Originally Posted by OnaOakey:
“I love this theory!
Although in that case, I reckon that they were a set of triplets.My class was taken by a supply teacher the other day who looked and sounded identical to Moriarty.
And his name was James
”
“I love this theory!
Although in that case, I reckon that they were a set of triplets.My class was taken by a supply teacher the other day who looked and sounded identical to Moriarty.
And his name was James
”
Oooh, something to look forward to in school.
Originally Posted by Nollaig79:
“Good observation Ellaboo, I must check out the scene again. Your thoughts also ties in a little with Chocolate Monke's dad's theory about there being more than one Moriarty i.e. a group of angels etc. I agree with OnaOakley that its a great theory indeed. Especially when I want to see more of Moriarty or his followers in the next series
”
“Good observation Ellaboo, I must check out the scene again. Your thoughts also ties in a little with Chocolate Monke's dad's theory about there being more than one Moriarty i.e. a group of angels etc. I agree with OnaOakley that its a great theory indeed. Especially when I want to see more of Moriarty or his followers in the next series
”
It's my dad's theory, but I'm taking credit for the details
. Can't let the old man have all the fun and kudos! 
He picked up on Sherlock's speechlessness at the journalist's flat and came up with that. I don't know if I see it myself. What is it that Sherlock could see to make him realise it's a different Moriarty? After all, Moriarty is acting in role as Rich Brook, so his mannerisms are supposed to be different. So maybe it's something which we need Sherlock-vision for!
But I like the theory. It explains a bit more about the episode, such as why Sherlock made the phonecall to John. After all, to save his friends, he didn't have to make the phonecall, he just had to kill himself, especially now that Moriarty was dead. So why make the phonecall? Because he doesn't want Watson looking into his death too closely? Or he wants the real Moriarty to believe he's dead via Watson's reactions. Watson has to make it believable for Moriarty, not just his henchmen.
It would perhaps also explain Moriarty's 'You are me' on the roof. He has major ID problems.

Of course, this being Moffat, we're probably way off!
Originally Posted by nethwen:
“Re: the two Moriarty's. I've thought about that a bit, too, as there are in fact two 'James Moriarty's' in the Conan Doyle canon, both brothers. I read somewhere that Steven Moffat said they are thinking of using it somewhere down the line in further episodes.
If, as Moffat has said recently, that he hopes Sherlock episodes will be around "for decades", then it doesn't make sense to kill off Sherlock's nemesis so early in the Series imho.
”
“Re: the two Moriarty's. I've thought about that a bit, too, as there are in fact two 'James Moriarty's' in the Conan Doyle canon, both brothers. I read somewhere that Steven Moffat said they are thinking of using it somewhere down the line in further episodes.
If, as Moffat has said recently, that he hopes Sherlock episodes will be around "for decades", then it doesn't make sense to kill off Sherlock's nemesis so early in the Series imho.
”
I'd be quite happy for Moriarty to be dead and not make a return, to be honest. Not because I didn't think he was a great character, but because a villain often loses something with repeat appearances (Daleks, the Borg, Spike, etc) and it would be a shame to do this with Moriarty.
But I have faith in Moffat and Gatiss to make it work, whatever it is they choose to do...




