Originally Posted by Yeah_Jackie:
“He was sure footed on the ice, executed his skating well and his artistry was also very good. If he was over marked it wasn't by much. There was clearly much more skating content in his routine on comparison with Jorgie's, as good as she was, she spent half her routine with feet off the ice.”
Or viewed from the other angle his routine had less content - other than him skating around quite speedily in large circles.
Its inherent in the nature of the show that the males will spend more time with their feet on the ice. The only alternative would be no lifts, or the female celebs lifting the male pros.The comparison is between the time the female celebs and pros spend off ice - and even there the female pros may also spend more time off the ice or doing tricks to hide their pros weakness, or less lifts if they are too weak to lift at all.
The judges shouldn't be marking the routine on skating skills over the other skills, and Jason is meant to be marking the dancing finesse - where Jorgie and Jennifer looked better and Chico looked more like Andy A. I think Mathew was overmarked on both counts. It didn't help that Katerina and Louie both undermined their own credibility by saying they were voting on attraction. It made it look like the Harry situation on DOI again - with 10 marks for limited routines and more comments about chests and looks than content.
They also probably got their relative marks out of sync by marking the first show low- as they didn't know where things would go. In the second show, the pattern was set as soon as Jennifer started with higher marks than Heidi, and, once Chico had been marked even higher , there was nowhere to go with Matt, other than to create a clear gap over Chico.