Originally Posted by dave01:
“Poor start for Skins...”
I wonder if the problem with Skins is that its just failed to find a new audience. Its been six years since the first series aired and the teens that watched that will now be either approaching their 20's or already there – how much interest do they have in a teen drama about 16 year olds? Skins is a great idea if you assume that every two years it refreshes its audience but if its just the same viewers who were there in series one the whole thing falls apart...
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“Can't recall Strictly doing anything like that. There has been a lot of crap written here about Dancing on Ice over the last few days (I don't really understand why BBC fanboys are so threatened by it!). Yes, it gets quite a bit wrong (the ads, Christine Bleakley, the line up isn't great!) but as a competition and a format it is in no way as inferior to Strictly as some people here like to make out.”
Its the exact same format just on ice and as I said yesterday I think its the addition of the ice that tends to undermine the whole thing because it just makes it far too difficult and far too technical. Despite being on air for several years now I've yet to see anyone excel in Dancing on Ice in the same way contestants do year in and year out on Strictly and as a result you have a much lower standard of competition and a much less visually engaging show for viewers. The basic concept is absolutely fine it just stumbles in reality.
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“agreed, cant see EE beating that this year,”
Depends on what they have lined up for Christmas and how the Christmas schedules shake out this year. I don't think its such an incredibly high number that its impossible though.