Originally Posted by killingtime:
“Do you believe John or Luke were/are ONLY with Josie because of money/fame? I would guess not and neither do I. Do you think they were/are happy/ok to get fame/money/noticed from being in a relationship with Josie? well John did numerous photo shoots/interviews and according to Josie pushed for their reality show, was apparently upset when his name was ommitted from the title went back to OZ to watch the wheels go around partly because he was disenchanted with the media world/celebrity lifestyle but then used that avenue to sell a futher two stories to the press about his new girl friend when it suited his purposes to do so and Luke since being with Josie has signed up to twitter, posting pictures/comments, been involved in a couple of magazine shoots and doesn't seem to have a problem with it either. They BOTH at any time had/have the option to say NO.
When you put a relationship into the public arena people are going to have an opinion on it and comment. It's the way it works and it's the trade off you make. Those comments and opinions won't always be favourable and what Qwerty does for the most part is take those opinions/comments/remarks being made and holds a mirror up to the people making them and also the people they're directed at. Often times what happens though is that people choose to ignore or don't see their own reflection in that mirror they simply look at the reflection of others and so are either alternatley amused or offended by them.
The reactions of ALL people who follow or read Qwerty's tweets are interesting and whether or not they're seen as good or bad usually depends on whether or not they agree or share some if not all of the views he/she reflects back to them. Even if you don't agree or think he/she is bonkers you can still usually see why they may hold a certain view of events and just agree to disagree.
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit and if you're reason for using it is to harm, hurt, bring down, belittle or make yourself feel superior to another person then the intent behind it is bad. If the reason you're using it is to spotlight what you believe are peoples own hypocrisies or lies to themselves and maybe others because you're trying to make them in some way see/be the best version of themselves that they can be or at least make them ask questions of themselves the intent behind it is good. That's why I said I HOPE Qwerty's reason for the the things he/she says is the later and not the former. If someone's motives are the former they're being malicious but if someone's motives are the later they're not.”
I totally agree with everything you say here. I am sure it is the former, and is what I was trying to say yesterday, but you have worded it so much better than I could.