Originally Posted by gussiecat:
“Tis the season to be jolly fa lla la lala lala laaa.
Over the last few days I have seen the thread at its best. Lots of well balanced discussion from our regular posters. I have really enjoyed the sensible posts, where discussion has been allowed. This includes support of Josie and ohn aswell as looking at possible flaws of the pair. I agree to a certain extent that some of the more extreme loys and muckers tweets should be ignored, however this is a place of discussion and many people enjoy that, in fact some of the now less regular posters only come on to say their own piece ( some would say to criticise our views) in times of discussion and never come on during times of banter as they obviously prefer else where to do their banter. This is fine, this is their prerogative obviously. I know some others dont do the banter aswell. My confusion is why ,if people object with everything that is posted on here unless it is in line with what they think, why do they not just ignore as sometimes it appears that they dont want to join in a discussion as their tone suggests they think we are all stupid for not agreeing with them,? Why dont they do as suggested and ignore posts that they see as critical? Now I am not suggesting that discussion stops. This is a great place for it, at its best when people like Killingtime, Pickles, Wendy, 2Judy, Miljo, andycb and a host of others have civil debates looking at both sides of the argument . I am merelt wondering why when some posters obviously think disparaging thoughts and have low opinions of our opinions do they continue to post on a thread that obviously annoys them. It certainly isnt for the discussion.
Anyway just pondering the complexities of human thinking.”
Why don't you say who you mean and maybe they'll answer your question.