|
||||||||
Were Blur that bad at the Brits? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,627
|
Were Blur that bad at the Brits?
I had heard how terrible and awful Blur were at the Brits from various media outlets over the last 24 hours so I checked out the performance (medley of Girls and Boys, Song 2, Parklife) and it wasn't that bad...! Admittedly Parklife was probably the worst bit of it, but GAB and Song 2 arent very vocally songs so why is everyone like all of a sudden Damon's vocals were terrible!! The band sounded good, its just a different type of music! Damon sings the slower blur songs very well live Tender, Universal etc, its just the songs Blur chose to perform at the Brits were their more pop rocky well known ones and I thought they were okay!.
Performance is at the bottom of the article - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...rformance.html What do others think?? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 600
|
Honestly, the first 2 sounded okay but nothing special and the 3rd one Parklife was like 2 blokes who'd had a bit too much to drink getting up on stage and trying to sing. Pretty bad. Overall though, looked like they were abit rusty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,230
|
Like I said in the Brits discussion thread... rock bands thrive off the audience/crowd. It doesn't help when you have a bunch of corporates in front sat at a table drinking and talking amongst each other.
Damon was singing "wahoo" and trying to get the crowd going... didn't work and it's a shame the Brits changed it's format, before 2009 it had a standing allocation, they got rid of it few years ago. This is how it should be done... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6w5zNcVbvs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzDoX3Dbpz8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,404
|
I thought they were pretty terrible. And not just Damon Albarn, the band seemed a bit shaky too. Watching it back again, Girls & Boys wasn't that bad (although it wasn't that good either) but Song 2 and Parklife were a mess. It was a bit like watching drunken karaoke which was a shame because I really like Blur. Or at least I really like Damon Albarn. Not so keen on Alex James.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ignoringtrollsville
Posts: 7,875
|
The crowd they were playing to is absolutely no excuse for a band whose members have been playing their instruments for well over 20 years. They were simply awful and clearly (in fact, scandalously given the occasion) under rehearsed. If they had been stellar most people would have forgiven the Adele business that went on before hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,404
|
Oh and this is how you do a Lifetime Achievement Award performance well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bziX98FSBl0
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A true B Blocker!
Posts: 4,990
|
This was the best bit of their set:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KjqagZja_Q particuarly This is a Low. Tender wasnt really sounding as good as it once was but I still enjoyed it. Liked Song2 but wasnt fussed about the other two, I dont get all this criticism of these songs not being tuneful and too shouty - the songs have always been pretty much like that. I didnt really care about that, i liked the energy and performance on stage - rather than robotic chorographed performances - I wanted to go along and jump about, also liked the nostalgic value of it all. All in all, i was a bit disappointment that they were up to the standard they once were, plus i would have personally gone for 3 different songs for the main show, but I dont think its as bad as everybodies making out - i think the criticism has been heightened after the Adele incident. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,373
|
I'm not sure why they agreed to appear. They seemed out of place and i can't see what was in it for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 1984
Posts: 7,109
|
Phil Daniels was the best Blur singer - nuff said
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Looking for a new manager
Posts: 16,549
|
Whenever I've seen footage of Blur playing live Ive always thought how crap they are as a live act. Coxon is an incredibly talented guitarist in amongst the rest of the rubbish but I'm never tempted to pay to see them. As for Albarns vocals, you could get Danny Dyer up on stage and I doubt anyone would notice the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,755
|
i think that if someone who has no knowlege of blur, watched that performance for a lifetime award, theyd be thinking 'wtf'?...
piss poor performance for seasoned musicians. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,030
|
I did see them at Glastonbury a couple of years ago, I was not a huge fan, but have to say it was a magnificent performance
Second only to Neil Young that year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,403
|
As much as I like Blur it wasn't great. When Phil and Damon were up there together is was like two drunken Dads getting up to sing karaoke together in Malia. Just wasn't there that night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,339
|
I gave up after the first minute and went to bed
They sounded awful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,554
|
One question, why wasn't Damon given a wireless microphone?
Half the time it seemed to be getting tangled up! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,999
|
Albarn has never been a great vocalist...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London Town
Posts: 8,791
|
Tender and This is a Low were both amazing. Girls and Boys could've been better but I have no idea why they chose to do Parklife. I guess it's audience friendly.
I'm surprised they didn't do The Universal which is epic. I also wouldn't take anything The Daily Mail has to say with any respect or credibility, especially Paul Connolly who is more use to reviewing X Factor hopefuls than talented bands. Also their Hyde Park gig of 80,000 people sold out in 30 minutes this morning. Hardly a sign of poor reception! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,899
|
Quote:
I'm not sure why they agreed to appear. They seemed out of place and i can't see what was in it for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,071
|
Quote:
I'm not sure why they agreed to appear. They seemed out of place and i can't see what was in it for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,373
|
Quote:
Perhaps the fact they had a huge show going on sale 3 days later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 620
|
I can't say I was impressed by the Brits performance but I saw Blur in '95 and honestly, I'd still regard it as a great concert probably because, as others have mentioned, of the atmosphere and energy the band creates.
Incidentally, I thought the best part of the Brits performance was the part that was relegated to ITV2 (Tender and This is a Low). |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London Town
Posts: 8,791
|
Quote:
Suspect it was more to do with them being the Olympics closing concert headline act, trying to make them recognisable to the world wide audience again, suspect most people across the globe won't have a clue who Blur are and after that performance won't care!
The fact Paul Connolly can't even read a simple press statement and has twisted the facts to make it look worse than it is, pretty sums up the integrity and quality of journalism at the Daily Mail. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,931
|
I like Blur but they were pretty poor at the Brits. Damon sounded quite bad and was out of time with the songs quite often, I think the band itself (playing the instruments) sounded alright though
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,966
|
They always sounded bloody awful live.I never saw the attraction of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 654
|
They were terrible.
It looked to me as if they thought they were above rehearsing, didn't bother, tried winging it and failed horribly. Get orf my rubbish awards show! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:33.



They sounded awful.