• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 33)
<<
<
123 of 125
>>
>
AlexiR
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Newcastle:
“Just to clarify, that's in the 18-49 demo not total viewers.”

So where it matters then

Originally Posted by Score:
“I'm pretty sure they won't do a combined show, especially after it didn't work on Strictly the year they did one. If they're doing 10 performances in the battle round shows in 90 mins then I guess that'll be the length they'll go for. Worth noting that the US show's first series also had group performances included in those 90 mins (actually probably closer to 80 mins) which could be shifted to the results shows, which I'd run on Sundays, probably for 45 mins with group performances, guests etc, a bit like XF's Sunday show. It'd rate better on Sundays than late on Saturdays and would benefit their schedule as a whole more by boosting Sundays. Seems a no brainer to me.”

If they went for a combined show (which I agree seems unlikely now the show has proven successful) then it wouldn't be the same structure as the combined Strictly show. The vote would take place over the week with acts being eliminated on the next live show. The alternating between different coaches teams structure of the live shows allows that. So they wouldn't have to find 15-30 minutes filler whilst the vote lines were open and votes counted etc.

I think that works well but I've given up hope of it happening.
Newcastle
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“So where it matters then ”

This thread usually discusses viewing figures not ratings, just clarifying in case anyone tries to make any links to the performance of TVUK
Score
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“If they went for a combined show (which I agree seems unlikely now the show has proven successful) then it wouldn't be the same structure as the combined Strictly show. The vote would take place over the week with acts being eliminated on the next live show. The alternating between different coaches teams structure of the live shows allows that. So they wouldn't have to find 15-30 minutes filler whilst the vote lines were open and votes counted etc.

I think that works well but I've given up hope of it happening.”

Nah I think if they went for a combined show they'd still have the eliminations on the same night as performances - leaving a week is a really clunky way of doing it that would be very unpopular over here. I can see why they had to do it in the US and they're more used to it there (I still don't like it though) but I definitely think they should avoid doing that.

Not that it matters though as I doubt they'll do a combined show at all.
happy tv
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Bushmills:
“5.4m for The Syndicate

3m for Mighty Mississippi (3.3m inc +1)

Elsewhere, BBC Breakfast's move to Salford had no discernible ratings effect. It averaged 1.4m against 600,000 for Daybreak.”

Lorraine at 8.30am had 1.1 million. The sooner she gets to front the show, the better. It might be the only way to save Daybreak now.

This thread seems to have become a BGT V the Voice one. You would think that they are the only shows in town
Pizzatheaction
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Steve Williams:
“I think the plan was for the Late Late to run past Christmas 1986 but it didn't for obvious reasons.”

Yeah, that's right. I remember watching the first edition of that 1986 series, and Noel said it would be on every week until the spring.
T Penery
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Steve Williams:
“Loads of lottery quizzes have flopped, though, like This Time Tomorrow and Millionaire Manor (which had a ridiculously long run, about sixteen weeks).”

Don't forget The People's Quiz which rated so badly, The National Lottery wanted nothing to do with them and pulled the branding half way through the series.
cylon6
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by happy tv:
“Lorraine at 8.30am had 1.1 million. The sooner she gets to front the show, the better. It might be the only way to save Daybreak now.

This thread seems to have become a BGT V the Voice one. You would think that they are the only shows in town”

Lorraine is getting 1.1m even while Lorraine has been off for weeks recovering from a horse riding accident. Much like Breakfast it seems a shows reputation can have amazing viewer loyalty no matter who is hosting it. As for BGT & The Voice ratings wise they ARE the only shows in town!
Dancc
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by happy tv:
“Lorraine at 8.30am had 1.1 million. The sooner she gets to front the show, the better. It might be the only way to save Daybreak now.

This thread seems to have become a BGT V the Voice one. You would think that they are the only shows in town”

A few points...

1) The main reasons that Lorraine regularly scores a higher average are: it's shorter, and it's on at a time when more viewers are around. The difference in terms of audience share (18% v 17.1%) isn't that great.
2) Lorraine's show was presented by Helen Fospero yesterday.
Fudd
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“This should have happened ages ago. So many stories being written now about ITV moving BGT and it's an embarrassment that could have been avoided much sooner. We all told them!”

They should've kept a 15 minute clash. In a 75 minute show it's nothing and with the same ad break pattern of 31st March (start dead at 8.15pm; no break until 8.30pm) it should be enough to keep it ahead of The Voice without making Britain's Got Talent look pathetically weak - which is how it looks now. Yes, the ratings look ok for the moment but we'll see what happens on Saturday now The Voice is the scheduling king of Saturday night.

Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“In fairness they could have easily juggled the schedule and aired Take Me Out earlier. Especially after seeing that the later slot and Talent lead-in wasn't helping Take Me Out and how badly that Voice clash was denting Talent.”

Against The Voice you mean? People are already (understandably) prophesising the collapse of The Cube; what would Take Me Out have done opposite it? Down to 3m at the very least, probably. Instead, Britain's Got Talent maintained around 6m viewers and Take Me Out stayed above the 4m mark.
Pizzatheaction
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Score:
“Something that seems to have slipped under the radar:



Source: TV Scoops

So ITV have FINALLY commissioned a new sitcom series. Took them long enough! No idea what it's about or when it will air, although if it's filming now I expect it'll air in the Autumn.”

Don't want to put a dampener on things, but one is from the creators of The Royal Bodyguard.

They're actually good writers, though. They just direct their scripts to death.
happy tv
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“A few points...

1) The main reasons Lorraine has a higher average are that it's shorter and on at a time when more viewers are around. The difference in terms of audience share (18% v 17.1%) isn't that great.
2) Lorraine's show was presented by Helen Fospero yesterday.”

Lorraine always gets around the one million mark plus when she is on anyway and people also like Helen it seems so she should continue to cover when Lorraine is off. Also, Lorraine has maintained a good audience since the beginning and she does seem to have a following. I am not a fan though. I take your first point.
Dancc
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by happy tv:
“Lorraine always gets around the one million mark plus when she is on anyway and people also like Helen it seems so she should continue to cover when Lorraine is off. Also, Lorraine has maintained a good audience since the beginning and she does seem to have a following. I am not a fan though. I take your first point.”

The fact that Lorraine's stand-in is bringing in about as many viewers as Lorraine does not really support your argument that she could turn things around at Daybreak.
Score
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“Don't want to put a dampener on things, but one is from the creators of The Royal Bodyguard.

They're actually good writers, though. They just direct their scripts to death.”

Bodes well!
Pizzatheaction
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“Phil then went to some lengths to plug the new series and revealed some of what is going to happen - with details about more than one contestant, up to and including in one case how many lives they use up and what they went on to do.”

The sad thing is Phil is possibly the only person who cares very much about what happens in The Cube.
Pizzatheaction
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by jake lyle:
“Shameless and hilarious! Oh Schofe!”

It seems a bit Alan Partridge to me.
happy tv
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“The fact that Lorraine's stand-in is bringing in about as many viewers as Lorraine does not really support your argument that she could turn things around at Daybreak.”

I disagree. Lorraine has built this show and has a steady audience of 1 million plus. It is called after her and is technically her show and her audience will stay loyal to it until she returns. However, I do think they will have to improve the content of Daybreak as well.
Fudd
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“Don't want to put a dampener on things, but one is from the creators of The Royal Bodyguard.

They're actually good writers, though. They just direct their scripts to death.”

Let's hope they hire another director.

Either way 8.30pm is going to be a disaster zone for ITV1. Emmerdale appears to offer little in way of lead in at 8pm - Coronation Street is consistently down compared to Monday and Friday's - and the comedies are going to be swallowed up by the 60 minute show on BBC One. They'd be better off scheduling it in one of the Coronation Street sandwiches opposite EastEnders in my opinion - there would be less expectation and a better lead in and lead out.
Glenn A
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“On This Morning today they had the Sun entertainment chappy doing a slot promoting the best new TV this week including the new series of The Cube with Phil Schofield sat there talking to him about his own show.

Phil then went to some lengths to plug the new series and revealed some of what is going to happen - with details about more than one contestant, up to and including in one case how many lives they use up and what they went on to do.

This is certainly a novel way of promoting a game show and I suspect something to do with ITV pushing for better ratings in its new slot.”

Why don;t they rename it the Phil Schofield Show as this is all This Morning has become? Anyone got any ratings for The Wright Stuff as this is a vastly better and fresher show.
garyessex
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by 5 a day:
“I suppose that'll depend on how the next 9 episodes do. From the little I've seen of it, a large proportion of an episode seems to consist of Kiefer Sutherland chasing after his son (count the number of times he yells "Jake!").”

Yep. I gave up this week
cylon6
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“They should've kept a 15 minute clash. In a 75 minute show it's nothing and with the same ad break pattern of 31st March (start dead at 8.15pm; no break until 8.30pm) it should be enough to keep it ahead of The Voice without making Britain's Got Talent look pathetically weak - which is how it looks now. Yes, the ratings look ok for the moment but we'll see what happens on Saturday now The Voice is the scheduling king of Saturday night.”

It's ITV's scheduling incompetence that caused this mess. The first 20 minutes dragged BGT's average down and still would have meant it would have less viewers during a clash. It's still enough to dent it and has been for several weeks
Quote:
“Against The Voice you mean? People are already (understandably) prophesising the collapse of The Cube; what would Take Me Out have done opposite it? Down to 3m at the very least, probably. Instead, Britain's Got Talent maintained around 6m viewers and Take Me Out stayed above the 4m mark.”

The Cube tends to do better when it follows a popular show. Not sure it'll do well at all against The Voice.
AlexiR
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Let's hope they hire another director.

Either way 8.30pm is going to be a disaster zone for ITV1. Emmerdale appears to offer little in way of lead in at 8pm - Coronation Street is consistently down compared to Monday and Friday's - and the comedies are going to be swallowed up by the 60 minute show on BBC One. They'd be better off scheduling it in one of the Coronation Street sandwiches opposite EastEnders in my opinion - there would be less expectation and a better lead in and lead out.”

I'd put it on Saturday night after The X Factor myself. Its the best launch pad they have and would give them an excuse to push Ross back half an hour into a more comfortable and familiar slot.
Pizzatheaction
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Score:
“Bodes well! ”

I know I sound harsh, but it was incredibly frustrating watching what had the potential to be great sight gags (in The Royal Bodyguard) not working well on screen.
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Let's hope they hire another director.

Either way 8.30pm is going to be a disaster zone for ITV1. Emmerdale appears to offer little in way of lead in at 8pm - Coronation Street is consistently down compared to Monday and Friday's - and the comedies are going to be swallowed up by the 60 minute show on BBC One. They'd be better off scheduling it in one of the Coronation Street sandwiches opposite EastEnders in my opinion - there would be less expectation and a better lead in and lead out.”

It will be interesting to see if BBC One carries on with hour-long programmes on Thursdays at 8pm. I could understand Watchdog continuing as it is, but a lot of the other hour-long shows haven't been very inspiring.
Fudd
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“It's ITV's scheduling incompetence that caused this mess. The first 20 minutes dragged BGT's average down and still would have meant it would have less viewers during a clash. It's still enough to dent it and has been for several weeks”

The schedule wasn't a disaster for ITV1, really. It was the ad placement that strangled Britain's Got Talent last Saturday. But Take Me Out wasn't a complete flop in the later slot and Family Fortunes did ok for ITV filler.

Originally Posted by cylon6:
“The Cube tends to do better when it follows a popular show. Not sure it'll do well at all against The Voice.”

No; that's why I think they should've gone with Britain's Got Talent at 8.15pm and The Cube at 9.30pm. 10.30pm may be a late finish but it's not overly late considering it's a Saturday night.
jake lyle
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Steve Williams:
“Loads of lottery quizzes have flopped, though, like This Time Tomorrow and Millionaire Manor (which had a ridiculously long run, about sixteen weeks).
.”

Originally Posted by T Penery:
“Don't forget The People's Quiz which rated so badly, The National Lottery wanted nothing to do with them and pulled the branding half way through the series.”

Ahh yes I remember that it had a very long run too, it had a BBC2 daily spin off too iirc.

There was also Guestimation [the other Nick Knowles lottery show] which also flopped.

The second series of 'Come and Have a go (if you think you're smart enough)?'' adopted the lottery branding but it failed to boost it.
Fudd
11-04-2012
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“It will be interesting to see if BBC One carries on with hour-long programmes on Thursdays at 8pm. I could understand Watchdog continuing as it is, but a lot of the other hour-long shows haven't been very inspiring.”

I think it makes more sense for BBC One to air hour long shows at 8pm rather than trying to go head to head with Emmerdale, then head to head with whatever show gets the Emmerdale lead in. I'm not sure what the channel's budget is like in terms of the 9pm slot but there's no reason content wise why the likes of Who Do You Think You Are? and Masterchef can't air at 8pm really.
<<
<
123 of 125
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map