I'm looking to replace my current TV which is on it's last legs, and am considering replacements, with a fully HD TV on my list of must have's, as well as a minimum of 100 HZ's. At present I only have a regular Sky+ box (not HD) and a Samsung 5.1 surround sound system with DVD player (HT D550 I think).
Will I notice a picture improvement over my current CRT TV (50HZ) despite not having an HD box when watching TV? The DVD player is upscaleable, and so I presume I will get a better quality DVD picture (though not BluRay quality). Correct me if I'm wrong!
I had a decided on an LED rather than LCD, but have read that sound quality can be comparatively poor - not a problem for me as I'll always switch the surround on, but my wife relies on TV sound on the whole. How noticeable is this?
The item I'm currently considering is the Samsung UE32D5000, which is available for £349. Any negative comments on this TV welcomed. I've read occasional comments re picture blur, which I thought wouldn't have been as much of an issue with a 100hz tv vs a 50hz, but again correct me if I'm wrong! Would there be less blur on a 200HZ?
Will I notice a picture improvement over my current CRT TV (50HZ) despite not having an HD box when watching TV? The DVD player is upscaleable, and so I presume I will get a better quality DVD picture (though not BluRay quality). Correct me if I'm wrong!
I had a decided on an LED rather than LCD, but have read that sound quality can be comparatively poor - not a problem for me as I'll always switch the surround on, but my wife relies on TV sound on the whole. How noticeable is this?
The item I'm currently considering is the Samsung UE32D5000, which is available for £349. Any negative comments on this TV welcomed. I've read occasional comments re picture blur, which I thought wouldn't have been as much of an issue with a 100hz tv vs a 50hz, but again correct me if I'm wrong! Would there be less blur on a 200HZ?



