Why do they keep saying crap like "fill stadiums" etc. when obviously the public dont agree.
Why dont they just get it?
Why dont they just get it?
Why cant judges smell the coffee?
1 of 3
Originally Posted by imahottie:
“Why do they keep saying crap like "fill stadiums" etc. when obviously the public dont agree.
Why dont they just get it?”
“Why do they keep saying crap like "fill stadiums" etc. when obviously the public dont agree.
Why dont they just get it?”
Who could fill Madison Square Garden, Misha or Janet.
I think Misha will appeal more to Americans than she is appealing to the Brits.
Because they're all morons who can't seem to comprehend that the public doesn't warm to out of tune bullies.
It's the fact that they used "connecting with the audience" as a reason to chuck Kitty off, but then conveniently forget all about Misha being bottom two for the third time.
Originally Posted by TTTango:
“Who could fill Madison Square Garden, Misha or Janet.”
“Who could fill Madison Square Garden, Misha or Janet.”
That's deeply unfair. Misha isn't that large.
Originally Posted by TTTango:
“Who could fill Madison Square Garden, Misha or Janet.
I think Misha will appeal more to Americans than she is appealing to the Brits.”
“Who could fill Madison Square Garden, Misha or Janet.
I think Misha will appeal more to Americans than she is appealing to the Brits.”
it aint so square its round ,
only thing misha fills is the bottom 2
Originally Posted by oxygenjj:
“it aint so square its round ,
only thing misha fills is the bottom 2”
“it aint so square its round ,
only thing misha fills is the bottom 2”
As innaccurate as it is unfunny.
The fact is, people who watch The X Factor aren't necessarily the same people who will go to see the performances. The acts each have individual fanbases.
Misha and Janet don't need the support of every idiot who believes everything they read and don't believe words coming from the person themselves after the show.
How well they did on X Factor stops making a difference to their careers at this point. Those who are gonna get signed, will get signed, and their fans will go to see them.
Misha and Janet don't need the support of every idiot who believes everything they read and don't believe words coming from the person themselves after the show.
How well they did on X Factor stops making a difference to their careers at this point. Those who are gonna get signed, will get signed, and their fans will go to see them.
They seem to change the rules for voting in the bottom 2 every week. One week it's based entirely on the sing off performance. THe next it is based on the saturday show and the sing off. Then it is based on who can sell albums and has a better look. Then it is based on who has a recording voice since that is what we are looking for and sometimes they judge it on just who looks better and more like a superstar on the stage. THey just make it up on the whim depending on who they want to put through and give a reason that gives them an advantage. Didn't sing well? That's okay we can save you with how you look on the stage. Don't look great tonight? It's okay, with you it's all about the voice.
Originally Posted by imahottie:
“Why do they keep saying crap like "fill stadiums" etc. when obviously the public dont agree.
Why dont they just get it?”
“Why do they keep saying crap like "fill stadiums" etc. when obviously the public dont agree.
Why dont they just get it?”
answer , because they are to busy drinking champagne
Originally Posted by mtj:
“It's the fact that they used "connecting with the audience" as a reason to chuck Kitty off, but then conveniently forget all about Misha being bottom two for the third time.”
“It's the fact that they used "connecting with the audience" as a reason to chuck Kitty off, but then conveniently forget all about Misha being bottom two for the third time.”
That's so true, I'm no Janet fan but she didn't deserve to go tonight over someone who has been in the bottom two four times.
Originally Posted by F1etch:
“They seem to change the rules for voting in the bottom 2 every week. One week it's based entirely on the sing off performance. THe next it is based on the saturday show and the sing off. Then it is based on who can sell albums and has a better look. Then it is based on who has a recording voice since that is what we are looking for and sometimes they judge it on just who looks better and more like a superstar on the stage. THey just make it up on the whim depending on who they want to put through and give a reason that gives them an advantage. Didn't sing well? That's okay we can save you with how you look on the stage. Don't look great tonight? It's okay, with you it's all about the voice.”
“They seem to change the rules for voting in the bottom 2 every week. One week it's based entirely on the sing off performance. THe next it is based on the saturday show and the sing off. Then it is based on who can sell albums and has a better look. Then it is based on who has a recording voice since that is what we are looking for and sometimes they judge it on just who looks better and more like a superstar on the stage. THey just make it up on the whim depending on who they want to put through and give a reason that gives them an advantage. Didn't sing well? That's okay we can save you with how you look on the stage. Don't look great tonight? It's okay, with you it's all about the voice.”
maybe the producers need to make it crystal clear to us
make the rules crystal clear
Originally Posted by laura:):
“That's so true, I'm no Janet fan but she didn't deserve to go tonight over someone who has been in the bottom two four times.”
“That's so true, I'm no Janet fan but she didn't deserve to go tonight over someone who has been in the bottom two four times.”
What does that have to do with anything? So, now, you want the judges to add "number of times in the bottom two" to the list of excuses they use to kick off acts?
The hypocrisy is incredible.
Janet has sucked for the past 5 weeks. Get over it.
Originally Posted by TammyTam:
“What does that have to do with anything? So, now, you want the judges to add "number of times in the bottom two" to the list of excuses they use to kick off acts?
The hypocrisy is incredible.
Janet has sucked for the past 5 weeks. Get over it.”
“What does that have to do with anything? So, now, you want the judges to add "number of times in the bottom two" to the list of excuses they use to kick off acts?
The hypocrisy is incredible.
Janet has sucked for the past 5 weeks. Get over it.”
Because the show is called "The X factor" and she clearly doesn't have it, otherwise she wouldn't keep ending up in the bottom two. The public don't want her there and the judges should listen. How many times are they going to keep saving her??
Originally Posted by Smithy57:
“As innaccurate as it is unfunny.”
“As innaccurate as it is unfunny.”
she has a canny knack of knowing where the bottom 2 is
sorry lost count of how many times
will have to get my abacus out
Originally Posted by laura:):
“Because the show is called "The X factor" and she clearly doesn't have it, otherwise she wouldn't keep ending up in the bottom two. The public don't want her there and the judges should listen. How many times are they going to keep saving her??”
“Because the show is called "The X factor" and she clearly doesn't have it, otherwise she wouldn't keep ending up in the bottom two. The public don't want her there and the judges should listen. How many times are they going to keep saving her??”
As many times as it takes. It's also a "singing competition" and Misha can sing. It's not a "popularity contest" and frankly, each time they save Misha, it's a big well-deserved f*ck you to the foolish public.
Originally Posted by TammyTam:
“What does that have to do with anything? So, now, you want the judges to add "number of times in the bottom two" to the list of excuses they use to kick off acts?”
“What does that have to do with anything? So, now, you want the judges to add "number of times in the bottom two" to the list of excuses they use to kick off acts?”
Not a Janet fan at all, but I could list a number of acts they have used that very excuse for. Kitty, Rachel A etc. etc.
Personally I think it is one of the more relevant reasons to say bye bye to an act
Given that Janet was in the bottom two the audience isn't exactly hot on her either.
Little fact you guys seem to forget.
Little fact you guys seem to forget.
Originally Posted by TammyTam:
“As many times as it takes. It's also a "singing competition" and Misha can sing. It's not a "popularity contest" and frankly, each time they save Misha, it's a big well-deserved f*ck you to the foolish public.”
“As many times as it takes. It's also a "singing competition" and Misha can sing. It's not a "popularity contest" and frankly, each time they save Misha, it's a big well-deserved f*ck you to the foolish public.”
She can sing, but she doesn't have the X factor, if she did she wouldn't keep being in the bottom two, accept it. The public don't like her and keeping her in makes a mockery of the show. Why have it so the public can vote when their vote doesn't matter?
Misha has the X-factor more than any other contestant she performs like a pro.
Not saving her would make a mockery out of the show.
Not saving her would make a mockery out of the show.
Originally Posted by oxygenjj:
“she has a canny knack of knowing where the bottom 2 is
sorry lost count of how many times
will have to get my abacus out”
“she has a canny knack of knowing where the bottom 2 is
sorry lost count of how many times
will have to get my abacus out
”
As you don't seem to have both oars in the water I'll spell it out for you. The bottom two - unsurprisingly - consists of two people, of which Misha (or anyone) can only constitute one, therefore not filling it.
1 of 3
