• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Shell's now made £250,000
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
Mesostim
22-10-2004
Originally Posted by Korona:
“Or is she a modern artist in the Tracy Emin mould?

No, now I've thought, you were right jj.”

She did Art History....obviously she couldn;t get on a real art course....
yellowlabbie
22-10-2004
Well done to Shell, she deserves all that money and more for having to live with Michelle for 10 weeks.
Susann
22-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Well done to Shell, she deserves all that money and more for having to live with Michelle for 10 weeks.”


Nine weeks Michelle didn't last the full 10 weeks
yellowlabbie
22-10-2004
Well Susann, I bet myself that someone would come back with that, but I didn't expect it to be you.
Susann
22-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Well Susann, I bet myself that someone would come back with that, but I didn't expect it to be you.”


Sorry YL, just skimming through the forum and couldn't resist replying bet it felt like 10 weeks to poor Shell anyway
turnip
22-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Well done to Shell, she deserves all that money and more for having to live with Michelle for 10 weeks.”

so you approve of nuts and front magazine then ? nice readership ?
yellowlabbie
22-10-2004
If she didn't do it, someone else would have, she's just made some quick money and I don't blame her, at least she didn't tell any lies.
turnip
22-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“If she didn't do it, someone else would have, she's just made some quick money and I don't blame her, at least she didn't tell any lies.”

Michelle didnt do it. She didnt have to. Yet you approve of Shell. Strange.

I dont recall Michelle telling any lies and I recall Shell saying she wouldnt do those kind of pics like Michelle and Emma will do (which they didnt)
thenetworkbabe
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by turnip:
“I find that amount hard to believe. How much can nuts and front afford to pay her ?

the question is how much did the sun and ok give her ? I suppose Jordan wouldnt turn up for an average amount. Why was Jordan necessary ? Its the first time Ive seen a "front cover" in need of a chaperone celeb.

Good luck to Shell. She has an image with the UK public now. I presume all the others were advised by their agents how to project themselves (Shell doesnt have an agent as far as I know). I noticed this weeks issue of OK magazine was sold out at the supermarket with plenty of Front mags still available. Jades a millionaire without selling herself out quite as much. It seems Jade is of more value to these kind of mags. They seem to be interested in what she has to say ??”


its doubtful if 2% of the female population look better than Shell so their willingness to be reminded of this is a limitation. Its doubtful if even 2% of the population don't think of themselves as being smarter and prettier than Jade so of course people find her interesting in a particular negative sort of way.
thenetworkbabe
23-10-2004
Fascinated to know how these figures are made up if indeed they are true. If OK paid that much Alex, Kate and Spencer would have made far more than they were credited with.. Front and nuts might pay thousands but not tens of thousands. It was reported the Sun would pay Shell six figures but I wonder if they did a month later. If they did Shell effectively got as much as anyone but Jade for early press coverage. She still has shown less than all the HM except Vanessa and Becki did in the house.........
janereynolds
23-10-2004
"prettier than Jade"

I always enjoy a good oxymoron.
Popidolveteran
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by Mesostim:
“She did Art History....obviously she couldn;t get on a real art course.... ”


Tee Hee I think I LOVE you mes....no I KNOW!!! I Love you.
thenetworkbabe
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by turnip:
“Michelle didnt do it. She didnt have to. Yet you approve of Shell. Strange.

I dont recall Michelle telling any lies and I recall Shell saying she wouldnt do those kind of pics like Michelle and Emma will do (which they didnt)”


Michelle wanted to be a glamour model. Shell is appearing in celeb mags. The difference is akin to that between Rebekah Jordan and Rachel Stevens given that no glamour model makes a living doing page 3 twice a year

The other difference is that Shell gets paid just because people seem to like her or to look at her. Michelle is getting attention because she was the first female HM to shag on BB.
Dave_E
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“Michelle is getting attention because she was the first female HM to shag on BB.”

And for stalking a near-juvenile to the point of submission on live tv....hmmm....nice
Mesostim
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“Michelle wanted to be a glamour model. Shell is appearing in celeb mags. The difference is akin to that between Rebekah Jordan and Rachel Stevens given that no glamour model makes a living doing page 3 twice a year

The other difference is that Shell gets paid just because people seem to like her or to look at her. Michelle is getting attention because she was the first female HM to shag on BB.”

Are Nuts and Front considered a celeb mags are they? They always struck me as down market low grade porn for blokes to shy to go to the top shelf.....Shell is getting attention because she's willing to sell out her morality for a few quid, Michelle is getting attention because she has a story to tell.....
turnip
23-10-2004
we seem to have missed this prestigious photo-call back in august where Shell was endorsing a quality product and met another new friend. Shell and quality go together, unlike nasty vile Michelle

http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryList...2944&ym=200408

http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/m...p?artid=522381

a possible upside in image-salvaging (??), is that is was for students
Last edited by turnip : 23-10-2004 at 09:57
TwinklyAngel
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“Michelle wanted to be a glamour model. Shell is appearing in celeb mags. The difference is akin to that between Rebekah Jordan and Rachel Stevens given that no glamour model makes a living doing page 3 twice a year

The other difference is that Shell gets paid just because people seem to like her or to look at her. Michelle is getting attention because she was the first female HM to shag on BB.”

What cele mags has shell been in? Oh yes ok onces, what was for michelle and she turned down, so it was given to shell, I think it's michelle that has been in cele mags not shell.
batgirl
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by sian1980:
“What cele mags has shell been in? Oh yes ok onces, what was for michelle and she turned down, so it was given to shell, I think it's michelle that has been in cele mags not shell.”

I don't want to sound like a cow, but the way you write is really difficult to understand. I think I know what you mean, but I can't be sure...
TwinklyAngel
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by sian1980:
“What celeb mags has shell been in? Oh yes ok onces, what was ment to be for michelle but michelle turned it down, so it was given to shell, I think it's michelle that has been in celeb mags not shell.”

sorry i was in a hurry to go out,when posted this.
batgirl
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by sian1980:
“sorry i was in a hurry to go out,when posted this.”

Cool
Trashcan
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“The other difference is that Shell gets paid just because people seem to like her or to look at her. Michelle is getting attention because she was the first female HM to shag on BB.”

You're very confused..

People like to look at Shell half naked in kiddie porno mags while people like to look at Michelle in classy togs in a half desent celeb mag.

Also, did you actually see her 'shag'?
yellowlabbie
23-10-2004
Sorry Trashcan, but Michelle is not in any way classy, anyone who has sex on the tele is not classy, and nothing that Shell has done has been as trashy as this.
Trashcan
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Sorry Trashcan, but Michelle is not in any way classy, anyone who has sex on the tele is not classy, and nothing that Shell has done has been as trashy as this.”

Don't apologize for being confused but I saw a photo of princess in some kind of bondage cavorting in a national rag.. I never saw any such thing from Michelle since leaving the tv show..
Mesostim
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Sorry Trashcan, but Michelle is not in any way classy, anyone who has sex on the tele is not classy, and nothing that Shell has done has been as trashy as this.”

Bondage gear with no knickers...in a low grade porn mag...classy...?
TwinklyAngel
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Sorry Trashcan, but Michelle is not in any way classy, anyone who has sex on the tele is not classy, and nothing that Shell has done has been as trashy as this.”

You haven't seen all the mags that shell been in then.Omg that girl is trashy.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map