Originally Posted by Last Request:
“The hardcore Eastenders fans should release a book of excuses would be a best seller.
We should wait and see first if Eastenders gets 8 million on Monday. If it doesn't we can then say it was complete waste of time and money.”
Not a complete waste as it does give you something to complain about regularly.
For me, even though Coronation Street and Eastenders are both soaps they are in fact completely different programs and appeal to different markets.
Eastenders is a gritty, kitchen sink drama and it's why the Lucy plot is such a good one in my opinion and makes Easties top of it's game. It's got a good old fashioned murder mystery and is also focusing hugely on the aftermath and how it affects it's other viewers.
Coronation Street is a more cosy soap, it's about Northern humour and a community spirit. In recent years it's tried to compete with the sort of storylines other soaps do, but it shouldn't. It is the one soap that should avoid sensationalism at all costs, it's not what the show is about.
For me, the shows that match Eastenders were The Bill, Bad Girls and to a lesser extent Casualty as they have the same style of grittiness.
Holby City and Waterloo Road are the most similar to Coronation Street, as is Emmerdale.
I think it's easy to want to compare Corrie and Easties as they are both soaps, but the way they do storytelling, the way they portray characters is completely different. And there are no winners to these arguments. And I find it laughable that people call for the axe of Eastenders just because it's got less viewers than corrie. Well it's not the only show to have less ratings that corrie. Easties needs to be viewed on it's own merits and not how it compares to another soap.