|
||||||||
Traceys miscarriage |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
|
Traceys miscarriage
It doesn't make sense.
I am sorry but wasn't she nearly five months pregnant? When you lose babies at this stage you don't just flush em down the loo. She'd have to give birth to these babies. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
It doesn't make sense.
I am sorry but wasn't she nearly five months pregnant? When you lose babies at this stage you don't just flush em down the loo. She'd have to give birth to these babies. I heard or read that she still pregnat with one of the babies not sure if it true or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nr Glasgow
Posts: 12,757
|
Nearly 5 months, she would have needed to be induced surely? Thats a bit rediculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Team Martin and LBC Chit-Chat
Posts: 7,641
|
Quote:
Nearly 5 months, she would have needed to be induced surely? Thats a bit rediculous.
Poor Becky, if this was a real life thing and Becky lived in my road she'd be in our guest room right now and Horrible Tracey would be back behind bars. Becky hasn't got a nasty bone in her body, I wish I could be like her, a lovely person and I'm so sad that she's going out of the show. I hope that the door's open so that she can come back and poke her tongue out to all those who doubted her. Shame on you, Steve, you were married to her and you should know her better than anyone. Ridiculous? Indeed it is!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Varese, Italy
Posts: 1,911
|
Quote:
It doesn't make sense.
I am sorry but wasn't she nearly five months pregnant? When you lose babies at this stage you don't just flush em down the loo. She'd have to give birth to these babies. She was taken by ambulance from the HOTEL by ambulance to hospital- we don't know what happened there... If you think she lost them after her fall...you haven't been watching carefully enough...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,434
|
I have a real problem with this story line. Its about time the writers did proper research and stopped treating the audience like idiots. 5 months pregnant and miscarrieage I still believe she would have had to have a D & C either as an inpatient or outpatient. Lets say even if she was only in hospital for a couple of hours, there is no way she would be up and about for a few days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Home For The Bewildered
Posts: 86,545
|
The police only have to contact the hospital to find out that Becky couldn't have pushed her down the stairs to cause the miscarriage.
But, that would be too easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,371
|
I would thought so too, if she was that far gone surely as others have suggested she would have to give birth, would they not be fully formed by then, tiny but formed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14,219
|
Quote:
It's all ridiculous, the whole of the storyline is totally ridiculous.
Poor Becky, if this was a real life thing and Becky lived in my road she'd be in our guest room right now and Horrible Tracey would be back behind bars. Becky hasn't got a nasty bone in her body, I wish I could be like her, a lovely person and I'm so sad that she's going out of the show. I hope that the door's open so that she can come back and poke her tongue out to all those who doubted her. Shame on you, Steve, you were married to her and you should know her better than anyone. Ridiculous? Indeed it is!! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In the wine cellar *hic*
Posts: 17,562
|
Rightly or wrongly even losing a 7 month term baby is called a miscarriage - even though you have literally had to go through labour and 'give birth'. It's just a technical term I suppose but not exactly the same as losing in the first few weeks. Quote:
Nearly 5 months, she would have needed to be induced surely? Thats a bit rediculous.
EDIT: Just thought, did you mean induced as to hurry the labour on? Quite possible if she wasn't losing them quickly. I may have misinterpreted the meaning of your post! Quote:
I have a real problem with this story line. Its about time the writers did proper research and stopped treating the audience like idiots. 5 months pregnant and miscarrieage I still believe she would have had to have a D & C either as an inpatient or outpatient. Lets say even if she was only in hospital for a couple of hours, there is no way she would be up and about for a few days.
And women have actually given birth and been up and about in no time (out of hospital within a couple hours of birth) BUT they do advise resting for a bit and avoiding lifting heavy things etc because of the risk of haemorrhaging. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nr Glasgow
Posts: 12,757
|
Quote:
Rightly or wrongly even losing a 7 month term baby is called a miscarriage - even though you have literally had to go through labour and 'give birth'. It's just a technical term I suppose but not exactly the same as losing in the first few weeks.
No, 'induced' means they've had to artificially start a the labour off, in this case the labour started by itself i.e. cervix opened and she lost the babies. She would only need a D & C if everything hadn't come away (if you know what I mean without getting graphic) if the foetuses were complete and had passed the placentas and all seemed well then she wouldn't need a D & C. And women have actually given birth and been up and about in no time (out of hospital within a couple hours of birth) BUT they do advise resting for a bit and avoiding lifting heavy things etc because of the risk of haemorrhaging. Also I was told anything up to 6 months is classed as a MC as a baby born inside 6 month would not have a high chance of surviving outside the womb, anything after 6 months is classed as a still birth. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In the wine cellar *hic*
Posts: 17,562
|
Quote:
Do you think its realistic that she went to the toilet and passed 2 5 month fetus, the placenta's and all in one visit to the loo? Even at that far on the cervix would take time to open for this to even happen.
Also I was told anything up to 6 months is classed as a MC as a baby born inside 6 month would not have a high chance of surviving outside the womb, anything after 6 months is classed as a still birth. It all would have been dealt with in hospital.Well when I lost a 7 month it was called a miscarriage. Quite a while ago now though so maybe the terminology has changed, I'll have to ask my niece who is a nurse on a gynaecology ward. And by the way I put an edit on my original post. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 15,378
|
She was in hospital overnight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nr Glasgow
Posts: 12,757
|
Quote:
I thought Tracy got taken away in an ambulance after suffering severe pains in the hotel (and possibly blood too but they didn't show us that icky bit). So where would a toilet come into it
It all would have been dealt with in hospital.Well when I lost a 7 month it was called a miscarriage. Quite a while ago now though so maybe the terminology has changed, I'll have to ask my niece who is a nurse on a gynaecology ward. And by the way I put an edit on my original post. ETA: The toilet bit came from the OP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,434
|
Quote:
Rightly or wrongly even losing a 7 month term baby is called a miscarriage - even though you have literally had to go through labour and 'give birth'. It's just a technical term I suppose but not exactly the same as losing in the first few weeks.
No, 'induced' means they've had to artificially start a the labour off, in this case the labour started by itself i.e. cervix opened and she lost the babies. EDIT: Just thought, did you mean induced as to hurry the labour on? Quite possible if she wasn't losing them quickly. I may have misinterpreted the meaning of your post! She would only need a D & C if everything hadn't come away (if you know what I mean without getting graphic) if the foetuses were complete and had passed the placentas and all seemed well then she wouldn't need a D & C. And women have actually given birth and been up and about in no time (out of hospital within a couple hours of birth) BUT they do advise resting for a bit and avoiding lifting heavy things etc because of the risk of haemorrhaging. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 6,319
|
Quote:
I have a real problem with this story line. Its about time the writers did proper research and stopped treating the audience like idiots. 5 months pregnant and miscarrieage I still believe she would have had to have a D & C either as an inpatient or outpatient. Lets say even if she was only in hospital for a couple of hours, there is no way she would be up and about for a few days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
She was in hospital overnight.
Ken was away or he would of known Tracey was at the hospital and would of asked why ? They didn't phone Steve to look after Amy then he would of known what was going on! If she had got anybody else that late at night they would have asked how Tracey was . |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nr Glasgow
Posts: 12,757
|
Quote:
Then who was looking after Amy,
Ken was away or he would of known Tracey was at the hospital and would of asked why ? They didn't phone Steve to look after Amy then he would of known what was going on! If she had got anybody else that late at night they would have asked how Tracey was . Welcome to DS btw! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 15,378
|
Quote:
Then who was looking after Amy,
Ken was away or he would of known Tracey was at the hospital and would of asked why ? They didn't phone Steve to look after Amy then he would of known what was going on! If she had got anybody else that late at night they would have asked how Tracey was . ![]() Someone must have been looking after her whilst Tracy was ranting and raving and causing havoc in the hotel. Deirdre maybe? Welcome ![]() Joy |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,303
|
I was shocked that she was meant to be 22 weeks pregnant, she was hardly showing, she should have had a massive bump for twins.
Also they would have been able to tell her the sex of the babies, at that stage in pregnancy you have to deliver the baby or babies and arrange a funeral but like chloeb says this is soapland.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40,798
|
Quote:
Who said she flushed them away?
She was taken by ambulance from the HOTEL by ambulance to hospital- we don't know what happened there... If you think she lost them after her fall...you haven't been watching carefully enough... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 7,613
|
Quote:
Was Amy already with Steve
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,101
|
Quote:
The police only have to contact the hospital to find out that Becky couldn't have pushed her down the stairs to cause the miscarriage.
But, that would be too easy. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
It doesn't make sense.
I am sorry but wasn't she nearly five months pregnant? When you lose babies at this stage you don't just flush em down the loo. She'd have to give birth to these babies. And i was only 11 weeks preg. Tracey's miscarriage was the most unrealistic yet!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,434
|
Quote:
I suffered a miscarriage and was in hosp for 4 days, lost 2 pints blood and was given blood transfusion and fluid drips,was weak as water and anaemic for months after.
And i was only 11 weeks preg. Tracey's miscarriage was the most unrealistic yet!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:17.



It all would have been dealt with in hospital.