Originally Posted by miles19740:
“I just disagree with the whole premise of the Cowell shows. It promotes a rapid rise to fame - supported and backed up by very little else - for very little 'real' work in return, in my view. It gives false hope to those taking part and provides a bad model (money for very little/no work) for the many children who watches his shows, which in my opinion, is a negative.
The 'Ollie episode' last night proves that the process is flawed. Years of hard graft and training can never be replaced by instant fame, in my view.
The only winner of the Cowell shows is Cowell himself.”
“I just disagree with the whole premise of the Cowell shows. It promotes a rapid rise to fame - supported and backed up by very little else - for very little 'real' work in return, in my view. It gives false hope to those taking part and provides a bad model (money for very little/no work) for the many children who watches his shows, which in my opinion, is a negative.
The 'Ollie episode' last night proves that the process is flawed. Years of hard graft and training can never be replaced by instant fame, in my view.
The only winner of the Cowell shows is Cowell himself.”
But credit where it is due, some X Factor artists like Leona Lewis and Alexandra Burke did actually do all that hard work. They did gigs etc for years and tried to make it into the industry.




)