• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 29)
<<
<
7 of 144
>>
>
sn_22
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“The Weakest Link killed off CBBC on BBC1 and shows suffered moving to 4.30pm - they really should have limited the impact by moving them to 4.50pm and sacrificing Newsround in a 4.40pm slot.

I think CBBC gets higher ratings than CBBC on BBC1 anyway. Children have grown up with it and I do think it's difficult to argue against the moving of kids shows to CBBC - although I'd like to see BBC1 reinstate a Saturday morning show so they don't disappear completely - and I think a classic style Saturday morning show would need to be on BBC1 to work.”

The post-school slot has been becoming increasingly irrelevant for years now. Bringing in The Weakest Link might have sped the process up, but it was always going in one direction. In a good 5.15 slot on CBBC, Blue Peter might well match or even exceed it's current numbers. In fact, all of CBBC's top 10 last week rated higher than BP's series average. If the show does wilt and die on CBBC, it'll be because the programme itself has sadly become an anachronism, not because of the schedule.

My own suggestion in terms of retaining a children's presence on BBC One would be to look at some 'crossover' programming for weekend teatimes - 5-6pm or so. Lost Christmas (commissioned by CBBC) tomorrow looks like it could be a good model for that. As would more shows in the vein of the Sarah Jane Adventures.

It wouldn't be a regular 'CBBC slot' because that puts off older children and adults, but just occasional CBBC-commissioned series where they fit. It always seems weird to me how the BBC's contribution to kids TV is always measured solely by how some specified hours perform, and ignores the massive kids audiences for Doctor Who just because thats not branded as CBBC. My model would involve fewer hours than a Saturday morning show, but I think it would make a much bigger impact.

Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Re Downton, there was an interview with Fincham in the Times Magazine today. Main premise of the piece was how fantastic Downton is, that people are getting used to this sort of quality on ITV now (really? ), and it's going to triumph in the festive ratings. So, no spoiling tactics or a seasonal gift to the nation even if suicidally scheduled - it's been put there to win - straight from the horse's mouth!”

I read that too. A glowing review of Fincham (who, for the record, I think is an excellent controller and has done a very solid job at ITV, as he did at the BBC) which did rather gloss over most problems, aside from a mention of Daybreak.

But it just goes to show what an enormous impact a big show can have on perceptions of an entire channel. Or, at least, a genre on that channel. There's simply no number of modest 4-6m primetime hits that could buy ITV that sort of boost to their reputation - simply because the newspapers just wouldn't notice.
iaindb
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by sn_22:
“The post-school slot has been becoming increasingly irrelevant for years now. Bringing in The Weakest Link might have sped the process up, but it was always going in one direction. In a good 5.15 slot on CBBC, Blue Peter might well match or even exceed it's current numbers. In fact, all of CBBC's top 10 last week rated higher than BP's series average. If the show does wilt and die on CBBC, it'll be because the programme itself has sadly become an anachronism, not because of the schedule.
”

I'm quite surprised that Blue Peter isn't already on the CBBC channel. But it's been given a good slot there so maybe this will give it a new lease of life.
Fudd
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“But they showed it just 4 months ago, also on a Saturday night, in pretty much the same slot! That episode of George Gently that the BBC repeated last weekend hadn't been shown since May 2010.

I don't object to them showing a film repeat opposite the Strictly final as they obviously can't compete with it, but that title should have been at the bottom of their list since they literally just showed it. Other family movies do exist. By repeating Harry Potter again so soon they are probably shooting themselves in the foot in the long run. I know these films will always repeat well but they could go from being strong 5m+ raters to mediocre 3m+ raters very easily.”

Trouble is, what would do better? The Half Blood Prince, admittedly, as that'd be a premiere but they have that lined up opposite EastEnders and Sherlock on New Years Day - that could be an interesting battle!

ITV are accepting defeat but want some respectability and The Order of The Phoenix should at least give them that.
Brekkie
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by sn_22:
“My own suggestion in terms of retaining a children's presence on BBC One would be to look at some 'crossover' programming for weekend teatimes - 5-6pm or so. Lost Christmas (commissioned by CBBC) tomorrow looks like it could be a good model for that. As would more shows in the vein of the Sarah Jane Adventures.”

I do agree with that idea - Sarah Jane especially would make a lot more sense in a 5.30pm slot on Saturday nights than alot of the filler BBC1 play there. And when I was a kid the more high end childrens shows would get a Sunday evening slot - I think the BBC's last adaptation of The Borrowers might have played there, along with things like Just William etc.

Originally Posted by iaindb:
“I'm quite surprised that Blue Peter isn't already on the CBBC channel. But it's been given a good slot there so maybe this will give it a new lease of life.”

I think it's been on and off the channel a lot in the last decade - at one point on every weeknight at 6pm, with some shows premiering on CBBC or exclusive to CBBC. At the moment I think it's just repeated at weekends.

The final throw of the dice for me for Blue Peter would be to Top Gear it - make it an hour long weekly show, perhaps get an audience in, and just make it all that little bit bigger. There is obviously the small matter of the budget to think about, but on location and in studio stunts have long been a staple of the show. It could have a 6pm slot on the CBBC channel, it could perhaps get an hour long weekend slot on BBC2. Blue Peter though has a habit of actually finding it's feet again everytime you think it's at deaths door.

And they definately need to scrap the idea of aiming it at 6-12 year olds - it's real potential audience is probably the uncool young teenagers!


Back to ratings and I guess we might get some BBC HD ratings this weekend for Strictly in 3D. Did we get any figures for Wimbledon in 3D or indeed anything on Sky 3D?
GeorgeS
17-12-2011
Just back from the new Sherlock Holmes movie. not much on tv tonight. At least BBC4 have a good doc on the Antartic.
Chris1964
17-12-2011
Blue Peter probably resonates far more with people over 35 than it does with its target audience. At least as far as the name is concerned.
Once a national institution with presenters every bit a star as those that appeared after 7.00-now lost in a multitude of other programmes aimed at children. Sad for people of my age probably, but just a sign of the times really.
ronant
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“Just back from the new Sherlock Holmes movie. not much on tv tonight. At least BBC4 have a good doc on the Antartic.”

The BBC's brilliant isn't it? Proving brilliant programmes like Strictly for the masses, and something more niche for you. Agreed though, nothing on elsewhere.
RobbieSykes123
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“Just back from the new Sherlock Holmes movie. not much on tv tonight. At least BBC4 have a good doc on the Antartic.”

Best get yourself an early night so you can be up bright and early tomorrow to grouse and snipe at the overnights in your own inimitable fashion...
RobbieSykes123
17-12-2011
Come to think of it George, you could be watching the car crash of Jessie J at the Strictly final....

Score
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Come to think of it George, you could be watching the car crash of Jessie J at the Strictly final....

”

Was she that bad? She was dreadful on TXF a few weeks ago too. I don't think she's a good live performer at all.
Charnham
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Come to think of it George, you could be watching the car crash of Jessie J at the Strictly final....

”

promotion for The Voice obviously
garyessex
17-12-2011
Never watched SCD before but my God they've taken lessons from TXF on pointless filler. :yawn:
grahamzxy
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by garyessex:
“Never watched SCD before but my God they've taken lessons from TXF on pointless filler. :yawn:”

Viewers seem to love or hate SCD, (just like TXF) you know within 15 minutes if it is your thing. The reason for the time filling is costume changes or indeed changing the set a little. As always there is room for improvement. I am however expecting overnights of

12.6m main show
13.0m results


They do seem high, but I am expecting them to be close.
Agent F
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by garyessex:
“Never watched SCD before but my God they've taken lessons from TXF on pointless filler. :yawn:”

Yeah it seemed a little padded in places. I too don't usually watch Strictly but it was good tonight - I can see why people would opt for it over X Factor. It's a warmer show. Not as dour or po-faced as XF has become.
Fudd
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Best get yourself an early night so you can be up bright and early tomorrow to grouse and snipe at the overnights in your own inimitable fashion... ”

Pot, meet kettle.
Andy23
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Best get yourself an early night so you can be up bright and early tomorrow to grouse and snipe at the overnights in your own inimitable fashion... ”

Of course before the ratings do come in, make sure that someone predicts that SCD will get about 15 million, so the high rating that it does get can be spun as poor!
Chris1964
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by Agent F:
“Yeah it seemed a little padded in places. I too don't usually watch Strictly but it was good tonight - I can see why people would opt for it over X Factor. It's a warmer show. Not as dour or po-faced as XF has become.”

Agree there-even if they have bigged the show up in the last two years, there is a unique kind of warmth to Strictly. I think It Takes Two helps in that way too.
GeorgeS
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by Agent F:
“Yeah it seemed a little padded in places. I too don't usually watch Strictly but it was good tonight - I can see why people would opt for it over X Factor. It's a warmer show. Not as dour or po-faced as XF has become.”

Nazi rallies had a nice warm feeling from all the torches and book burning. It still doesnt make me want to attend one though.
LRose
17-12-2011
Strictly has a brilliant feel good quality to it.

XF imo lost the feel good factor a good couple of series ago. When a show begins to take itself too seriously it's never a good thing and always spells disaster.
Charnham
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“Nazi rallies had a nice warm feeling from all the torches and book burning. It still doesnt make me want to attend one though. ”

I cant believe you just compared Strictly to a Nazi rally, this thread really should never be evoking Godwins Law, its only TV after all.

No mater how bad the ITV Flop Zone gets, it wont be as bad as Hitler.
Chris1964
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“Nazi rallies had a nice warm feeling from all the torches and book burning. It still doesnt make me want to attend one though. ”

One of the more unusual Ratings Thread analogies there George!
Fudd
17-12-2011
Maybe it says a lot about The X Factor that it's Strictly's night yet we're somehow still talking about it.
dan2008
17-12-2011
Strictly has been Brilliant
I never thought id say the day that something would be better to watch than EastEnders
I've even made Enders take a back seat this week in order to catch up with IT Takes Two and the live shows

Anyway hope for some massive ratings for tonight.
The winner was very well deserved
wizzywick
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by dan2008:
“Strictly has been Brilliant
I never thought id say the day that something would be better to watch than EastEnders
I've even made Enders take a back seat this week in order to catch up with IT Takes Two and the live shows

Anyway hope for some massive ratings for tonight.
The winner was very well deserved”

BBC1 was brilliant all night tonight. I can't remember a more entertaining schedule for ages! I predict nearly 14 million for the SCD final.
Andy23
17-12-2011
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Maybe it says a lot about The X Factor that it's Strictly's night yet we're somehow still talking about it.”

TXF & BGT seem to be discussed round here pretty much every week of the year!
<<
<
7 of 144
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map