|
||||||||
Why do I get the feeling the UK version is a testing ground? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,020
|
Why do I get the feeling the UK version is a testing ground?
I'm starting to get the feeling the producers are trying out new twists on the UK version to see how they go down before moving them to the American version. If the big drop at Boot Camp had been successful we would've seen it appear in the US version next year. We've already seen the top 16 cut being used on both the UK and US versions, with the UK as a test run, and now I think this later 're-introduction' twist is to measure the public's reaction and, if it goes well vote and ratings wise, they'll use it on the US version if required.
From being the leading series of the show, I'm of the opinion that the UK show is little more than a lab rat now. The US is key for Syco. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
I'm starting to get the feeling the producers are trying out new twists on the UK version to see how they go down before moving them to the American version. If the big drop at Boot Camp had been successful we would've seen it appear in the US version next year. We've already seen the top 16 cut being used on both the UK and US versions, with the UK as a test run, and now I think this later 're-introduction' twist is to measure the public's reaction and, if it goes well vote and ratings wise, they'll use it on the US version if required.
From being the leading series of the show, I'm of the opinion that the UK show is little more than a lab rat now. The US is key for Syco. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 1,168
|
Its definately an interesting thought! However I dont think they can really say that considering it was Simon's only version of the show he was a part of for 7 years...X Factor wise.
I think in this series they just have had some bad luck, trial and error. Remember though Contraversy Creates Cash! All brings publicity! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,020
|
Quote:
If they try these underhand tricks in the USA they will be sued left right and centre. I hope they go bankrupt.
It's far too late to do this, though. After a couple of weeks, I can accept, but past the halfway point??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,020
|
Quote:
Its definately an interesting thought! However I dont think they can really say that considering it was Simon's only version of the show he was a part of for 7 years...X Factor wise.
I think in this series they just have had some bad luck, trial and error. Remember though Contraversy Creates Cash! All brings publicity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 1,168
|
Quote:
He's now part of the American version, though, and financially that has to be a success. No doubt ITV and FOX are both putting pressure on Simon to return next year, and there's no doubt where he'll be come the autumn of 2012. Why risk harming they're new baby when they can test trial a few things on the OAP to see if it works?
![]() Neither Ch 4 or Brian Dowling had it right at first. Its just trial and error till they got the right formula. Same with X Factor UK without Cowell |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 39,227
|
They've always used the UK as a testing ground, inviting Paula Abdul as a guest judge in series three was a test for the four judge line up to come in series four with the introduction of Dannii Minogue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,192
|
US versions of shows are notorious for changing things for the sake of it, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,020
|
Quote:
I dont think the show NEEDS Simon Cowell. Its good to have him there but its kind of like Channel 4 when they first axed Big Brother or coincidentally when BB announced Davina wasnt coming back. Channel 4 finally seem to be finding replacements and Brian Dowling is fitting in to Davinas place.
Neither Ch 4 or Brian Dowling had it right at first. Its just trial and error till they got the right formula. Same with X Factor UK without Cowell Quote:
They've always used the UK as a testing ground, inviting Paula Abdul as a guest judge in series three was a test for the four judge line up to come in series four with the introduction of Dannii Minogue.
Quote:
US versions of shows are notorious for changing things for the sake of it, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,842
|
i think the initial live show idea of each judge losing an act was definitely a test run.
I don't think this week is a test run though for USA, I think it's just a decent enough twist that's fallen into place |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,020
|
Quote:
i think the initial live show idea of each judge losing an act was definitely a test run.
I don't think this week is a test run though for USA, I think it's just a decent enough twist that's fallen into place The first week twist was nearly brilliant. All it needed was a public vote...but then if it had that they wouldn't have been able to do this twist now. Hmmm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
I don't think so. The top 16 thing wasn't trialled on X Factor UK, it was always going to happen on both shows this year. And the big bootcamp cull has been done on America's Got Talent.
This is just a reaction to current events. They've spotted an opportunity to get something out of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,020
|
Quote:
I don't think so. The top 16 thing wasn't trialled on X Factor UK, it was always going to happen on both shows this year. And the big bootcamp cull has been done on America's Got Talent.
This is just a reaction to current events. They've spotted an opportunity to get something out of it. I'd argue that the two X Factor's are closer to each other than Got Talent is to the singing contest. FOX want the American version to be as successful as the British version was; if Simon's nervous about something, why not give it a trial run first on the version that's smaller in importance? I have the feeling if the twist had completely died over here, they would've shoehorned the public vote into the American show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
Quote:
I don't understand why they didn't involve the public in the twist, unless they saw the opportunity to have acts on 'standby'.
I'd argue that the two X Factor's are closer to each other than Got Talent is to the singing contest. FOX want the American version to be as successful as the British version was; if Simon's nervous about something, why not give it a trial run first on the version that's smaller in importance? I have the feeling if the twist had completely died over here, they would've shoehorned the public vote into the American show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
In terms of television, I think you'll find the UK is just one big testing ground for American shows a lot of the time. The US remakes our shows far more than we remake theirs and usually the writers/producers/execs etc. are doing their best on the UK version in the hope that it will be picked up for a US version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,020
|
Quote:
My guess is that the idea might have actually started in the US. They needed a week of shows between judges houses and proper live shows but could only do a performance show (World Series Baseball was on Wednesday and Thursday). So they came up with this "top 16" judges elimination twist and the UK show tried it as well. Of course, they could have done the public vote on the UK show. But judges voting has tended to be quite controversial in the past.
I would still say the UK version is a measuring stick for the US version; to prevent the US version taking too many risks in it's fledgling season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6,522
|
Quote:
I don't understand why they didn't involve the public in the twist, unless they saw the opportunity to have acts on 'standby'.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
I'm starting to get the feeling the producers are trying out new twists on the UK version to see how they go down before moving them to the American version. If the big drop at Boot Camp had been successful we would've seen it appear in the US version next year. We've already seen the top 16 cut being used on both the UK and US versions, with the UK as a test run, and now I think this later 're-introduction' twist is to measure the public's reaction and, if it goes well vote and ratings wise, they'll use it on the US version if required.
From being the leading series of the show, I'm of the opinion that the UK show is little more than a lab rat now. The US is key for Syco. But in terms of twists being "tested" on the UK for the US... that's kind of impossible to prove with the US version being brand new. Give the same argument in a year or two (if either, or both versions are even still on the air) and we shall see. In terms of the "top 16 cut", by the way, the US use of that was SO close on the heels of the UK version's use, its clear they were conceived and carried out on both pretty much simultaneously. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:21.


