Originally Posted by
ftv:
“I know the old saying about lies, damn lies and statistics but there is surely something wrong with a system where so many interpretations can be placed on one set of figures.BARB was set up with the intention of getting a set of ratings the industry accepted and agreed on (as opposed to the BBC and ITV producing rival ratings for years). Now we seem to have a set of ratings on which no-one can agree
”
Am not sure I agree with that? Broadcasters can agree, the DigitalSpy forum can't. With changing delivery mechanisms, there will always, undoubtedly be a fragmentation in audiences, even to the same content, as that fragmentation continues, its folly to suggest people will not want that broken out and reported separately, especially when different commericals are delivered on different platforms for the same content. Carriage fees and cost per thousand impacts can only be assessed by reporting to the greatest granular level possible, therefore this is only to continue, and whatever mechanism you want, or desire, there will be ways in which to add this, that and the other.....thats why organisations like BARB, UKOM, Rajar etc, exist, one to measure and too to set an agreed standard for reconcilliation in trading. If BARB were only to report a singular figure for say ITV1, the trading world would be up in arms.