• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 33)
<<
<
105 of 125
>>
>
iaindb
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by ronant:
“Tweet from Sam Hodges just now:

@Sam_Hodges: Very gentlemanly tweet from @SimonCowell appears to agree adding +1 channels doesn't make for a straight comparison. #TheVoiceUK”

Deep danger here of reigniting a long-running debate in this thread
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“Deep danger here of reigniting a long-running debate in this thread”

There's already one going on The Voice forum.
Charnham
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Sorry, you've lost me. ”

ok, why would someone who likes BGT the best, be watching the end of The Voice, when they could be watching BGT?

It would be like me watching the 2nd half of a Primeval episode, when I could be watching Doctor Who, when its more likely in that situation I would delay my viewing of Primeval, and watch it later in the evening.

Originally Posted by iaindb:
“Deep danger here of reigniting a long-running debate in this thread”

its like he wrote that last bit just for us.
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“ok, why would someone who likes BGT the best, be watching the end of The Voice, when they could be watching BGT?

It would be like me watching the 2nd half of a Primeval episode, when I could be watching Doctor Who, when its more likely in that situation I would delay my viewing of Primeval, and watch it later in the evening.”

But if you're enjoying Primeval why would you switch over - even if you did prefer Doctor Who? When you'd be able to record Doctor Who or use a catch up device or watch it on iplayer? Once you've started watching something you may as well finish it if you're enjoying it.
iaindb
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“The problem with light entertainment in general at the moment and ITV in particular is that with only a couple of exceptions everything that makes the air essentially has the one line pitch of 'its like.... [insert hit show here]' and nothing else except maybe 'with celebrities'. Far too much of the output is just a slight variation on The X Factor or Britain's Got Talent or Strictly Come Dancing or The Apprentice or I'm A Celebrity with absolutely no thought given to whether its a good show that people will want to watch or not and next to no effort put into producing it.

At this stage what ITV desperately needs to do is stop using a pre-existing show as the template for all their new commissions and just look for a show that actually works in its own right. As much The Voice was labelled as a derivative of The X Factor and tried to cash-in on that before its launch what's important to remember is that it is a show that works in its own right. It has its own style, tone and purpose and that's what people have reacted to and why its growing week-on-week. Essentially what I'm saying ITV need is new shows with their own voice and identity and they are perfectly capable of doing that when they try – Take Me Out is hardly the most ground breaking or original show but it works because it has its own identity away from its predecessors.

Red or Black is I think the high or low (depending on your point of view) point of this style of commissioning. Absolutely every single part of that show was cherry picked from other successful formats and just awkwardly stuck together. ITV (and SyCo) though it would be huge because it had all these successful parts but completely forgot to spend any time working out if it was watchable and crafting anything close to an identity for the show.

Of course the other big stumbling block for light entertainment in this day and age is the complete lack of talent to front new shows. Essentially British television has Ant & Dec and that's it. And even they've struggled lately. Its really pretty easy to roll out endless talent shows and the like because the hosts of those aren't all important but for just about any other format they are. Game shows live or die on the presenter and outside of Ant & Dec who would be able to hold together a modern day Noel's House Party? I suspect in decades gone by when there was a wealth of talent to develop shows for developing new light entertainment was a little bit easier and more important.

”

In defence of LE commissioners, television is quite old and it's difficult to come up with a brand new format. BGT, for instance, has elements of Opportunity Knocks, New Faces, Michael Barrymore's My KInd Of People and The Gong Show about it. And Ant and Dec have been pretty open about the influence of Noel's House Party on Saturday Night Takeaway.
Charnham
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“But if you're enjoying Primeval why would you switch over - even if you did prefer Doctor Who? When you'd be able to record Doctor Who or use a catch up device or watch it on iplayer? Once you've started watching something you may as well finish it if you're enjoying it.”

Record Doctor Who, and not watch it live, what madness is this? (actually I do both, i watch it live, and record it.

However I would do it because I like Doctor Who more than Primeval.
Sad_BB_Addict
08-04-2012
Dan Wootton blog on Voice v BGT
http://danwootton.tumblr.com/
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“Record Doctor Who, and not watch it live, what madness is this? (actually I do both, i watch it live, and record it.

However I would do it because I like Doctor Who more than Primeval.”

So you would enjoy a show for 45 minutes and then switch sides instead of watching it to it's conclusion?
Charnham
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“So you would enjoy a show for 45 minutes and then switch sides instead of watching it to it's conclusion? ”

if I liked BGT the most, I would want to watch it live from the start.

I dont know why watching a favourite program live, is so hard for people to grasp.
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“if I liked BGT the most, I would want to watch it live from the start.

I dont know why watching a favourite program live, is so hard for people to grasp.”

I don't think I'd bother. If I was liking something on the other side I would watch the conclusion of that then catch up on the later show.

I'd agree if it was a live show but when it's just an audition package it doesn't seem to be that much of an issue how you watch the show.

I doubt this'll happen for me to be proven right or wrong, but I have the feeling that if The Voice and Britain's Got Talent clashed directly head to head The Voice's clash rating would decrease and BGT's clash rating would increase.
iaindb
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“So you would enjoy a show for 45 minutes and then switch sides instead of watching it to it's conclusion? ”

You could catch the conclusion later on the internet or on a recording. Or if it's a light entertainment programme it may be no hardship to miss the last quarter hour.

Yesterday my mum watched YBF at 7pm but switched over to DOND at 7.15 and didn't bother with the rest of YBF. No problem.

As The Voice is at the audition stage you wouldn't miss anything of great significence if you don't see the last twenty minutes.
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“You could catch the conclusion later on the internet or on a recording. Or if it's a light entertainment programme it may be no hardship to miss the last quarter hour.

Yesterday my mum watched YBF at 7pm but switched over to DOND at 7.15 and didn't bother with the rest of YBF. No problem.

As The Voice is at the audition stage you wouldn't miss anything of great significence if you don't see the last twenty minutes.”

I did the same with the first week of The Voice; watched 30 minutes then switched to TV Burp - but that's because I wasn't enjoying the former. I guess if people were watching The Voice as time filler before Britain's Got Talent then it makes sense for them to switch over; but if they're actively enjoying it they would be more likely to finish watching it and then catch up on the latter.

Look at the soap clashes. Emmerdale tends to lose against EastEnders when kept seperate yet is capabale of beating it when it clashes after a 30 minute headstart. If EastEnders had the headstart would Emmerdale still beat it...?
RobbieSykes123
08-04-2012
I wonder if it was my tweet to Cowell earlier that prompted his gritted teeth concession?

Is the "Danny" to whom he refers the pop nobody who is a Voice judge or the rival channel controller who has ensured Cowell's other crown jewel has also come off second best on Saturdays?
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“I wonder if it was my tweet to Cowell earlier that prompted his gritted teeth concession?

Is the "Danny" to whom he refers the pop nobody who is a Voice judge or the rival channel controller who has ensured Cowell's other crown jewel has also come off second best on Saturdays? ”

I'm starting to think that your hatred of The Voice was all a front, Robbie.
RobbieSykes123
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by ronant:
“Tweet from Sam Hodges just now:

@Sam_Hodges: Very gentlemanly tweet from @SimonCowell appears to agree adding +1 channels doesn't make for a straight comparison. #TheVoiceUK”



The shocks keep coming today!

So Cowell agrees with me then on the aggregation issue?

Top bloke.
SamuelW
08-04-2012
You dont have to be a rocket scientist to work out if theres two popular shows which are similar, the programme being shown first will beat the other show head to head, especially with Sky+ and +1 channels around. Even I know and will admit that. But for The Voice to be in that position already is quite remarkable, I dont think anyone thought a month ago it would be getting 9.5million in week three and even beating BGT. And thats just the overnight ratings, consolidated ratings can be near 11million for it. I still laugh that Itv brought this all to themselves, if theyd scheduled Bgt at 8.20pm itd have been the top show every week and there wouldve been no one talking about the Voice beating it head to head .
RobbieSykes123
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“I'm starting to think that your hatred of The Voice was all a front, Robbie. ”

I watched some of it last night. Even my lust for Jessie J isn't enough to keep me tuning in to a rather dull show that is a blatant rip off of the Cowellised talent show format.
cylon6
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Sad_BB_Addict:
“Dan Wootton blog on Voice v BGT
http://danwootton.tumblr.com/”

He's being positive about The Voice!!
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“You dont have to be a rocket scientist to work out if theres two popular shows which are similar, the programme being shown first will beat the other show head to head, especially with Sky+ and +1 channels around. Even I know and will admit that. But for The Voice to be in that position already is quite remarkable, I dont think anyone thought a month ago it would be getting 9.5million in week three and even beating BGT. And thats just the overnight ratings, consolidated ratings can be near 11million for it. I still laugh that Itv brought this to themselves, if they scheduled Bgt at 8.20pm itd have been the top show every week and there wouldve been no one talking about the Voice beating it head to head .”

The problem is ITV can't move it now; it'd look like a retreat and the show can't really afford that - let's be rational for a moment, it still rated well.

I think the original idea was to try and force The Voice back as far as possible and it succeeded in getting it to start at 7pm. If they had scheduled it later then BBC One would've scheduled The Voice later and so on.
iaindb
08-04-2012
Talking of ITV and their struggles with LE formats, it seems that The One And Only Des O'Connor is less a celebration of Des's 80th birthday and 50 years in showbusiness and more a new edition of Des O'Connor Tonight. So Matt Lucas is a guest on the show not so much because he's a Des fan but because he happened to be on the chat-show circuit plugging his new TV show at the time of transmission.

Compare with the BBC's celebration of Bruce Forsyth's 80th birthday in 2008, where it's actually a programme about its star.

Maybe ITV are testing the water to see if they should bring back DOC Tonight for a series. If they're serious about doing more LE shows for weekday slots, they could have it planned for Wednesday at 8 or Friday at 9.
cylon6
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“I watched some of it last night. Even my lust for Jessie J isn't enough to keep me tuning in to a rather dull show that is a blatant rip off of the Cowellised talent show format.”

You too eh?
Chris1964
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“I watched some of it last night. Even my lust for Jessie J isn't enough to keep me tuning in to a rather dull show that is a blatant rip off of the Cowellised talent show format.”

Jessie J is brilliant. Shes got everything, shes quirky, charming, good looking and shows her emotions. Great find for the show and I can see why Cowell wanted her(if that was the true case).
The judges do work well together, and with a set of judges comes the whole package of secondary gossip, press interest and who is in/out etc. Somewhat scary for the Beeb as judges have hardly been an issue in their other talent shows and they have only ever had one controversy-the ageism/Arlene thing.
Chris1964
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“Talking of ITV and their struggles with LE formats, it seems that The One And Only Des O'Connor is less a celebration of Des's 80th birthday and 50 years in showbusiness and more a new edition of Des O'Connor Tonight. So Matt Lucas is a guest on the show not so much because he's a Des fan but because he happened to be on the chat-show circuit plugging his new TV show at the time of transmission.

Compare with the BBC's celebration of Bruce Forsyth's 80th birthday in 2008, where it's actually a programme about its star.

Maybe ITV are testing the water to see if they should bring back DOC Tonight for a series. If they're serious about doing more LE shows for weekday slots, they could have it planned for Wednesday at 8 or Friday at 9.”

Now there is an idea for a show title...........
Fudd
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“Jessie J is brilliant. Shes got everything, shes quirky, charming, good looking and shows her emotions. Great find for the show and I can see why Cowell wanted her(if that was the true case).
The judges do work well together, and with a set of judges comes the whole package of secondary gossip, press interest and who is in/out etc. Somewhat scary for the Beeb as judges have hardly been an issue in their other talent shows and they have only ever had one controversy-the ageism/Arlene thing.”

I reckon it'll scrape the 3m mark if it's lucky. I wonder whether that result would scrap that particular dream.
grimshaw
08-04-2012
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“He's being positive about The Voice!! ”

Wootton, and I hope other users don't think am being too harsh here, is one of many snakes in the media. He'll slip into any bed he thinks will take him.

Hes hardly being positive. Ensuring he doesn't back it completly, and in fact scrapes the same muck off his wings by claiming it fell in other countries AGAIN, despite being untrue.

As any snake without a real bite he won't upset anyone.
Just try and make himself liked by those more powerful than him.

Pathetic man am afraid. Not much of a snake either, no venom to actually affect anything.
He uses 'peaks' when everyone knows their a stupid ****ing measurement. Like, co'mon now!


He wants exclusive content from ITV/BBC. I think he'll be disappointed as The Voice isn't the show to sell out its contestants to the likes of Wootton. That is all he wants. And a bit of ego too.

He won't last. These types come and go soon as they look at the wrong diva the wrong way.
<<
<
105 of 125
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map