Originally Posted by BuddyBontheNet:
“Well I like James and was glad he spoke out about JS in Series 6 because personally I think JS taking part is one of the reasons the show started going down hill. Now the producers hope for JS character every series and some people like this kind of celeb and some don't. I don't.”
I look at from a kinda different angle

Given that before JS we had had Chris Parker and Julian Clary in the final and also Fiona Phillips and even Peter Schmeichel making it further than their ability would suggest, just why did JS going on a week or 2 over his ability make the difference. He did 7 dances, and for 3 of those he wasn't bottom of the judges leaderboard.
For me, series 6 as a whole was the most bad tempered series of all and the JS situation was just a small part of the overall. Granted for a week it took on epic proportions, but I think it was just the middle part of a tetchy whole - for which I hold the dance off responsible.

Voting to 'put one over on the judges' by keeping the lowest marked out the bottom 2 meant the ones the judges had taken a bit of a shine to found themselves towards the bottom and being kept more than their seeming popularity would agree with just kept the whole saga going right up to the very end.
People say the board has changed this year, but honestly it has nothing on series 6 when it was a minefileld out there!
Quote:
“I have no idea why anyone would call him a bad tempered bully, unless they are harking back to his first series on the show and there were reasons for this that were certainly not all down to James. On the Pro Tour James was lovely and clearly Ola is the boss.”
I do sometimes wonder how James would have fared if Georgina had been his second partner rather than his first. Brendan was lucky, really, that he had Sarah in his second series when the goodwill he had from his whole series one story was still fresh. James came into a similar sort of partnership cold and those first impressions count.