Originally Posted by Eric_Blob:
“Maybe. That's kind of what Start Without You did. It got to #1, but sold almost the same amount overall that All Night Long did, even though that only got to #4.
If she's out the same week as Katy Perry, and Labrinth, surely Katy Perry will win, and Labrinth will get 2nd? I don't think Katy will get opening sales as big as California Gurls, but I reckon she could do about 100,000. Alexandra is way behind those two in radio airplay, especially on Capital, one of the most important stations (which usually plays Alexandra a lot, but hasn't played Elephant for some reason).”
They're snubbing her even though fans are asking them to play it constantly. They've done the same to one direction.
Radio 1 have always hated Alex, and now Capital are playing the same game.
In SWY's case, they didnt like it, and so didn't play it. It had about 150k figures for it's first 2 weeks or so, and then and extra 100k in total. It had massive equal jumps down the chart ie 1-1-5-10-15-20. I found the last bit quite amusing to watch on the charts, its rare that happens. In ANL's case, syco (again) deleted the original version off itunes, and so it forced people to only buy the single mix, with the irritating Pitbull.
And they did the same with Broken heels and The silence. And often they did it AFTER the original had considerable downloads. As long as she sells consistently and gets hits out, she'll be fine. Kylie minogue (I know its the physical v digital age but still) has lots of silver certifications and loads of top 10 hits. I'd rather Alex sell 300k per single (and have one big single ie. 500k) per album era than to have 600k followed by 200k singles. She needs to sell well over a long period of time, or enough to cover RCA's costs, which is why her writing songs (as she says she's done) is now essential. It covers her financially. There isn't much the poor girl can do.