Does lola lose the baby? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,196
|
As this isn't real I think they should have Lola lose her baby because it'll be stupid to have Billy as a great grandfather anyway. I think they should develop Lola as a character before she has a baby, maybe find her mother, more detail about her dad.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 337
|
Yea we havent even had the chance to get to know the character and slap bang were supposed to care about her being pregnant
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Services: Team Rachel and Bookie to the finish line!!
Posts: 22,314
|
I haven't seen this in the spoilers, but I kind of wondered if this was the route they were going to go down. I can't see them lumbering her with a baby just when she's starting to bloom into a half-decent character, and the fact that she actually wants the unexpected baby doesn't bode well.
Nobody ever wants their baby in Eastenders. They either hate the idea until the child is born, or desire it and then lose it. (See Ronnie Mitchell!) |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 337
|
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s2...e-balance.html this from the 9th dec just after Shes involved in some accident but doesnt say what
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 337
|
So much is coming up at xmas i cant keep up doent think theirs ever been a xmas on ee with so many things happening to almost everyone lol
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,204
|
I think its something to do with Phil I think he thinks she is his stalker when he sets up a sting and knocks her over.
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:03.



