Originally Posted by tdenson:
“Classic schoolboy error, comparing CPUs. 1.2 vs 0.8 is a meaningless statistic. You have to take into account that IOS and the CPU are co-engineered by the same company to be finely tuned and optimised in a way that Android can never be (except with future Motorola/Google phones possibly - but Google are not dedicated to the task of the best end user hardware experience).”
I would agree with you in theory, in practice this is not the case. You have to remember each manufacturer puts their own 'skin' on top of android. This skin will be optimised for the phone they are putting it on. This would be true for flagship phones and phones that have a new version of Android like the Nexus. So in real life, there 0.4MHz is a genuine difference. I doubt iOS can make up the gap. Its also worth noting, that the Nexus is faster in benchmark tests.
Originally Posted by tdenson:
“That's ironic. Two years ago it was the Apple fanboys (me included) saying that in relation to the 3GS against Android phones.”
The statement is true, however in not all cases. Each phones camera needs to be examined on an individual bases. I fail to see the irony in the statement.
Originally Posted by tdenson:
“Your main point I believe was that without Steve Jobs Apple is dead.
Well to answer this question and the OP at the same time, the reason why iDevices are actually good value for money despite the high profit margin is that Apple have done an excellent job at securing parts in advance at very low cost. This means that they can produce something which has a retail price no more than competitive products containing similar components and yet still take a high profit. If you don't believe this then tell me why no other manufacturers have yet come out with a similar spec to the iPad at a greatly reduced price. Personally, I don't begrudge Apple their profit margin when I buy their products, it ensures great products in the future.
The reason why Steve Jobs is not relevant to this is that there is one person above all others who has been responsible for driving this profit margin and that is Tim Cooke, who is on board until I believe 2021 if he wants to cash in his shares.”
Tim Cooke may drive the profit margin. However he has to have products that will sell. Saying Jobs is not relevant, shows a lack of how business works. No matter how good Cooke is at achieving high profit margins, he cant do anything if he doesnt have products to sell. Jobs was the lead man behind products. No Jobs means products that arent as good. The change in products wont be noticed for a couple of years yet. As I bet they have a few products in the 'assembly' line that Jobs had input to. It will happen though.