Originally Posted by rzt:
“I agree that they will always be vulnerable to those headlines. But I think the press will report on any ratings decline much more with Alesha on board than if say, someone like Danni was hired, because newspapers just love the whole BBC ITV/ex-BBC rivalry thing. Personally I think they should've just gone with a safer name for the 4th spot without all the fuss or hype. Simon Cowell returning and David Walliams coming in should generate enough pre-launch hype/buzz anyway so I don't see why they had to bring Alesha into the equation too.”
These days, it's all about the girls when it comes to the tabloids (Cowell perhaps being the exception) and she'll get a lot more coverage than Walliams for sure. I actually favoured a 2:1 female:male ratio for that reason (at least before Cowell came back). They might have a different angle for their ratings reports, but it was always going to be there, particularly after X Factor. For Cowell, it might mean that if the ratings are down a lot, some of the heat falls on Alesha rather than just him!
The main thing with Walliams might actually be getting him on chatshows - he does those all the time anyway and he's good at it so he might get them some exposure that way.
Even though BGT did alright last year, I still feel it might need a push to start with. It ended on quite an underwhelming note both in terms of the winner and the ratings.
Quote:
“For me, Britain's Got Talent, more than TXF, is about the acts rather than the judges. The original 3 lineup of Simon, Amanda and Piers wasn't particularly that tabloid friendly (Simon aside) nor did they argue much or drum up controversy with fake arguments etc IIRC but the show worked well. After the launch onwards, the most important thing is about getting the talent selection right and having one or two contestants who will generate a lot of buzz and press coverage (Paul Potts, Susan Boyle) which in turn will result in higher ratings. To be fair to Alesha, I think she comes across pretty well from what I've seen of her and she may well turn out to be a hit with viewers, but I just think weighing everything up, there's more cons than pros with her appointment. But anyway, for the next series it's imperative that for the first time in 2-3 years they get the talent selection and contestant stories spot on, and that IMO will mostly determine whether the series soars or sinks after the initial launch. The talent last time was pretty dire, they need to improve it significantly next time to keep the show on top of its game, especially with a potential rival programme airing around the same time too (The Voice).”
I agree that Alesha could do well on the panel - she seems loud and laughs a lot - she'd have been all wrong for X Factor (as was rumoured) but BGT is meant to be that bit lighter. Holden being in the middle as well is the only thing making me doubt it a bit.
The talent is definitely going to be important - they need a few YouTube hits to come out of the early episodes. And I'd like to see them tinker with the later stages as well but they won't. Though I don't think a request for a US style YouTube show is too much to ask (rather than just bundling it with the auditions as they did last year). With the sole exception of series 2, they've never even come close to getting 5 half decent semi-final episodes.
Originally Posted by LRose:
“I get that but if this is some sort of exercise to fight back against Strictly then I think it's ill-judged as SCD doesn't make a big thing of the judges like XF does.
In all honesty Strictly won't miss her and BGT won't gain much from having her.
She might be better suited to BGT as she has a professional background in singing so at least should have some input to give there but I do feel ITV/Syco have wasted a place on the BGT panel that could've gone to someone who'd really make a difference.”
Nobody else that has been linked would be making a huge amount of difference, tbh. Dannii would have brought some tabloid talk from her previous stint on X Factor, Alesha brings tabloid talk from her role on SCD. As judges, I think they'd both be fine.
I doubt Strictly will miss her and the only potential issue is if they pick the wrong replacement (but Arlene makes that easy for them if they want!).