• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Good Nightie, Shell. Sunday Mirror Feature.
EddyBee
24-10-2004
'SHELL Jubin made her name stripping naked in the Big Brother house but here she is all dressed-up...for the bedroom.

The blonde babe's raunchy oufits will guarantee a frilling start to setting up home in her £150,000 flat in Glasgow with sweetheart Scott Hutcheson...'

Full story and pics here, Sunday Mirror, 24/10/04.
rachelb65
24-10-2004
blimey ... hasn't she gone yet
cheeks
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by rachelb65:
“blimey ... hasn't she gone yet”

not until the cash offers run out!
Sadperson
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by EddyBee:
“'SHELL Jubin made her name stripping naked in the Big Brother house but here she is all dressed-up...for the bedroom.
”

Can we look forward to more & more pics of Shell wearing more & more clothes??? Oh the excitement and anticipation of seeing what she looks like with her clothes on...
yellowlabbie
24-10-2004
Well done Shell, keep the money coming in.
turnip
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Well done Shell, keep the money coming in.”

yeah nice maids outfit Shell. She is nothing like Michelle and Emma (and even Vanessa). She is way above those tramps

And now Shell fans can add Larry Flynt Publications to their list of magazines they support too
En Ami
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Well done Shell, keep the money coming in.”


Interesting that you call Michelle a slapper for being sexual with her boyfriend on tv for millions to see (or not see as the facts really stand), and yet Shell gets a "well done" because she essentially strips for money in national dailies and magazines for millions to very definitely see.

So how does that work exactly?
yellowlabbie
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by En Ami:
“Interesting that you call Michelle a slapper for being sexual with her boyfriend on tv for millions to see (or not see as the facts really stand), and yet Shell gets a "well done" because she essentially strips for money in national dailies and magazines for millions to very definitely see.

So how does that work exactly?”

When did I call Michelle a slapper? There is nothing wrong with taking off your clothes, it's our natural state.
yellowlabbie
24-10-2004
And Stuart was not always Michelle's boyfriend when she started to give him 'sexual favours'.
En Ami
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“When did I call Michelle a slapper? There is nothing wrong with taking off your clothes, it's our natural state.”



In another thread you stated that "slapper" was too polite a name for Michelle. So alright, you didn't call her one but your insinuation was pretty clear.

I guess I'm just wondering if you would be so magmanimous towards Michelle if she was the one posing in various stages of undress weekly rather Shell. Or is that a redundant question?
En Ami
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“And Stuart was not always Michelle's boyfriend when she started to give him 'sexual favours'.”


Sexual favours? How quaint.

And does it really matter at the end of the day? He is her boyfriend now and the fact remains that she didn't give "sexual favours" to anyone other than him. So where's the problem?
yellowlabbie
24-10-2004
I couldn't care less if Michelle takes her clothes off, I just did not like her behaviour on BB, the way she went about getting a man, can't she get one without using sex, then no of course she can't because she doesn't have a good personality. Shell has her man, she just wants to earn a bit of money. There's a lot of people on this forum who think it is OK for Michelle to have sex on the TV and for Nadia to sell her body for bigger boobs, but not Ok for Shell to pose nude in the mags etc. Hypocrites.
En Ami
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“I couldn't care less if Michelle takes her clothes off, I just did not like her behaviour on BB, the way she went about getting a man, can't she get one without using sex, then no of course she can't because she doesn't have a good personality. Shell has her man, she just wants to earn a bit of money. There's a lot of people on this forum who think it is OK for Michelle to have sex on the TV and for Nadia to sell her body for bigger boobs, but not Ok for Shell to pose nude in the mags etc. Hypocrites.”


I think you are missing my point. The biggest hypocrite around is Shell herself. I don't particularly have a problem with her posing for whatever mag she chooses to, clothed or unclothed. What I do find supremely irritating however is the fact that she derided someone else for wanting to do exactly what she herself has now done. Both she and Vanessa were bitchy about Michelle's glamour modelling ambitions and yet, they've both done exactly what they said they'd never "lower themselves" and do. That is what I have a problem with, such shameless double standards.

As for Michelle using sex to get a man, I can't see that she's any different from most girls her age these days. She saw a guy, fancied the pants off him and had no qualms about being upfront about it. And quite frankly, who doesn't use sex to attract someone they're interested in romantically?
anna123
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“I couldn't care less if Michelle takes her clothes off, I just did not like her behaviour on BB, the way she went about getting a man, can't she get one without using sex, then no of course she can't because she doesn't have a good personality. Shell has her man, she just wants to earn a bit of money. There's a lot of people on this forum who think it is OK for Michelle to have sex on the TV and for Nadia to sell her body for bigger boobs, but not Ok for Shell to pose nude in the mags etc. Hypocrites.”

at least michelle had a personality unlike sHELL!!
And dont start all that rubbish about hoe shell isnt a hypocrite because she is !! she completely condoned michelle for wanting to be a glamour model and then she goes and does it herself ! #that is why she is a hypocrite, i dont think nadia or mich have done any thing that makes them hypocrites?
TwinklyAngel
24-10-2004
Originally Posted by anna123:
“at least michelle had a personality unlike sHELL!!
And dont start all that rubbish about hoe shell isnt a hypocrite because she is !! she completely condoned michelle for wanting to be a glamour model and then she goes and does it herself ! #that is why she is a hypocrite, i dont think nadia or mich have done any thing that makes them hypocrites? ”

well said anna.
janereynolds
24-10-2004
You don't think it's just a little hypocrytical of Jorge to be calling Vanessa a whore, when he himself earned his living as a male prostitute?
thenetworkbabe
25-10-2004
A big point missed here. Shell is in the sunday Mirror. She has been in the Star, the Sunday Times, The Sun and now the Mirror. This is a BB first. The tabloids usually ignore people who have appeared in other tabloids and often slag them off. Kate Lawler seems to have been the subject of a vendetta by the Mirror after she became a recurring feature in the Sun, Star and express. Shell is the first all tabloid friendly BB HM.
thms
25-10-2004
talk of nighties and yet more blanket coverage of shell is making me :yawn:
thenetworkbabe
25-10-2004
Originally Posted by anna123:
“at least michelle had a personality unlike sHELL!!
And dont start all that rubbish about hoe shell isnt a hypocrite because she is !! she completely condoned michelle for wanting to be a glamour model and then she goes and does it herself ! #that is why she is a hypocrite, i dont think nadia or mich have done any thing that makes them hypocrites? ”

The point is devastatingly easy to understand but seems not to be understood.

Glamour models perform gymnastics moves with no clothes on in top shelf magazines. They start on page 3 and graduate up trhe shelves and onto the strange channels on Sky that lie beyond the newspages. They then vanish into the adverts in papers like The Sport (or, in Woking, the local paper alongside nadia's ad)

As far as I am aware celebs appearing in the Sunday mirror don't do that sort of thing.
Seal Terminator
25-10-2004
Originally Posted by En Ami:
“In another thread you stated that "slapper" was too polite a name for Michelle. So alright, you didn't call her one but your insinuation was pretty clear.

I guess I'm just wondering if you would be so magmanimous towards Michelle if she was the one posing in various stages of undress weekly rather Shell. Or is that a redundant question? ”

Hmm, This is where you also remember her "pervert" attack on Ahmed, and her "c@@t" attack on victor. I should say that she is very calculating and maliputive myself. Maybe all she needs is a night out with some wild boys
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map