|
||||||||
Is a plasma TV still the sign of extravagance ? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,690
|
Is a plasma TV still the sign of extravagance ?
Whenever you would see one of those benefit related stories in the paper, if the family had a plasma TV on the wall they would be blasted for it. I just wondered if that is still the same these days given CRTs are rarely sold and 42" TVs can be bought for as little as £300, same price as 28" CRTs were 10 years ago.
Also how many people still have a CRT in the main room of their house ? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,583
|
I think I'm right in saying Plasmas are the cheapest new TV you can get these days, so to the original question; no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,196
|
It goes 3DLED >>> LED >>> LCD >>> PLASMA >>> CRT
Although I would say CRT still has the best picture quality, but that's a discussion for another thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,441
|
Only if it's hung on the wall above the fireplace or at standing height. Then you know it's just someone selling the ideal home myth that doesn't really bother with tv. There will be a dining table with a narrow cloth down the middle of it nearby as well.
Normal people have them at the same height as an old tube. Even if they're on the wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,595
|
I always find it strange when people (police in particular) describe plasmas as a luxury item, making it sound like it costs tens of thousands.
In reality everyone I know his either a plasma or LCD. Students to oaps, well off to people who have never worked. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Here on the net
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
Whenever you would see one of those benefit related stories in the paper, if the family had a plasma TV on the wall they would be blasted for it. I just wondered if that is still the same these days given CRTs are rarely sold and 42" TVs can be bought for as little as £300, same price as 28" CRTs were 10 years ago.
Also how many people still have a CRT in the main room of their house ? I have a 32 Panasonic Quintrix CRT I feel all poor and 20th centuary now ![]() Mind you my pc monitors a decent 24" LED
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12,979
|
Quote:
Only if it's hung on the wall above the fireplace or at standing height. Then you know it's just someone selling the ideal home myth that doesn't really bother with tv. There will be a dining table with a narrow cloth down the middle of it nearby as well.
Normal people have them at the same height as an old tube. Even if they're on the wall. Anyway I had a plasma for 6 years until it "went" recently and until I can afford the latest one I am using the old style one we had in our bedroom and you know what? I forget I am watching it. Still have the surround sound but at the moment I am really not bothered, |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4,044
|
Plasma tv are all over 42 inches.
When watching 42-55 inch TV's the best picture quality will be viewed on a Plasma especially 3D smart tv like a Panasonic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
It goes 3DLED >>> LED >>> LCD >>> PLASMA >>> CRT
Although I would say CRT still has the best picture quality, but that's a discussion for another thread. Are you an AV enthusiast? Do you know something I don't? The VT30 and Kuro owners might wish to add their bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,931
|
I have a CRT TV in my room,has lasted me a long time so I see no reason to get rid of it.
My mum has a CRT TV in her room and so does my younger brother. We also have 2 LED TVs. That's a random mix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,127
|
Id say large flatscreen are quite often (but not always) a sign of chavvyness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,196
|
Quote:
What goes?
Are you an AV enthusiast? Do you know something I don't? The VT30 and Kuro owners might wish to add their bit. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 27,529
|
The moaning right-wing press still like to talk about flat screen TVs, blu-ray players and satellite TV as expensive luzuries. though that's mostly to push their vile agenda against people on benefits..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 27,529
|
Quote:
When watching 42-55 inch TV's the best picture quality will be viewed on a Plasma especially 3D smart tv like a Panasonic.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,505
|
Quote:
It goes 3DLED >>> LED >>> LCD >>> PLASMA >>> CRT
Although I would say CRT still has the best picture quality, but that's a discussion for another thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Newbold, Derbyshire
Posts: 3,590
|
What is this "vile agenda"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,796
|
Quote:
I would never describe 3D as "the best picture quality". A nauseating headache more like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wolf359
Posts: 96,797
|
Quote:
I can't do 3D for more than a few minutes, it does my head in!! the wow factor wears away after a bit anyways. Give me a decent flat LCD which does a crisp sharp picture with good colours and that's all I need really.
I've tried both and can't watch active 3d for more than 15mins. To be honest I don't think 3d is an improvement, it is more a gimmick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wolf359
Posts: 96,797
|
Quote:
What is this "vile agenda"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,404
|
Quote:
What goes?
Are you an AV enthusiast? Do you know something I don't? The VT30 and Kuro owners might wish to add their bit. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,233
|
We have a sony bravia its about 5 or 6 years old. He wanted it for the football. other than that we have a cheapo little tv DVD for the bedroom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,367
|
In my case a big TV is not a sign of extravagence but more about how bloody short sighted I am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,737
|
I don't think I know anyone who still has a CRT TV. In fact I do, a friend still has dead one in his spare room as it's too bloody heavy to shift.
The one thing I cannot stand is wall mounted TVs, especially above the fireplace. You must get a crick in your neck watching it. Surely the screen should be at the same level as your eyes when sitting down? |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Folkestone
Posts: 10,537
|
In most high street stores you can't in fact buy a full sized CRT (although there are still some portables).
Even online you would likely find 1 CRT for every 99 Flatscreens. So whilst plenty of people do have CRTs (because many see no reason to replace something that is still working) as their life comes to an end (the TV, not the people) they will likely get a flatscreen because that's all that's available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,707
|
we have a crt in the bedroom, we are going to get a flat sreen at some point but when we got our own place we wanted one in the bedroom and I had my old one from years ago sitting in the spare room so we took that with us. The one in the sitting room is a 42inch as my partner is a gamer and he says can't play xbox on a small tv.
But the crt one takes up so much space |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12.



I feel all poor and 20th centuary now 
