it would be so good if they made a rule that the judges just gave the name of the person they were saving and we did not have to hear all the ****ing BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think the judges like to get out their observations to the celebrity incase they feel hard done by if voting goes against them and they're not sure why - or just pure constructive comments to help them, but keeping it a bit more brief would help us a bit.
Originally Posted by paaul12: “it would be so good if they made a rule that the judges just gave the name of the person they were saving and we did not have to hear all the ****ing BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ffs”
I think there should be the opposite rule. They're an expert judging panel. I'd like to hear their expert opinions, rather than having them being rushed through it.
Originally Posted by trollface: “I think there should be the opposite rule. They're an expert judging panel. I'd like to hear their expert opinions, rather than having them being rushed through it.”
Originally Posted by Sparklyblue171: “I think the judges like to get out their observations to the celebrity incase they feel hard done by if voting goes against them and they're not sure why - or just pure constructive comments to help them, but keeping it a bit more brief would help us a bit.”
Usually they get to comment before when they give scores but they couldn't do that this week so they had to give their comments when they chose which couples to save and which to put up for public vote.
I couldn't disagree more with the OP - the judges are there to give constructive comments on the performances we see, and they did just that. It probably softened the blow for the 'losers' in each duel as well as in some cases, both couples were excellent.
