• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Shell's now made £250,000
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
yellowlabbie
23-10-2004
Originally Posted by Trashcan:
“Don't apologize for being confused but I saw a photo of princess in some kind of bondage cavorting in a national rag.. I never saw any such thing from Michelle since leaving the tv show..”

I am not confused Trashcan, you can say what you like about Shell and it still does not make Michelle classy.
thenetworkbabe
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by Mesostim:
“Are Nuts and Front considered a celeb mags are they? They always struck me as down market low grade porn for blokes to shy to go to the top shelf.....Shell is getting attention because she's willing to sell out her morality for a few quid, Michelle is getting attention because she has a story to tell.....”

Michelle's only story is "I shagged Stu", "I went on holiday with Stu and we shagged", "still shagging away.."


The lads mags seem to fulfill the same role as OK but for males. Lots of cars football and fashion. You wouldn't find much of that on the top shelf - gymnastic exercises yes but wider content no. As they have the same cast as OK - soap stars, S Club, Katy Hil, Bill stars etc you would have to conclude they are celeb mags. There is a reason why OK and its cheaper siblings sends so many of its stars to beaches too - so they turn up in swimmimg costumes looking like girls in lads mags. look this week and the busty cover girl of the celeb week is Charlotte Church.
Mesostim
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“Michelle's only story is "I shagged Stu", "I went on holiday with Stu and we shagged", "still shagging away.."”

And Shell's story is in her interview she said she was "nice" so from then on people did everything they could to associate her with that rather vague word...even when she was being a nasty spoiled waste of space.....

Quote:
“The lads mags seem to fulfill the same role as OK but for males. Lots of cars football and fashion. You wouldn't find much of that on the top shelf - gymnastic exercises yes but wider content no. As they have the same cast as OK - soap stars, S Club, Katy Hil, Bill stars etc you would have to conclude they are celeb mags. There is a reason why OK and its cheaper siblings sends so many of its stars to beaches too - so they turn up in swimmimg costumes looking like girls in lads mags. look this week and the busty cover girl of the celeb week is Charlotte Church.”

They're low grade porn mags...., simply getting celebs to show themsleves naked doesn't make them celeb mags, it's just fulfilling it's readerships baser desires to see someone they recognise from the TV with no clothes on.......Some sets are more tasteful than others...Shell is doing the others in this case.... Since they represent a fraction of the content anyway, and can go months without a Z list celeb adorning their front covers we can safely conclude they are not "celeb" magazines.....
TwopoundGiro
24-10-2004
I think your on to something there....


heh
john-john
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by Trashcan:
“Don't apologize for being confused but I saw a photo of princess in some kind of bondage cavorting in a national rag.. I never saw any such thing from Michelle since leaving the tv show..”

For once I totally agree with you Trashcan.


(Faints)
cheeks
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“For once I totally agree with you Trashcan.


(Faints)”

have a lie down JJ until you're feeling better!
En Ami
24-10-2004
What I find incredibly hard to stomach is that Shell has done the exact thing that she and Vanessa slagged Michelle off for in the house. Shell honest? Surely I can't be the only one who remembers her deriding Michelle in the early stages of BB for always having her baps out for and daring to publicly state that she wanted to be a glamour model. In fact, I believe her exact words were " I wouldn't lower or cheapen myself by doing things like that, I'd rather use my brain". And lo and behold a few months later and who's posing in every lads mag with next to nothing on?

It's amusing to see that Michelle was rounded on and condemned for daring to be who she was in the house, with people predicting all sorts for her (and Stu) once BB ended. The truth is, next to nothing of what was "predicted" has happened; she hasn't posed for the Sun or any other magazine, topless or otherwise, she hasn't dumped Stu for the rich poser people said she would, and funnily enough, Stu hasn't run a mile from her either.

As for Shell, for someone who keeps saying she wants to go back to a normal life, she's doing a good job of using her body to stay in the limelight isn't she? Hardly a week goes by without the public being subjected to her in various stages of undress. I suppose it's a quick way to make money but considering all that was said during the show and shortly afterwards, isn't it ironic that it's Michelle Jubin and NOT Michelle Bass that has decided to go down this route?
cheeks
24-10-2004
I think Shell saw Michelle's behaviour in the house as a good chance for herself to keep a lower profile and let Michelle take any flak that was coming.Shell was obviously thinking long term as soon as she entered the house.I think everyone goes in with a plan but sometimes events occur that scupper them
Mesostim
24-10-2004
Shell and Nadia have a lot in common it now seems....both have sold their bodies to satisfy seedy mens sexual cravings.....
rachelb65
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by En Ami:
“ I believe her exact words were " I wouldn't lower or cheapen myself by doing things like that, I'd rather use my brain".”

reminds me of the saying .... mens brains are in their d*cks

so shell brains must have been in her t*ts

i totally agree with the rest of your post concerning Michelle and how she has been jumped on and slagged off .... and anyone who says shes a slapper because of under the table ...think back she was called this before the table night
yellowlabbie
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by rachelb65:
“reminds me of the saying .... mens brains are in their d*cks

so shell brains must have been in her t*ts

i totally agree with the rest of your post concerning Michelle and how she has been jumped on and slagged off .... and anyone who says shes a slapper because of under the table ...think back she was called this before the table night”

I have never called Michelle a slapper, that is too polite a word for her.
anna123
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by En Ami:
“What I find incredibly hard to stomach is that Shell has done the exact thing that she and Vanessa slagged Michelle off for in the house. Shell honest? Surely I can't be the only one who remembers her deriding Michelle in the early stages of BB for always having her baps out for and daring to publicly state that she wanted to be a glamour model. In fact, I believe her exact words were " I wouldn't lower or cheapen myself by doing things like that, I'd rather use my brain". And lo and behold a few months later and who's posing in every lads mag with next to nothing on?

It's amusing to see that Michelle was rounded on and condemned for daring to be who she was in the house, with people predicting all sorts for her (and Stu) once BB ended. The truth is, next to nothing of what was "predicted" has happened; she hasn't posed for the Sun or any other magazine, topless or otherwise, she hasn't dumped Stu for the rich poser people said she would, and funnily enough, Stu hasn't run a mile from her either.

As for Shell, for someone who keeps saying she wants to go back to a normal life, she's doing a good job of using her body to stay in the limelight isn't she? Hardly a week goes by without the public being subjected to her in various stages of undress. I suppose it's a quick way to make money but considering all that was said during the show and shortly afterwards, isn't it ironic that it's Michelle Jubin and NOT Michelle Bass that has decided to go down this route?”

well said!!
Has Shell done a single interview thats involved her keep her clothes on ?
cheeks
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by anna123:
“well said!!
Has Shell done a single interview thats involved her keep her clothes on ? ”

I don't think anyone's interested in what Shell has to say to be honest
anna123
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by cheeks:
“I don't think anyone's interested in what Shell has to say to be honest ”

to be honest im suprised people are still interested in her baps!
cheeks
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by anna123:
“to be honest im suprised people are still interested in her baps! ”

they have been overexposed.Time to put them away imo :yawn:
batgirl
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by anna123:
“to be honest im suprised people are still interested in her baps! ”

I think lately most of the discussions have been about her muff actually...
anna123
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by cheeks:
“they have been overexposed.Time to put them away imo :yawn:”

i agree
lurcio
26-10-2004
Originally Posted by Mesostim:
“Shell and Nadia have a lot in common it now seems....both have sold their bodies to satisfy seedy mens sexual cravings.....”


Hmmmmm........
With Shell it's "look but don't touch".
Nadia was "touch... but for the sake of your sanity don't look"
cheeks
26-10-2004
great,you've clogged up the thread with your crap.You're having an adverse effect because I like puh-puh-puh more for annoying a **** like you.Oh dear your post has been removed :yawn:
Last edited by cheeks : 26-10-2004 at 21:03
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map