Originally Posted by Eater Sundae:
“Not a tourniquet, but equivalent to applying pressure to the wound - which is what Sherlock was asked to do in the case of the guardsman, so in effect he was replacing the belt.
If the belt was tight enough, I could believe (as a layman) that the pressure could hide the pain. I just doubt that it would ever be that tight.
Also, if there was a lot of pressure, blood would be driven from the area. Once the pressure was released, it would take a few seconds for blood to return to the area. Also, most of the bleeding would be internal, with only a small hole to the outside, and so there may not be a great deal of blood, and certainly not immediately.”
“Not a tourniquet, but equivalent to applying pressure to the wound - which is what Sherlock was asked to do in the case of the guardsman, so in effect he was replacing the belt.
If the belt was tight enough, I could believe (as a layman) that the pressure could hide the pain. I just doubt that it would ever be that tight.
Also, if there was a lot of pressure, blood would be driven from the area. Once the pressure was released, it would take a few seconds for blood to return to the area. Also, most of the bleeding would be internal, with only a small hole to the outside, and so there may not be a great deal of blood, and certainly not immediately.”
But no it isn't the same. Applying localized pressure directly onto the wound would be very different to a belt which would apply even pressure around the waist with an uncovered wound, squeezing the victim like squeezing water out of a sponge.





”
hem ... The implement used on the reconstruction looked more like a stiletto and I suppose the aim was slow and steady in the right place to avoid being felt rather than a quick jab to give maximum pain and effect.