DS Forums

 
 

No Wild Card................


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17-10-2004, 13:19
chrisb52
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Office
Posts: 2,452

I wonder why..........Shame, as it would have made good viewing and lots of revenue for the show.if it had been put to public vote..................lost opportunity IMO

chrisb52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 17-10-2004, 13:37
~V~
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Posts: 10,373
yep. and would have brought it up to the 'usual' ten contestants

nine is such a weird figure to be starting with.
~V~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 13:47
anneonholiday
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: York
Posts: 853
its gotta be a multiple of three though...

you can't have one judge with more contestants because then their liklihood of winning would be greater...
anneonholiday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 13:47
I_love_this
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by anneonholiday
its gotta be a multiple of three though...

you can't have one judge with more contestants because then their liklihood of winning would be greater...

That is a goo point !
I_love_this is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 15:43
~V~
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Posts: 10,373
well maybe a dozen then

i see your point about one of the judges having an unfair advantage
~V~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 15:56
ZipGypsy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Watching wind farms
Posts: 24,049
I would have loved a way to get Lloyd back in...I'm sure lots of people feel the same about Andy.
ZipGypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 15:58
zelana
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,291
It would be rather a nice touch to put it to vote and allow a 10th contestant but as the public choice not tied to any judge. I quite like the idea of no judge winning
zelana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 16:15
~V~
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Posts: 10,373
oh i like your thinking

the public say 'no simon/sharon/louis you were wrong about this act'

then because they were wrong, they get no affiliation

then they win because the public think of them as their act

pure mischief

but the act would have no 'mentor' (should that be tormentor?)
~V~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 16:16
ZipGypsy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Watching wind farms
Posts: 24,049
Originally Posted by zelana
It would be rather a nice touch to put it to vote and allow a 10th contestant but as the public choice not tied to any judge. I quite like the idea of no judge winning
Clever thing!
ZipGypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 16:33
TheBlueOne
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,141
I totally agree. Put a few novelty acts back in like the Chicken factory worker and Gemini. Followed by Lloyd, Odis and Andy and you have a quality show where entertainment is rife.
TheBlueOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2004, 16:36
ArtyAttack
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bournemouth
Posts: 65,105
Originally Posted by TheBlueOne
I totally agree. Put a few novelty acts back in like the Chicken factory worker and Gemini. Followed by Lloyd, Odis and Andy and you have a quality show where entertainment is rife.
Sounds great. Can we have clowns too or do we have to just settle on Louis, Simon and Tabby?
ArtyAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2004, 00:56
JonDoe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
Originally Posted by zelana
It would be rather a nice touch to put it to vote and allow a 10th contestant but as the public choice not tied to any judge. I quite like the idea of no judge winning
Excellent idea.

A gold star for you.
JonDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:47.