Originally Posted by Green Goddess:
“I have to agree with some of what you say, as so many of the winners end up the losers from this show. Cher is doing well however it is only my opinion here I just dont know why she is doing so well, not my cuppa tea at all.Frankie is already plying for trade, god alone knows how he has swung that, the show is not even over... and surely he has contractual issues, unless that was the deal, they get him out and he does what he likes, he always had why change the trend, lol.
As for young James I think the lad has a memorable unique voice, looks at home on that stage at the GAY club and works the crowd really well, hardly what we saw on the X factor, where he looked more like a frightened mouse, but you know what I said before the show even began he would be out, and from his face he knew it as well, which was really sad. I hope he is back, as for me he can sing and play guitar, he may not be a bad lad, but do we really need another one, or bad lass for that matter. Maybe just someone who would work hard and give it their best shot.
GG”
I think Cher is doing well largely due to her personality and the fact that she is 'relevant'. Highlighting even more that the X Factor really does not have any idea about what works in the real music world. With James , I agree that he seems like a nice and hard working guy , but the X factor just seems so wrong for him as a career move as I can't envisage him being a successful act off the back of this show. X Factor is particularly harsher to the male acts as on the show they're almost always trump the girls and come out the victors but in the real world they get the rude awakening that when you get votes on superficial grounds , which unfortunately they do from certain people , a large part of those votes and support only last as long as the next time someone comes along , which is the following year.
With James , it's like I'm looking at Matt Cardle again. Without the ungratefulness and smugness.