• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 33)
<<
<
77 of 125
>>
>
RobbieSykes123
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by Agent F:
“The show is massively improved on last year. The panel is stronger with Walliams turning out to be the real star signing over Alesha. His bromance with Cowell makes for great TV. Plus Simon is back, the editing is much better and it just makes for a much fresher show. Last year's series was stale and they're lucky that happened last year when The Voice wasn't here. Could have been a very different story.”

This is all tinkering round the edges. The show is still the same, a 21st century The Gong Show. It is doing better because of the "Voice vs BGT" hype, and BBC1 delivering it a large talent/reality audience inheritance on a plate.
Agent F
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“This is all tinkering round the edges. The show is still the same, a 21st century The Gong Show. It is doing better because of the "Voice vs BGT" hype, and BBC1 delivering it a large talent/reality audience inheritance on a plate.”

I've already agreed with that. However I still think the show has improved and if this had been last year's series I doubt it would have been anywhere near as resilient as it has been.
danisfunny
01-04-2012
Would anyone be able to tell me what the Voice repeat added last Sunday?
iaindb
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“This is all tinkering round the edges. The show is still the same, a 21st century The Gong Show. It is doing better because of the "Voice vs BGT" hype, and BBC1 delivering it a large talent/reality audience inheritance on a plate.”

This is a situation that suits both channels. I'm sure the BBC wouldn't expect to beat BGT so under the current arrangement, they both get the hype of a "ratings war", BGT gets to boast about having the higher average audience and higher peak but BBC1 gets to boast about winning during the head-to-head clash. The clash may dent BGT's ratings a bit but that's no big problem if the average is still higher than the equivalent show last year. Plus I believe (but don't know cos I was watched In It To Win It) that ITV held back the first commercial break until after The Voice finished so no advertisers would have suffered as the result of the clash.

As I've said before (possibly or possibly not with my tongue in cheek) a clever piece of combined scheduling by messers Cohen and Fincham.
iaindb
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by danisfunny:
“Would anyone be able to tell me what the Voice repeat added last Sunday?”

It failed to make the multichannel top 30 for the week so it was under 660,000 viewers.
Brekkie
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by Roscoe Barnes:
“TMO did OK, but out of a 12m lead-in...it does look quite poor.”

Do many series really benefit from lead ins now though. The last big series to do so (off The X Factor) is probably Downton Abbey - but for all we know that might have done just as well off it's own back.

Personally speaking nowadays I plan my viewing with much more precision, tuning in and out specifically for the shows I want, especially on the main channels.

Originally Posted by Score:
“You've got to remember though that X Factor is a much longer series than The Voice, running for around double the number of hours per year. So Gary Barlow's rumoured £1.5m salary for TXF works out at approximately £750k for the (roughly) 20 hours that The Voice will air. IIRC, last year Tulisa got £250k, Louis got £1m and Kelly got £500k so they spent around £3.25m on judges for a ~42 hour series, so around £80k per hour. On The Voice meanwhile the judges are apparently getting £1.15m in total over ~20 hours, so around £57k per hour is being spent on judges, so there isn't really much difference in the hourly spend there. I'd expect those costs to rise on TVUK next year too (although it'll probably run for more hours).

If they're paying £22m for 2 years then they'll be paying £11m for this series, which over 20 hours works out at £550k per hour. Not sure whether that includes talent, production etc but either way it's pretty expensive for an entertainment show (less than the Cowell shows but more than Strictly and similar to DOI). It's still cheaper than drama though and with 9 million viewers it's definitely been a hugely worthwhile investment for BBC1.

ITV are paying £40m per year for the Cowell shows, so as TXF runs for around double the number of hours per year as BGT it looks like they're paying just over £13m per year for BGT, which over ~20 hours works out at around £650k per hour. Again I don't know what this includes, but the difference between the two shows budgets isn't actually that huge, and both cost their broadcasters a fair bit.”

Good point - and I think too the actual time spent filming would end up being even less than half for The Voice. I think they only had a few audition days, while TXF and BGT usually have 2-3 days in around 6 cities. Boot Camp and Judges Houses add 4-5 days to the schedule, then there are 10 weeks of live shows compared to 6 for The Voice.
danisfunny
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“It failed to make the multichannel top 30 for the week so it was under 660,000 viewers.”

Thanks, anyone have access to the overnights??
ronant
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“It failed to make the multichannel top 30 for the week so it was under 660,000 viewers.”

Doesn't the multichannel top 30 come out tomorrow for that week?
dave01
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Saturday 31st March Overnights
BBC One
18:00- Winter Wipeout: 2.93m (17.2%)
19:00- The Voice UK: 9.00m (39.3%)
* peak: 10.2m
* 20:00-20:20: 9.63m

20:20- The National Lottery: In It To Win It: 4.09m (16.8%)
21:10- Casualty: 4.92m (21.9%)”

Very good signs for The Voice to be increasing week-on-week for the 2nd episode. The share is up 1.7% too, which is encouraging. I thought it would remain about level or see a small drop but the weather has changed and the show has done well on word-of-mouth over the past week. Casualty's rating was disapointing considering no BGT clash and a cold dark March night.

Quote:
“ITV1
18:00- You've Been Framed: 2.85m (17.5%)
18:30- Best of Harry Hill's TV Burp: 3.33m (18.8%)
19:00- All Star Family Fortunes: 3.53m (16.2%)
20:00- Britain's Got Talent: 10.28m (41.3%) , +1: 548k (2.4%)
* peak (exc +1): 12.0m (48%)
* peak (inc +1): 12.6m (50%)
* 20:00-20:20: 7.6m

21:05- Take Me Out: 4.39m (19.8%) , +1: 215k (1.8%)”

Good signs for BGT, the ratings are up and the show does seem much better to watch this year. Take Me Out hasn't really taken much of a boost though, if anything it seems to be down a bit since BGT started - could well be the pull of BGT on +1 and ITV2 effect.

Quote:
“Channel 4
18:50- Avatar: 1.04m (4.6%)
22:00- Million Pound Drop Live: 1.2m (6.9%)”

Avatar has really not turned out to be big a rater. It had 3.1m [inc +1] last week, which is decent in terms of normal C4 film premieres but I do think they'd have been hoping for 4m at least for this one. I recall someone mentioned that C4 had spent a lot for 2 terrestrial showings of this film, so I think they will be quite disapointed with the ratings it has pulled in the last 2 weeks. Probably it is the sort of film that was sold as must watch in 3D and the fans buy on DVD so perhaps not a big bucks TV film.

Would be interested in how Avatar's TV premiere in the US or Australia if anyone knows?

Originally Posted by jake lyle:
“I think The Voice is giving it a boost but the biggest boost to BGT is the fact that its airing 4/5 weeks earlier than previous years. There is a big difference in a May Saturday night and a late March one especially in the 8pm slot.
Last nights episode was down 0.2 of a sharepoint on last years 2nd episode but was up 1.3m in raw viewers!”

Very interesting point about the time of year effect, BGT share is down slightly year-on-year although the raw figures are up.
iaindb
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by ronant:
“Doesn't the multichannel top 30 come out tomorrow for that week?”

Sorry, should have said - I was quoting the top 30 for the overnights.
Andy23
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by jake lyle:
“I think The Voice is giving it a boost but the biggest boost to BGT is the fact that its airing 4/5 weeks earlier than previous years. ”

3 weeks earlier actually, it launched on the 15th April last year.
Fudd
01-04-2012
Ok, so I'm full of rubbish. I didn't expect The Voice to increase by that extent or Britain's Got Talent to increase at all. Instead they both recorded stunning figures. The rest of the ratings look low in comparison though - The Lottery, Casualty and Take Me Out performed respectably. Avatar collected 4m viewers in total which isn't dire but it could've done better.
danisfunny
01-04-2012
How do we think Once Upon a Time has rated?? I really liked it, and think it fits in with C5's target audience...
AlexiR
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“Good point - and I think too the actual time spent filming would end up being even less than half for The Voice. I think they only had a few audition days, while TXF and BGT usually have 2-3 days in around 6 cities. Boot Camp and Judges Houses add 4-5 days to the schedule, then there are 10 weeks of live shows compared to 6 for The Voice.”

The vast difference in time requirement is really the key when discussing not only salaries but the calibre of the talent involved. The truth is that The X Factor is always going to struggle to secure big name artists because of the massive time commitment required to do it. Most artists can't afford to give up that much of their time or have no desire to. Indeed they struggled to accommodate Gary Barlow's schedule. In part the time commitment is why Cowell has struggled to get names attached to the US version as well. In contrast the pre-live stage of The Voice can be done in 3-4 days of shooting.
Dancc
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Avatar collected 4m viewers in total which isn't dire but it could've done better.”

Considering Elf got that last Christmas for its fifth annual outing(s), it's not great for the premiere of a particularly high-profile title like Avatar. I think C4 will be disappointed with how it rated. Especially last night where it couldn't better the benchmark set by Gypsy Wedding repeats in previous weeks.
Cent
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Considering Elf got that last Christmas for its fifth annual outing(s), it's not great for the premiere of a particularly high-profile title like Avatar. I think C4 will be disappointed with how it rated. Especially last night where it couldn't better the benchmark set by Gypsy Wedding repeats in previous weeks.”

I don't think Channel 4 would have had high expectations for Avatar.

It made so much money because people wanted to see it in 3D. I don't think there was much appeal in seeing in 2D.
Fudd
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Considering Elf got that last Christmas for its fifth annual outing(s), it's not great for the premiere of a particularly high-profile title like Avatar. I think C4 will be disappointed with how it rated. Especially last night where it couldn't better the benchmark set by Gypsy Wedding repeats in previous weeks.”

Though it was in a 'lighter' time slot against an improving Britain's Got Talent and The Voice.
SamuelW
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by danisfunny:
“How do we think Once Upon a Time has rated?? I really liked it, and think it fits in with C5's target audience...”

2million viewers. I would say 2.3million but Harry Potter is a popular movie and will appeal to same kind of viewers.
Dancc
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by danisfunny:
“How do we think Once Upon a Time has rated?? I really liked it, and think it fits in with C5's target audience...”

No clue. It's making my head hurt just thinking about the possibilities, there's such a big potential range. C5 have done all they can with the marketing, and the presentation complete with special ident, break bumpers and break flashes was excellent, so hopefully they are rewarded with the audience this great show deserves. The response has been very positive which is always a good sign.

I should get the overnights quite early tomorrow so I will reveal all as soon as I find out!
Joe40
01-04-2012
If you missed Titanic, let comedian Chris Addison give you a summary...

http://twitter.com/#!/mrchrisaddison

This can't rate well, attacked in all directions at 9pm (Silent Witness, Homeland, a decent BBC4 documentary on rally drivers, and films for the youngsters like Streetdance).
Channel 4 + 1 had Disasters At Sea. Appropriately.
iaindb
01-04-2012
I see the logic in ITV1 repeated Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince tonight. It's the start of the Easter holidays for the kids.
danisfunny
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“2million viewers. I would say 2.3million but Harry Potter is a popular movie and will appeal to same kind of viewers.”

Originally Posted by Dancc:
“No clue. It's making my head hurt just thinking about the possibilities, there's such a big potential range. C5 have done all they can with the marketing, and the presentation complete with special ident, break bumpers and break flashes was excellent, so hopefully they are rewarded with the audience this great show deserves. The response has been very positive which is always a good sign.

I should get the overnights quite early tomorrow so I will reveal all as soon as I find out! ”

Good points, I was thinking the mid 2's due to the massive marketing campaign, really can't wait for next week, very clever concept and hopefully one of many big new (less csi like) imports for 5 (after the success of walking dead last year)..
wildbenji64
01-04-2012
Was it just me or did Once Upon a Time finish 6 minutes early? I was watching on a few minutes delay and it still fell well short of 9pm. First time I've watched Five in months, maybe even a year.
Charnham
01-04-2012
all this Titanic stuff reminds me of Doctor Who: Voyage of the Dammed

other than that, I dont care anymore.
AlexiR
01-04-2012
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“all this Titanic stuff reminds me of Doctor Who: Voyage of the Dammed

other than that, I dont care anymore.”

At least Voyage of the Dammed had the decency to be only one episode of poorly acted and written nonsensical cliche ridden rubbish. And air said episode on a day I could watch it drunk without issue so didn't mind the aforementioned problems quite so much.
<<
<
77 of 125
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map