|
||||||||
Matt Cardle - Amazing 3rd Single :) Chart |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,021
|
Matt Cardle - Amazing 3rd Single :) Chart
Wow This charted at 84 Which is pretty good
With an epic,emotional version of the first time on it as well
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,230
|
Charting 84 is good? Such high expectations then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
84 is awful
I wish i had your positive thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,786
|
84 is pretty good???? lol
wow, number 1 must make you hyperventilate ... hes got 1 more album before hes dropped like a hot brick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 334
|
84 is a terrible chart position....yet another flop single!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,109
|
His last single, Starlight, got to number 185. So that's an improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,930
|
Easily inpressed me thinks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Yeovil
Posts: 877
|
'Starlight' was better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,288
|
Wow I never would have thought I'd see the day where somebody said that a song charting at #84 was good. I'm sorry, I'm no hater, but that is a terrible position to chart at!
I'm surprised they're even releasing a third single to be honest. It's painfully obvious that this album is dead in the water and that there isn't enough interest in Matt. His first single was bland and people lost interest very quickly, radio didn't play his stuff and nor did the music channel's. That will continue throughout the rest of this album. If he comes back with a second album and a killer single then they might start supporting him, but any single he releases off this album now just won't get the support of radio's etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9,202
|
Quote:
Wow I never would have thought I'd see the day where somebody said that a song charting at #84 was good. I'm sorry, I'm no hater, but that is a terrible position to chart at!
I'm surprised they're even releasing a third single to be honest. It's painfully obvious that this album is dead in the water and that there isn't enough interest in Matt. His first single was bland and people lost interest very quickly, radio didn't play his stuff and nor did the music channel's. That will continue throughout the rest of this album. If he comes back with a second album and a killer single then they might start supporting him, but any single he releases off this album now just won't get the support of radio's etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Penryn, Falmouth, Cornwall.
Posts: 10,034
|
its not really good in all honesty, is it? however, he is one of those artists that will struggle with singles by the looks of it. i wouldn't consider him a huge album seller either, but he has sold enough to warrant a second release. although, i saw his album in a shop today and it was £5. so i cant see much money being made off this release to be frank.
looking at the positive, he is one of the only two x factor male winners to have a platinum album. considering there have been 5 male winners, that`s not too bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,539
|
Quote:
its not really good in all honesty, is it? however, he is one of those artists that will struggle with singles by the looks of it. i wouldn't consider him a huge album seller either, but he has sold enough to warrant a second release. although, i saw his album in a shop today and it was £5. so i cant see much money being made off this release to be frank.
looking at the positive, he is one of the only two x factor male winners to have a platinum album. considering there have been 5 male winners, that`s not too bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In England
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
Wow This charted at 84 Which is pretty good
With an epic,emotional version of the first time on it as well ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,030
|
That's somewhere between 2200- 2600 sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,429
|
I think we need to agree from the outset is this
1 - A Buzz Single 2 - Something "just for the fans" or 3 - A real single
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 559
|
Matt has to face the fact hes not that good now the hype has gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
I think Matt is great but his own material is so bland and boring. He had nothing relevent to write and sing about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
Wow This charted at 84 Which is pretty good
Quote:
His last single, Starlight, got to number 185. So that's an improvement.
![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
Wow I never would have thought I'd see the day where somebody said that a song charting at #84 was good.
"Matt is doing really well." So well that he was dropped by Modest Management in December, but never mind...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Yeovil
Posts: 877
|
Quote:
Matt has to face the fact hes not that good now the hype has gone.
Crap argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 8,784
|
What an achievement. Well done to him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,506
|
Maybe he could try not wailing so much. Might work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 3,024
|
84 is pretty rubbish really sorry, and 185? lol. Obviously not a singles artist
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
What an achievement. Well done to him.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,021
|
I ment it charted better than starlight :/ dont get all arsy bout it nubs
he is ov an albums seller not a singles seller which is good |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I am MALE
Posts: 8,267
|
Quote:
They missed a trick by not (re)releasing First Time I Ever I Saw Your Face for Mother's Day.
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:09.


