• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
I accept Ben is the lone stalker
VivaLaLamb
28-12-2011
However some stuff just doesnt add up.... First the USB stick all that was on this, was Phils confession he was involved in Kevin Wicks death....

Next the carlot fire.... The police never linked this to Phil so Jack would have not known about this at the time of the fire Only Phil, Frank and Pat knew what really happened...

I do remember Pat telling Janine what happened but cant quite remember if she told her before or after Phil began getting stalked anyone remember?

So my big Question is how did Ben know about Phil being involved in the carlot fire?... how did he obtain original photo's of the homeless man?

also people saying its obvious it was Ben because of the christmas tree being on fire, the tree was outside not inside..

so if anyone has any theories regarding this please post im interested in what people think about all this
CherryRose
28-12-2011
Phil was not involved in Kevin Wicks death, he was involved providing a contact to sell Kevin some dodgy cars. The night Kevin died he knew the type of veichle that he was driving as he stole it off Yolanda and then decided to play about with it.

It is possible that Ben may have known about the car lot fire with him been a Mitchell as I am sure Kathy knew about it. That does not account for how he came to be in possession of photos of the person that died in the car lot.

As for

Spoiler
Ben's apparently going to point the finger at Phil over Stellas death.


that does not make sense.
Otis Hill
28-12-2011
@CherryRose regarding your spoiler, i believe it is DCI Marsden that manipulates him into doing so. Also i agree with u that the only way ben could know about the fire is if Kathy told him. But that seems like an awful burden to put on a young child as Ben was 10 when she died so she wud have to have told him before then. unless she left him a letter from beyond the grave with all the info he needed on the fire.....
walford-e20
28-12-2011
Originally Posted by CherryRose:
“Phil was not involved in Kevin Wicks death, he was involved providing a contact to sell Kevin some dodgy cars. The night Kevin died he knew the type of veichle that he was driving as he stole it off Yolanda and then decided to play about with it.

It is possible that Ben may have known about the car lot fire with him been a Mitchell as I am sure Kathy knew about it. That does not account for how he came to be in possession of photos of the person that died in the car lot.

As for

Spoiler
Ben's apparently going to point the finger at Phil over Stellas death.


that does not make sense.”

I agree that it makes no sense, as there was CCTV to prove otherwise! I even found the episode on YouTube and watched the footage of it myself. There is no way the storyline can take this turn and maintain any credibility.
Oldnjaded
28-12-2011
I have no idea what this sl is about. As other posters have said, Ben would not have had all this information and frankly he hasn't got the brains to collect all these photos, compile a complicated plot etc. not to mention there's no flippin' reason why he should do. If he's not happy in the Square because his dad hates him being gay, then he should move elsewhere. He must have known this would all come out sooner or later. What's he playing at ffs??

Conclusion : another rubbish storyline
VivaLaLamb
28-12-2011
I didnt know Kathy knew about the carlot fire? this storyline had great potential then they ruined it by making ben the stalker
woot_whoo
28-12-2011
Originally Posted by VivaLaLamb:
“I didnt know Kathy knew about the carlot fire? this storyline had great potential then they ruined it by making ben the stalker”

As far as I can recall (and feel free to correct me, anyone with a better memory!), Kathy did NOT know about the fire at the time - or rather, we never saw or got told that she knew. I assume people are just guessing that she must have known or found out offscreen, and then told her young child all about it offscreen, in order for Ben to know. Either way, I think it's us trying to rationalise what is a nonsensical 'reveal'. Not quite as bad as Darren being Heather's babydaddy, but just as physically impossible.
SULLA
28-12-2011
Originally Posted by VivaLaLamb:
“However some stuff just doesnt add up.... First the USB stick all that was on this, was Phils confession he was involved in Kevin Wicks death....

Next the carlot fire.... The police never linked this to Phil so Jack would have not known about this at the time of the fire Only Phil, Frank and Pat knew what really happened...

I do remember Pat telling Janine what happened but cant quite remember if she told her before or after Phil began getting stalked anyone remember?

So my big Question is how did Ben know about Phil being involved in the carlot fire?... how did he obtain original photo's of the homeless man?

also people saying its obvious it was Ben because of the christmas tree being on fire, the tree was outside not inside..

so if anyone has any theories regarding this please post im interested in what people think about all this”

So how can you accept Ben is the lone stalker.

You would have to accept that the writing of EE is deeply flawed......which I do
VivaLaLamb
28-12-2011
Should be renamed Benenders every reveal in eastenders seems to be Ben
richter
28-12-2011
Originally Posted by VivaLaLamb:
“Should be renamed Benenders every reveal in eastenders seems to be Ben”

Or Benbenders

AMIRITE?
AMIRITE? ?

Boomboom
VivaLaLamb
28-12-2011
Originally Posted by richter:
“Or Benbenders

AMIRITE?
AMIRITE? ?

Boomboom”

lol
Lillers
28-12-2011
Originally Posted by richter:
“Or Benbenders

AMIRITE?
AMIRITE? ?

Boomboom”

Haha, very funny.
Steven L Hunter
28-12-2011
I agree its like they couldn't be bothered to follow the storyline through so just said we'll make it Ben but maybe they have something else up their sleeve maybe Ben is covering for someone?
VivaLaLamb
28-12-2011
Originally Posted by Steven L Hunter:
“I agree its like they couldn't be bothered to follow the storyline through so just said we'll make it Ben but maybe they have something else up their sleeve maybe Ben is covering for someone?”

He could be covering for someone, because i find it very hard to believe Kathy told him all about it when he was just a child, surely him even knowing about it before Kathy died he wouldnt want to live with Phil? even if Ben isnt covering for someone SOMEBODY told him about it an if it doesnt get revealed that somebody did tell him then BK should get the sack for such a crap end to a potentionally good storyline
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map