• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Past Reality Shows
  • Dancing On Ice: All Stars
Dancing on Ice 2012 - Week 10 - 11th March 2012 - 7.15pm and 9.30pm
<<
<
37 of 37
>>
>
geordiegump
11-03-2012
Originally Posted by norbitonite:
“First of all, congratulations to your son-in-law and the rest of the team. Always particularly gratifying to win at the Parc des Princes!

I agree that Chemmy would be a great TV presenter. I've watched some video tips she recorded on how to drive in the snow, and she's a natural.”

Many thanks....I think she would have a great future in TV presenting....I wish her every success
whoyouarexo
11-03-2012
Originally Posted by Patti-Ann:
“Team Challenge week he finished up 5th out of 6”

Wasnt it 4th?
norbitonite
11-03-2012
Originally Posted by whoyouarexo:
“Wasnt it 4th?”

It was. He topped the leaderboard for the regular routine, and fell to 4th when the girls' scores were doubled after the team challenge.
TheAuburnEnigma
11-03-2012
Originally Posted by storminmike:
“That doesn't work four 5s

This does....and the only way Jen avoided the bottom

Jen 2 + 4 = 6- SAFE
Matthew 5 + 3 = 8 - SAFE
Jorgie 1 + 5 = 6 - SAFE
Chemmy 3 + 2 = 5 - B2
Chico 4 + 1 = 5 - B2”

Actually it does work - I'm pretty sure it's the same rule as on Strictly where if 2 contestants have the same overall points, then the one who had more of a public vote is ranked higher for the purposes of bottom 2/skate-off. In the case of the previous vote calculation, Jen and Jorgie would have been safe due to having more public votes than Chico and Chemmy, which could very well be what happened tonight.

Either way, Chico was definitely bottom of the public vote, and Chemmy was definitely second bottom. Jen had to get at least 3 points from the vote to be safe, and Jorgie had to get at least 4 to be safe. It's only Matt that it's a little uncertain for.
Mela80
11-03-2012
I've loved this show since it's started and have always been aware of the need for votes on all these formats. This is the first year I've felt it's really trying too hard.

If it's all logical I can understand but tonight wasn't. When a person is given a routine and skates it beautifully and makes no mistakes with the props included I believe that should be appreciated. Everyone did.

But this is the first year I've felt things are being pushed too far one way or the other. I like to feel I have a choice for who I am supporting but I know now I don't. I won't mention it, just in case no-one wants it spoiled but it's not who you think.

I have to say, and it's just my opinion (and doesn't seem to be shared by anyone on here so I'm putting on some armour), Matthew is deliberately being over-marked. I technically agree with his tremendous skating ability but he does have areas that he has to improve on. His execution of moves is excellent but that's what they are - the general execution of moves in the right place at the right time. I don't know if he feels the music or, for an actor this is important, can perform a part. (I know he didn't win but see Chris Fountain for example, he was totally lost in cry me a river right 'til the end) Every move, every skill, every spin I know what's coming next - a knowing look and a 'look at me' gratification. He knows before he's even finished a move that he's going to do it properly and that he's going to get praise for it. It drives me nuts. However the cuter a guy is the more people forgive.

I am not going to choose anyone above others but if he's perfect (and has been from day one) why is he in a show that's for people to learn a new skill and gradually improve until the end? He's plateaued and no-one has mentioned he needs to up his performance and really invest in the whole performance to top it off.
And these guys are professionals!! They should know this.

It's not about technical ability for the audience, that's why we vote (and for the money). For us, in general, it's [i]usually[i] about character and skill development. To see Chico deliver amazing routines and give us inspiring words, for Jen to finally conquer her demons and find the confidence in performing, for Chemmy to fight back from potential paralysis and show courage, for Jorgie's performance skills and gracious nature, for Sebastian's determination and unique moves, for Sam's self-development and ability... I could go on. For all of these positives their negatives have to either be minimal or non-existent. It's tricky. And if that's not the point of this competition, if it's only the judges opinions that matter, take the phone vote away.

Grow in all you do, be the best you can be, come back from the brink and leave all with a good feeling. If you only care about yourself you might be the only one.

I'm feeling far too deep tonight, I have spraffed on and talked absolute cr@p but I just had to get it out there. Sorry to upset anyone, resume normal transmission in 3...2....1.
footygirl
12-03-2012
Originally Posted by TheAuburnEnigma:
“Actually it does work - I'm pretty sure it's the same rule as on Strictly where if 2 contestants have the same overall points, then the one who had more of a public vote is ranked higher for the purposes of bottom 2/skate-off. In the case of the previous vote calculation, Jen and Jorgie would have been safe due to having more public votes than Chico and Chemmy, which could very well be what happened tonight.

Either way, Chico was definitely bottom of the public vote, and Chemmy was definitely second bottom. Jen had to get at least 3 points from the vote to be safe, and Jorgie had to get at least 4 to be safe. It's only Matt that it's a little uncertain for.”

i am not so sure, chico could have got 2 public votes and been in the skate off because jorgie and jen(god knows why) would be on 6 but received higher amounts of public votes
Oldnjaded
12-03-2012
Originally Posted by Striker22:
“Hog on ice has gone! Hog on ice has gone!.........................yippppppeeeeee yaaaaaayyyyyyyyy”

Nasty and ridiculous.
<<
<
37 of 37
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map