Um...who blew up the Tardis? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 292
|
Um...who blew up the Tardis?
It's occurred to me that we still don't know why the Tardis blew up in series 5 (leading to the cracks in the universe etc). Or was this explained and I missed it? Was it the Silence?
Has this been forgotten - or will Mr Moffat explain this at some point? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Services: Oh Hai Mark!
Posts: 12,065
|
Presumably it was the Silence.
There was also no explanation of how River Song got to the Ponds wedding, given there was no doctor in that universe at that point. I don't suppose there ever will be. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,700
|
No you've missed nothing there... same as who in the Tardis says 'Silence will wall'
Anyone who pretends they have sussed it are guessing ... the Moff is a genius I'm sure of it |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Services: Oh Hai Mark!
Posts: 12,065
|
Of course there's the extra scene on the series 6 dvd where Amy complains her life does not make sense and the Doctor tells her to go buy an ice cream. Maybe that's all you need. Probably all we're getting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,394
|
The Silence blew up the TARDIS, in one of their apparently many attempts to kill the Doctor. We don't know by what method, although it's interesting to note that River was the only one present in the TARDIS at that point, just as she was the agent by which their other assassination attempts took place. Just sayin'. Don't mean nuthin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sutton
Posts: 3,792
|
There is the line after Amy asks what will happen to them after the second big bang. The Doctor says that they will end up where they are supposed to be. River should be with her parents, after all...
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Services: Oh Hai Mark!
Posts: 12,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Services: Sky
Posts: 6,128
|
IMO none of this has been explained yet! The origins of the voice, the exploding Tardis and who was piloting the Tardis will no doubt be explained at some point...I hope!
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lancashire, UK
Services: The Original Resident Jenna-Louise Coleman Fanatic
Posts: 7,127
|
I thought Moffat mentioned that it was The Silence. Oh well. If not, then it probably was, I was hoping this would have been put to rest by now - I don't want the arc to continue as it is, in to Series 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sofas are deities
Services: Coffee with brown milk in the Inn
Posts: 15,930
|
No, it hasn't been explained yet. We can speculate, yes, but there was no definite answer. I honestly don't believe that the silence were responsible for it a) because River was the only one in the Tardis at the time (very inefficient if they wanted to kill the Doctor), and b) we would not have had the whole of series 6 where the Doctor had to be killed at a specific point in time and place. Presumably, the Silence always intended to kill him at the Lake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Services: Virgin Media
Posts: 5,099
|
I think it was a villain. It wouldn't really make sense if it was a hero. Or a good guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,394
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,459
|
s moffat has stated it was the silence - but they've never actually made it clear in the show
this is what i find hard to understand. surely when they're writing something they know they need to explain it at some point (also the voice in the tardis). do they just forget? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West London
Services: Sky+ HD; Sky BB; Echostar DVR7000 + 1.8m H-H Dish w/C-Band
Posts: 4,650
|
Perhaps we'll find out in the 50th anniversary special, but I'm not holding my breath!
I also thought that blowing up the TARDIS when the Doctor wasn't at home was a bit of a cock-up by whomever was responsible. It's possible that it was some sort of time-bomb that was set to go off at a particular moment, and it didn't occur to them that their target might not be there at the time! Where are all the good villains when you need them?! Giving them the benefit of the doubt, perhaps they assumed that just blowing up the TARDIS would destroy the Doctor wherever or whenever he was (along with everything else of course. D'oh!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,980
|
Quote:
Their plan would have worked as well if it wasn't for that pesky Vortex Manipulator that River left lying about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West London
Services: Sky+ HD; Sky BB; Echostar DVR7000 + 1.8m H-H Dish w/C-Band
Posts: 4,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Whoonie Inn
Services: Redshirt
Posts: 2,582
|
The Silence trying to kill the Doctor so he didn't end the universe. Ironically....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sutton
Posts: 3,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N. Yorkshire
Services: TalkTalk
Posts: 5,056
|
To be honest - I don't give a toss! I hope it's all forgotten about like MANY other weird mysteries in the series.
Time to move on !!! Start afresh - otherwise I shall definitely move on and start watching more sensible programmes like Fern Britten watches! Actually - I'm SERIOUS!! The last two series have been very odd, and I have NOT enjoyed them. I feel terrible saying this - but that is my opinion after watching it since 1965 as a five year old kid! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 945
|
I always thought the destruction of the TARDIS was related to River Song crossing her own timeline because the date she was conceived aboard the TARDIS was the date the TARDIS blows up (unless I've remembered it wrong). Of course, at that point in series 5 we didn't know any of that.
No-one else has really mentioned it, so I am probably wrong about it and I'll shut up now. |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,394
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Knaresborough, North Yorks
Services: Virgin Media XL TV with Tivo, XL Phone & 30MB Broadband
Posts: 17,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 779
|
I always thought it was River ( on the Doctor's instructions) who blew it up to re-set time. The voice was just something coming through the crack. I never really saw a great mystery but that could be me not paying close enough attention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,394
|
But it was the TARDIS blowing up that caused all the problems that needed re-setting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,794
|
A wizard did it.
Or maybe the TARDIS realised that in the future/past/whenever River will be/has been/is working for the Silence and so self destructed to make sure she couldn't hurt the Doctor. |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:35.




