|
||||||||
No Wild Card................ |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Office
Posts: 2,452
|
No Wild Card................
I wonder why..........Shame, as it would have made good viewing and lots of revenue for the show.if it had been put to public vote..................lost opportunity IMO
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Posts: 10,373
|
yep. and would have brought it up to the 'usual' ten contestants
nine is such a weird figure to be starting with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: York
Posts: 853
|
its gotta be a multiple of three though...
you can't have one judge with more contestants because then their liklihood of winning would be greater... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by anneonholiday
its gotta be a multiple of three though...
you can't have one judge with more contestants because then their liklihood of winning would be greater... That is a goo point ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Posts: 10,373
|
well maybe a dozen then
i see your point about one of the judges having an unfair advantage |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Watching wind farms
Posts: 24,049
|
I would have loved a way to get Lloyd back in...I'm sure lots of people feel the same about Andy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,291
|
It would be rather a nice touch to put it to vote and allow a 10th contestant but as the public choice not tied to any judge. I quite like the idea of no judge winning
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Posts: 10,373
|
oh i like your thinking
the public say 'no simon/sharon/louis you were wrong about this act' then because they were wrong, they get no affiliation then they win because the public think of them as their act pure mischief ![]() but the act would have no 'mentor' (should that be tormentor?) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Watching wind farms
Posts: 24,049
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zelana
It would be rather a nice touch to put it to vote and allow a 10th contestant but as the public choice not tied to any judge. I quite like the idea of no judge winning
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,141
|
I totally agree. Put a few novelty acts back in like the Chicken factory worker and Gemini. Followed by Lloyd, Odis and Andy and you have a quality show where entertainment is rife.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bournemouth
Posts: 65,105
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlueOne
I totally agree. Put a few novelty acts back in like the Chicken factory worker and Gemini. Followed by Lloyd, Odis and Andy and you have a quality show where entertainment is rife.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zelana
It would be rather a nice touch to put it to vote and allow a 10th contestant but as the public choice not tied to any judge. I quite like the idea of no judge winning
![]() A gold star for you. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:47.


