for the show dated 12 November, with the final slated for 4 December. That means the Christmas number one won't be clinched by an X Factor winner!
Unless:
-up to two acts are reinstated
-the winner somehow gets three weeks on top”

They were never working towards a xmas number this year.
yohinnchild
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by ShadowRider213:
“They've axed three contestants in a single week. Meaning that only six acts remain for the show dated 12 November, with the final slated for 4 December. That means the Christmas number one won't be clinched by an X Factor winner!
Unless:
-up to two acts are reinstated
-the winner somehow gets three weeks on top”

There is enough contestants for 2 acts to be in the final - as was the case in series 1,2 and 4

The final is not the 4th dec, its the week after - with the single released the following week so XMas number 1 will be accessible
ShadowRider213
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“Well this is news...no wait let me see is there a thing called a search button on here?”

Seriously, I was posting an "assumption".
rbdcay
09-11-2011
Originally Posted by ShadowRider213:
“Seriously, I was posting an "assumption".”

That has been made in several other threads...
actually
09-11-2011
pointless thread
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map