DS Forums

 
 

Two seasons per year, yay or nay?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2012, 13:17
Matt&AlionaFan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 961
In answer to the OP, one season is enough. We can have too much of a good thing and people would get bored/fed up with it very quickly!
Matt&AlionaFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 06-01-2012, 18:02
cookiecracker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 313
NAY!!

although i love strictly, two seasons wold be too much. it is the same with everything: the more you have something, the less you appreciate it
cookiecracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 18:15
TrustFundBaby
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 505
Two? Do me a favour it's not that good.....and besides Brucie needs the rest of the year to recover.
TrustFundBaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 18:29
Simone17
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 918
Nay for me too.

A friend and I get childishly excited in the build up because we have missed it so much. That part is just as much fun for us and I think we would lose it if it was on twice a year.
Simone17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 18:32
Richwood
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 577
Nay - Overkill. Dance fans have got DOI and two lots of DWTS to compensate. Like the present length (three months) and number of contestants, but would like to see talented celebs last a decent number of weeks, which isn't always the case.

Maybe there is a case for a one-off midsummer event with, say, six celebs doing two dances each.
The Beeb tried this with African dancing, which didn't work that well, but with other dances it might.
Richwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 22:12
rifleman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 482
no thanks
rifleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 22:22
penelopesimpson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,218
Nay - Overkill. Dance fans have got DOI and two lots of DWTS to compensate. Like the present length (three months) and number of contestants, but would like to see talented celebs last a decent number of weeks, which isn't always the case.

Maybe there is a case for a one-off midsummer event with, say, six celebs doing two dances each.
The Beeb tried this with African dancing, which didn't work that well, but with other dances it might.
Strictly Morris Dancing?
penelopesimpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 23:02
Rose-2010
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,513
I don't see the point in that, yes I want to see talented celebs involved and want them to be there towards the end but part of the entertainment factor for me is watching a complete beginner taken out of their comfort zone. If the criteria was only 'talented celebs' then we woudn't have seen someone like Matt Dawson blossom who was completely hopless to begin with! I also liked Audley Harrison as a contestant - no he was never going to be a great dancer at his size and height but he made up for it in personality and going out there and enjoying himself.

In answer to the OP's question Nay - I think two series would be overkill and rather they concentrate on producing one quality 3 month series a year.
I enjoy seeing the less talented celebs learn to dance also. I loved Gavin and Patsy last year and Audley and Alex this year. I think think that they are quite talented and they are trying hard.
Personally I would have preferred this series if Nancy, Lulu, Edwina and Russell hadn't been on (even if it meant 4 less weeks). I'm sure other people loved them but they didn't entertain me. Although I always wish that there was a week (or more) when there was dancing but not voting out.
Rose-2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:25.