The FIRST spoiler thread week 1 2012

2 of 2

frally

11-01-2012

Originally Posted by salsameg:
“Harry won the final after the first show with well over 50%, (much like Kara in 2010), although Chelsea picked up just over half of Jason's vote in the second show. It was a landslide though and the judges couldn't have changed the result even if they wanted to .”

Many thanks for this salsameg.

Interestingly, all the internet opinion polls which allowed only one vote per IP address showed Harry winning by the same margin.
The single-vote DS Readers Poll was spot on as it accurately predicted Harry winning with 50.8% of the votes:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s104/...y-readers.html

In reality, it looks like multiple phone-voting by obsessive fans in SCD tends to cancel each other out or may not be as high/widespread as we think due to the short voting period and costs involved.

In contrast, it was only the DS forum polls which allowed multiple votes per IP address that gave the reverse result i.e. Chelsee winning with 60%+ votes.
Perhaps this will prompt the Mods to ensure that all future forum polls have the same safeguards against multiple votes as the DS Readers Polls?

perdiedumpling

11-01-2012

Originally Posted by Frockstar:
“I was going to post this in the other thread but was afraid of response of OP. I think the reason is because the judges are really lizards. There is a reptile population as told by David Ike. Harry is a lizard and they wanted one of their own to win. The lizards used their mind powers to get the public to vote for Harry. Thats the real truth.. ”

I wouldn't bother; it would only be twisted into Harry being given high marks to justify his inevitable win. The judges & Harry being lizards is more likly to be accepted than their letting go of their theories.

So, was Arlene a lizard too? Do you know of any high profile lizards as that must surely be a vital part of picking the next judge!

Jim Kowalski

11-01-2012

Originally Posted by frally:
“
In contrast, it was only the DS forum polls which allowed multiple votes per IP address that gave the reverse result i.e. Chelsee winning with 60%+ votes.
?”

Well returning to that poll at intervals to watch the changing totals I always saw a note on the page pointing out that I had already voted,though I never tried to vote again to see if it would,nonetheless,register.

I suspect that the more favourable result here for Chelsee was due to either a greater concentration of Chelsee and/or Pasha fans here than in the wider internet,or a more determined effort from said fans.

It is possible that it was purely the result of multiple voting which appears to be the suggestion of the quoted post,but without evidence that would be little better than defamation.

dancemadgirl

11-01-2012

Originally Posted by perdiedumpling:
“I wouldn't bother; it would only be twisted into Harry being given high marks to justify his inevitable win. !”

Don't you know dance is supposedly ALL about the armography - posture, footwork, timing, hold, rhythm have nothing at all to do with it apparently.

Frockstar

11-01-2012

Originally Posted by perdiedumpling:
“I wouldn't bother; it would only be twisted into Harry being given high marks to justify his inevitable win. The judges & Harry being lizards is more likly to be accepted than their letting go of their theories.

So, was Arlene a lizard too? Do you know of any high profile lizards as that must surely be a vital part of picking the next judge!”

No thats why she left

. Maybe they might get that Jennifer Grey from Dirty Dancing.

leftfeet2

11-01-2012

im on a drive to the end of the motorway

2 of 2