• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here!
So...Emily bottom 2
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Heavenly
27-11-2011
Back luck producers, shoving this ridiculous fauxmance down our throats doesn't seem to be working.

I hope and pray Mark and Emily don't try and up their game.
yorkie11
27-11-2011
Originally Posted by Heavenly:
“Back luck producers, shoving this ridiculous fauxmance down our throats doesn't seem to be working.

I hope and pray Mark and Emily don't try and up their game. ”

I'm pretty sure they will up their game. I don't mind Emily but I wish she had gone just to put a stop to this cringeworthy showmance.
MARTYM8
27-11-2011
Is the other 'it might be you' actually the person who was second last in the vote. From the results of previous series it isn't always the case.

They may want to save Emily for a few more days - if she is the 'it might be you' they think more people will vote to keep her if she is at risk. Emily is probably near the bottom - but not actually second last in the voting tonight!

Maybe I am just too cynical!
Verence
27-11-2011
The way I see it Lorraine and Emily must have had the third and fourth fewest votes yesterday so the producers knew there was a danger of one of them going tonight. They also knew that Fatima would get a "survivor's bounce" after her performance against Pat.

So what did they do??

Virtually edit Lorraine out of existence and make sure that Emily gets plenty of airtime by getting her to do a Celebrity Chest with Mark.
Heavenly
27-11-2011
Originally Posted by MARTYM8:
“Is the other 'it might be you' actually the person who was second last in the vote. From the results of previous series it isn't always the case.

They may want to save Emily for a few more days - if she is the 'it might be you' they think more people will vote to keep her if she is at risk. Emily is probably near the bottom - but not actually second last in the voting tonight!

Maybe I am just too cynical!”

Probably not.
AA2009
27-11-2011
Originally Posted by Verence:
“The way I see it Lorraine and Emily must have had the third and fourth fewest votes yesterday so the producers knew there was a danger of one of them going tonight. They also knew that Fatima would get a "survivor's bounce" after her performance against Pat.

So what did they do??

Virtually edit Lorraine out of existence and make sure that Emily gets plenty of airtime by getting her to do a Celebrity Chest with Mark.”

Except for the fact that the lines had already closed before the Celebrity Chest was shown. But don't let that get in the way of crazy editing conspiracies.
Order
27-11-2011
The bottom two isn't always the bottom two. Obviously, the person who gets eliminated is correct, but sometimes, the other person is random.

This happened in Gino's year with Kim. Kim hit the bottom two once, if I remember correctly, but was never in the "it might be you" selection. The same thing also happened to Dom twice in Stacey's year. Just a couple of examples.
AJW210892
27-11-2011
I hope Emily stays tommorow night.
SillyBillyGoat
27-11-2011
Originally Posted by Order:
“The bottom two isn't always the bottom two. Obviously, the person who gets eliminated is correct, but sometimes, the other person is random.

This happened in Gino's year with Kim. Kim hit the bottom two once, if I remember correctly, but was never in the "it might be you" selection. The same thing also happened to Dom twice in Stacey's year. Just a couple of examples.”

Just done a check. Kim was never in the bottom two. She came 2nd every day apart from Day 17, where she was 3rd.
Crawley Cutie
27-11-2011
" bottom" - being the operative word.
Truth Teller
27-11-2011
Originally Posted by Heavenly:
“Back luck producers, shoving this ridiculous fauxmance down our throats doesn't seem to be working.

I hope and pray Mark and Emily don't try and up their game. ”

Yep
tippitoe
27-11-2011
Originally Posted by Heavenly:
“Back luck producers, shoving this ridiculous fauxmance down our throats doesn't seem to be working.

I hope and pray Mark and Emily don't try and up their game. ”

Ye Gods I hope not....mind you they dont have to when they get to play the chest thingy....if you know what I mean
AA2009
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by AJW210892:
“I hope Emily stays tommorow night.”

Me too.
brylcreem
28-11-2011
I like Emily, she wasn't shown on the show at all today whilst the voting lines were open so I don't know what people are complaining about. She seems like a nice girl too, but she is attractive and young so digital spy have to hate...
Kyomii
28-11-2011
Emily is potentially losing votes to all the screaming Mark female fans out there - they won't like the romance. Also, the fake thing - as we only see an extremely small percentage of what is going on, no one can state it is fake, because you don't know that it is.

If you saw the full unedited 24 hours you could make better judgement then. The same was said about Andre/Price, and yet that was not fake, but so glad Peter woke up and smelled the coffee of Price's utter manipulation.
The Net
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by Kyomii:
“Emily is potentially losing votes to all the screaming Mark female fans out there - they won't like the romance. Also, the fake thing - as we only see an extremely small percentage of what is going on, no one can state it is fake, because you don't know that it is.

If you saw the full unedited 24 hours you could make better judgement then. The same was said about Andre/Price, and yet that was not fake, but so glad Peter woke up and smelled the coffee of Price's utter manipulation.”

Sorry but how do you lose votes from "Mark's screaming fans"

Wouldn't they be voting for ....er Mark?
LIZALYNN
28-11-2011
Who is voting for WIllie and Dougie? We see so little of them doing or saying anything interesting.
I don't mind Mark and hats off to Emily for her trial the other day. But a lot of airtime was given to their chest trial.
Jungle romances never last and as on other reality shows romances can be very boring to watch in my opinion.
maureens
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by Kyomii:
“Emily is potentially losing votes to all the screaming Mark female fans out there - they won't like the romance. Also, the fake thing - as we only see an extremely small percentage of what is going on, no one can state it is fake, because you don't know that it is.

If you saw the full unedited 24 hours you could make better judgement then. The same was said about Andre/Price, and yet that was not fake, but so glad Peter woke up and smelled the coffee of Price's utter manipulation.”

IM not a "screaming" Mark fan but i do like him but I think also Mark will lose votes as if people are like me there is nothing worse than watching showmances on a reality show(yes i believe it is fake), this year's Big Brother we had to stomach 3 of them that has put me off for life!
Heavenly
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by brylcreem:
“I like Emily, she wasn't shown on the show at all today whilst the voting lines were open so I don't know what people are complaining about. She seems like a nice girl too, but she is attractive and young so digital spy have to hate...”

Not at all, it's Mark I don't like, I don't mind her, but it's this fauxmance that is being shoved down our throats, sending them off on the chest together...bouncy castle...covered in slime, falling on each other.....:yawn:
conchie
28-11-2011
I think the only time this series that the bottom two called out WERE the bottom two was Pat and Fatima. They had to be, given the trial.

On all other occasions the second person called out as "it might be you" are random !! There is a strategy too I imagine to who they pick. Perhaps someone they want the public to suddenly start voting more for, or just to keep them generally on their toes in the camp, and not let any group start to feel more safe than another. Its a good move........makes them all work a bit harder for it.
staceyxxx23
28-11-2011
Who hasn't been in the bottom two now then?

Is it just Jess, or has Mark not been there either?
Its-Gillian
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by Order:
“The bottom two isn't always the bottom two. Obviously, the person who gets eliminated is correct, but sometimes, the other person is random.

This happened in Gino's year with Kim. Kim hit the bottom two once, if I remember correctly, but was never in the "it might be you" selection. The same thing also happened to Dom twice in Stacey's year. Just a couple of examples.”

This! shaun ryder mentions this in his autobiography, too!
Its-Gillian
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by staceyxxx23:
“Who hasn't been in the bottom two now then?

Is it just Jess, or has Mark not been there either?”

Mark hasn't or dougie or antony, they're the only ones i can remember atm
Crazyeyeskiller
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by AA2009:
“Except for the fact that the lines had already closed before the Celebrity Chest was shown. But don't let that get in the way of crazy editing conspiracies.”

I know, the editing conspricay theorists are truly frightening.
AA2009
28-11-2011
Originally Posted by brylcreem:
“I like Emily, she wasn't shown on the show at all today whilst the voting lines were open so I don't know what people are complaining about. She seems like a nice girl too, but she is attractive and young so digital spy have to hate...”

Glad to see someone else likes her, the hate she's getting is ridiculous. It's not like her and Mark even have a romance, they've just flirted a bit in what I've found a fairly amusing way (and I don't even like Mark that much)...but if two young people are shown talking to each other DS has to shout "FAUXMANCE!!!" and go crazy about it (and even if they are being shown too much it's not their fault, it's the editors.) I even enjoyed the bouncy task.

But the conspiracy stuff here is nuts, look at how the BB forum turned out with every thread about about the "bias" against Aaron...even after he won! I wish people could just relax a bit.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map