Originally Posted by jerseyporter:
“Lots of criticism for Louie's low mark for Jorgie last night - makes a change, usually he's torn apart on here for what people perceive as over-marking! So maybe a bit of 'damned if he does, damned if he doesn't'... but as far as I can recall this series it's the first time that one judge has marked noticeably (as in more than 1.5 or 2 marks) lower than the other two - and that's if we're taking Robin's word for the fact that his score came up wrong. (I am - he has no reason to fib about it and never usually has any difficulty justifying any score he gives which is widely different from any other judge.)
So tearing Louie apart now, for this one occasion where his mark was 2 marks lower than Robin's and Katrina's seems a tad unfair and an over-reaction. I wonder if those who are the most vociferous about Louie's mark are also those who dislike him the most too.
FWIW I watched Jorgie's routine back today and, although I could sort of see that her choreography was supposed to be telling a sort of 'boy meeets girl' story through the ribbon (at least, that's what I interpreted it to be!) it didn't quite come off. Whether that was because she was preoccupied with the ribbon or worrying about the throw to Matt or whatever I don't know, but it did seem a bit 'flat' in its execution.
But, as ever, all of our opinions are just that - subjective opinions - when it comes to judging emotion and use of the prop. I'm prepared to listen to any skaters on the forums who can spot the skating skills (or not - and some seem to think that Jorgie IS still lacking in some key skills) because I don't skate and I have to take their word for it.
But to slate Louie for one low mark which he was entitled to give (again, subjective opinion) seems unfair to him. We can't all like the same thing, and he gave his comments without any nastiness, just gave his reasons whether we agreed with them or not. And, guess what - even the 'favourites' can sometimes get duff marks. There isn't a rule which says marked high one week, marked high every week is there?
Personally I found Chemmy's routine much more fun and exciting to watch last night than Jorgie's (and she didn't deserve to go home on that performance - Jen, however, should have gone, but that's a subject for a different thread, lol!) but if that's down to T and D getting her choreography wrong then Jorgie can't carry all the blame for that.”
For completeness sake :
Week 1 : Andy A (Louie scores 1.5 lower than Robin, 2.0 lower than Katarina)
Week 2 : Nobody
Week 3 : Jennifer (Robin scores 1.5 lower than both Louie & Katarina), Matthew (Louie scores 1.5 lower than Katarina, 2.0 lower than Robin), Sebastien (Louie scores 1.5 lower than both Robin & Katarina), Sam (Katarina scores 1.5 higher than Robin, 2.0 higher than Louie), Chemmy (Katarina scores 1.5 higher than both Robin & Louie)
Week 4 : Nobody
Week 5 : Chemmy (Louie scores 1.5 lower than Katarina, 2.0 lower than Robin), Matthew (Katarina scores 1.5 lower than Robin, 2.0 lower than Louie), Rosemary (Katarina scores 1.5 higher than Robin, 2.0 higher than Louie)
Week 6 : Chemmy (Louie scores 1.5 lower than Robin, 2.0 lower than Katarina), Jennifer (Louie scores 1.5 higher than Katarina, 2.0 higher than Robin)
Week 7 : Heidi (Louie scores 1.5 higher than Robin, 2.0 higher than Katarina)
Week 8 : Nobody
Week 9 : Nobody
Week 10 : Jorgie (Louie scores 1.5 lower than Katarina, 2.0 lower than Robin).
It's not actually been that uncommon for one of the judges to make themselves an outlier to the other 2, although I can see why it drew more attention this time than any other. The only other time I remember it causing this much comment is when Katarina went coo-coo for Rosemary.