DS Forums

 
 

Matt Cardle - Amazing 3rd Single :) Chart


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28-02-2012, 16:15
Masterjonboi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,021

Wow This charted at 84 Which is pretty good

With an epic,emotional version of the first time on it as well

Masterjonboi is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 28-02-2012, 16:21
MrMeatAndPotato
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,230
Charting 84 is good? Such high expectations then
MrMeatAndPotato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 16:22
little-monster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
84 is awful
I wish i had your positive thinking
little-monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 17:46
Monster101
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,786
84 is pretty good???? lol
wow, number 1 must make you hyperventilate ...
hes got 1 more album before hes dropped like a hot brick.
Monster101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 21:19
kyleee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 334
84 is a terrible chart position....yet another flop single!
kyleee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 21:36
jackbell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,109
His last single, Starlight, got to number 185. So that's an improvement.
jackbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 21:37
FanFromHolland
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,930
Easily inpressed me thinks
FanFromHolland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 21:46
Kanzi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Yeovil
Posts: 877
'Starlight' was better.
Kanzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 22:11
Carly_Thompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,288
Wow I never would have thought I'd see the day where somebody said that a song charting at #84 was good. I'm sorry, I'm no hater, but that is a terrible position to chart at!

I'm surprised they're even releasing a third single to be honest. It's painfully obvious that this album is dead in the water and that there isn't enough interest in Matt. His first single was bland and people lost interest very quickly, radio didn't play his stuff and nor did the music channel's. That will continue throughout the rest of this album.

If he comes back with a second album and a killer single then they might start supporting him, but any single he releases off this album now just won't get the support of radio's etc.
Carly_Thompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2012, 22:20
iseloid
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9,202
Wow I never would have thought I'd see the day where somebody said that a song charting at #84 was good. I'm sorry, I'm no hater, but that is a terrible position to chart at!

I'm surprised they're even releasing a third single to be honest. It's painfully obvious that this album is dead in the water and that there isn't enough interest in Matt. His first single was bland and people lost interest very quickly, radio didn't play his stuff and nor did the music channel's. That will continue throughout the rest of this album.

If he comes back with a second album and a killer single then they might start supporting him, but any single he releases off this album now just won't get the support of radio's etc.
Starlight was incredible. He should've promoted that more IMO. His album should've been stripped back a bit. Walking on water is awful on the album, but is stunning acoustic. And that's coming from someone who couldn't stand Matt's voice on the show, either he isn't smoking anymore, has learned to sing, and isn't shouting. I bet it's all 3.
iseloid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 01:40
gpk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Penryn, Falmouth, Cornwall.
Posts: 10,034
its not really good in all honesty, is it? however, he is one of those artists that will struggle with singles by the looks of it. i wouldn't consider him a huge album seller either, but he has sold enough to warrant a second release. although, i saw his album in a shop today and it was £5. so i cant see much money being made off this release to be frank.

looking at the positive, he is one of the only two x factor male winners to have a platinum album. considering there have been 5 male winners, that`s not too bad.
gpk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 03:26
Jonesy88
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,539
its not really good in all honesty, is it? however, he is one of those artists that will struggle with singles by the looks of it. i wouldn't consider him a huge album seller either, but he has sold enough to warrant a second release. although, i saw his album in a shop today and it was £5. so i cant see much money being made off this release to be frank.

looking at the positive, he is one of the only two x factor male winners to have a platinum album. considering there have been 5 male winners, that`s not too bad.
Yes, looking at the positives is good.
Jonesy88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 09:47
my name is joe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In England
Posts: 4,349
Wow This charted at 84 Which is pretty good

With an epic,emotional version of the first time on it as well

if i was a fan that's the bit that would concern me most about its chart position, not so much the song lifted from the album. I thought that a very popular performance of his and would be downloaded like crazy
my name is joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 09:52
harveybest
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,030
That's somewhere between 2200- 2600 sold.
harveybest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 09:58
Slojo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,429
I think we need to agree from the outset is this

1 - A Buzz Single

2 - Something "just for the fans" or

3 - A real single

Slojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 10:01
belfastbobby
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 559
Matt has to face the fact hes not that good now the hype has gone.
belfastbobby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 10:04
little-monster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
I think Matt is great but his own material is so bland and boring. He had nothing relevent to write and sing about.
little-monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 19:26
charmingbilly
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,652
Wow This charted at 84 Which is pretty good
His last single, Starlight, got to number 185. So that's an improvement.


Wow I never would have thought I'd see the day where somebody said that a song charting at #84 was good.
Matt's fans have a mantra, it goes like this:

"Matt is doing really well."

So well that he was dropped by Modest Management in December, but never mind...
charmingbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 19:37
Kanzi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Yeovil
Posts: 877
Matt has to face the fact hes not that good now the hype has gone.
I doubt whether the hype is there or not affects his musical merit in any way whatsoever.

Crap argument.
Kanzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 19:42
JustArun
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 8,784
What an achievement. Well done to him.
JustArun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-02-2012, 23:01
mrcynical
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,506
Maybe he could try not wailing so much. Might work.
mrcynical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2012, 01:59
3 $pirit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 3,024
84 is pretty rubbish really sorry, and 185? lol. Obviously not a singles artist
3 $pirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2012, 15:43
charmingbilly
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,652
What an achievement. Well done to him.
They missed a trick by not (re)releasing First Time I Ever I Saw Your Face for Mother's Day.
charmingbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2012, 17:16
Masterjonboi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,021
I ment it charted better than starlight :/ dont get all arsy bout it nubs

he is ov an albums seller not a singles seller which is good
Masterjonboi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2012, 19:17
VoodooChic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I am MALE
Posts: 8,267
They missed a trick by not (re)releasing First Time I Ever I Saw Your Face for Mother's Day.
That would be beyond naff - like those godawful compilations
VoodooChic is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:09.