Originally Posted by
homer2012:
“yawn. get some sleep.
thank you for giving your songs by boybands you like
early beatles stuff would today be classed as boyband material, thats all i'm saying so dont trollor expect me to reply”
and thats the problem.... a young generation are trying to re-write what the definition is...
why is early beatles material classed as 'boyband material'?... because they have an appeal to a young female audience?...but ALL acts have had that to one degree or another! from elvis to jimi hendrix, the beatles to led zeppelin...
you cannot group together any act who can compose, play, perform, in the same generic class as a group of manufactured karaoke ballad singers.
theres a million miles between the beatles, duran duran, spandau ballet, busted, mcfly, and westlife, boyzone, 5ive etc etc etc. with the ONLY simularity being they had a larger then most female fanbase. ridiculous.