Originally Posted by grahamzxy:
“Channel 5 television is a bunch of channels, similarly to C4 which has E4 (and successfully chases the 16-34 ad ££ revenue) - there is no reason 5* cannot be a golden egg for C5, it would take some doing to be successful, I think they need to look at the schedule they put out and ensure the channel leans more towards younger viewers with regard to movies/drama/reality. Regarding the live feed, the success depends on the channel opposition, also the fact that it followed a live eviction show at 10:00pm - people did not turn to 5* through apparent boredom - they wanted to watch more of the show. The other channels last night at 10:00pm were showing News, The Crusades, News, a cyber-stalking drama and the KT documentary - hardly something that typical BB viewers would want to watch.”
“Channel 5 television is a bunch of channels, similarly to C4 which has E4 (and successfully chases the 16-34 ad ££ revenue) - there is no reason 5* cannot be a golden egg for C5, it would take some doing to be successful, I think they need to look at the schedule they put out and ensure the channel leans more towards younger viewers with regard to movies/drama/reality. Regarding the live feed, the success depends on the channel opposition, also the fact that it followed a live eviction show at 10:00pm - people did not turn to 5* through apparent boredom - they wanted to watch more of the show. The other channels last night at 10:00pm were showing News, The Crusades, News, a cyber-stalking drama and the KT documentary - hardly something that typical BB viewers would want to watch.”
Channel 4 already had an established audience when they launched and promoted E4 I don't believe the same can be said for Five. Indeed a large part of their reasoning for purchasing Big Brother was to drive viewers, particularly younger viewers, to the channel and to then tempt them to stay for the rest of their content. What is now being suggested is that Five should ditch this strategy in favour of pushing these Big Brother fans to a 5* live feed that can only run whilst Big Brother does and doesn't particularly do much to establish a consistent audience for either channel. As an additional point how often did Channel 4 promote a live Big Brother stream on E4 during prime time? Wasn't it almost exclusively confined to early morning, late night and daytime slots when Channel 4 was unlikely to be showing much that would interest younger viewers? You're absolutely right that 5* could be a golden egg for Five but a Big Brother live feed won't get them there and frankly it makes much more sense to focus on Five given that's where the (relatively) large sums of money are being invested.
Originally Posted by myscrapbook2011:
“They cease to be BB related when they leave the house. After that, they are free to do what they want. Channel 5 just know how to cash in on a profitable show.”
“They cease to be BB related when they leave the house. After that, they are free to do what they want. Channel 5 just know how to cash in on a profitable show.”
There's very little to suggest that Five do know how to cash-in on a profitable show (that's an odd choice of words though, profitable) but OK.
Quote:
“What exactly do they need to do? Pay writers for scripts, pay cameramen for multiple takes?
All they need to do is swap between cameras and mute anything libel. That's not hard nor is it expensive to do. The paid live feed on Channel 4's website failed because people didn't want to subscribe to something online that should be on TV for free.”
“What exactly do they need to do? Pay writers for scripts, pay cameramen for multiple takes?
All they need to do is swap between cameras and mute anything libel. That's not hard nor is it expensive to do. The paid live feed on Channel 4's website failed because people didn't want to subscribe to something online that should be on TV for free.”
You'd be surprised by both how difficult and expensive that can be.
Quote:
“It's not really struggling to pull in 2 million. IT IS pulling in 2 million, and plus 1 viewers, and on demand viewers, and those that record and watch the next day, and those that watch the repeat the next day on Channel 5, Channel 5 +1, 5* and 5* +1. Then there's also the fact that Big Brother is available to watch for more than 7 days online.....
And to say a show is running out of steam just hours after it pulls in record ratings to an under the radar channel which puts it on the map is really ludacris! And no I'm not on about the artist!”
“It's not really struggling to pull in 2 million. IT IS pulling in 2 million, and plus 1 viewers, and on demand viewers, and those that record and watch the next day, and those that watch the repeat the next day on Channel 5, Channel 5 +1, 5* and 5* +1. Then there's also the fact that Big Brother is available to watch for more than 7 days online.....
And to say a show is running out of steam just hours after it pulls in record ratings to an under the radar channel which puts it on the map is really ludacris! And no I'm not on about the artist!”
Yes that viewers are opting to watch a live eviction via various catch-up services cannot be seen as a sign that Big Brother is running out of steam and that audiences are simply less interested in it than they were. That's without even going into historical comparisons. It is painfully obvious that Big Brother is a show on its last legs. It had a phenomenal run and one that was longer than I imagine most suspected was possible but that doesn't change the fact that it is playing to a decreasing level of interest from audiences as a whole.
And once again hysteria about breaking a 5* record is all well and good but also has the same air as celebrating ITV's best Tuesday night performance in a year. They're fairly meaningless states in and of themselves because the bar is set so low to begin with.
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“It doesn't have to be a one off, the face to face nominations do, but they can still set them tasks and do nominations and twists after the show and get about half of that.”
“It doesn't have to be a one off, the face to face nominations do, but they can still set them tasks and do nominations and twists after the show and get about half of that.”
But it'll play to ever diminishing returns (much like Big Brother in general). There's only so many stunts you can pull out of the hat before people stop caring and the Big Brother producers should have learnt that lesson already.




.